INTRODUCTION
Blastocystis spp. is one of the most common intestinal protozoa reported in humans globally, with a high prevalence in developing countries.1 In Thailand, epidemiologic studies of Blastocystis infection showed incidences as high as 10–40% in different populations.2–4 Several forms of Blastocystis are observed in fecal specimens (i.e., amoeboid, vacuolar, avacuolar, granular, multivacuolar, and cyst). Of these, the vacuolar form is mostly recognized under microscopic examination. Transmission of Blastocystis occurs by the fecal–oral route. It has been postulated that thin-walled cysts are responsible for auto-infectivity in the host, whereas thick-walled cysts effect external transmission.5 Transmission can be facilitated by the contamination of the environment, food, or water with excreted cysts from the reservoir hosts. Blastocystis cysts, which are 3–6 μm in diameter, remain viable under suitable conditions. Water-borne transmission of blastocystosis is indicated in a few studies.3,6–8 Our previous epidemiologic study in army personnel showed a significant association of blastocystosis and drinking unboiled water.3 It was postulated that infective cysts could possibly be obtained from contaminated drinking water.
To date, genotypic characterization using molecular techniques has been used to study the epidemiology of various infections including blastocystosis. These techniques are useful to identify routes of transmission and sources of infections. In this study, a cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate intestinal parasitic infections in schoolchildren of a primary school, Chacherngsao province, central Thailand, during January 2005. Genetic characterization of Blastocystis collected from schoolchildren using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of the SSU ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene was performed. Attempts to show the subtype of Blastocystis contaminated in the water supply provided at the school using PCR-RFLP and sequencing analysis of the SSU rRNA gene were also done to support evidence of water-borne transmission because a high prevalence of blastocystis was noticed. In addition, risk factors associated with blastocystosis in schoolchildren were also analyzed in this study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study population.
A cross-sectional study of intestinal parasitic infections was performed in a primary school that consisted of ~700 children between 6 and 13 years of age, Chacherngsao province, central Thailand, in January 2005. This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Royal Thai Army, Medical Department. Informed consents were obtained from parents or guardians before enrollment. A stool specimen from each enrolled student was examined for intestinal parasitic infections under light microscopy by wet preparation and formalin ethyl acetate concentration. Because wet preparation and formalin ethyl acetate concentration was less sensitive for the detection of Blastocystis, cultivation of Blastocystis using Jones medium supplemented with 10% horse serum was preformed as previously described.9–11
Questionnaires.
To determine the risk factors and outcomes of parasitic infections, standardized questionnaires concerning demographic data, sanitary behaviors, source and treatment method of drinking water, animal contacts, and a history of gastrointestinal symptoms were included.
DNA extraction of Blastocystis in stool specimens.
Positive samples of Blastocystis from culture medium were used for subtype identification. Extraction of genomic DNA of Blastocystis was performed using FTA filter paper as previously described.12
Water collection and extraction of DNA.
To determine the possible source of Blastocystis, samples of the water supply within the school were collected and examined for Blastocystis using PCR. Approximately 3,000 mL of water was collected from five sources in the school area (i.e., water samples from three water reservoirs and two tanks of collected rain-water). DNA extraction was performed using a commercial kit, UltraClean Water DNA Isolation Kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA). Water samples were enumerated by vacuum filtering through 0.22-μm pore size, and DNA of any organisms present in water was extracted from the trapped filter, following the manufacturer’s instructions. Extracted DNA was kept at −20°C until used for PCR amplification of the SSU rRNA gene of Blastocystis. In addition, PCR for detecting Giardia duodenalis using primers amplifying the glutamate dehydrogenase (gdh) gene was also performed.13
RFLP analysis of the Blastocystis SSU rRNA gene.
Genotypic characterization of Blastocystis was determined using PCR-RFLP analysis of 1,100 bp of the partial SSU rRNA gene. Extracted DNA was amplified by a pair of primers described by Clark.14 Secondary PCR was performed using a specific pair of primers described by Bohm-Glöning and others.15 The secondary PCR product produced the expected size of 1,100 bp. Digestion of PCR products was performed using three restriction enzymes, HinfI, RsaI, and AluI endonucleases (Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, MD), separated by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized under UV light and documented on high-density printing paper using a Uvisave gel documentation system I (Uvitech, Cambridge, UK).
Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of the SSU rRNA gene of Blastocystis.
To confirm the subtypes, nucleotide sequencing of the SSU rRNA gene of Blastocystis from schoolchildren and the water samples was conducted by Bioservice Unit, Bangkok, Thailand. Chromatograms were manually checked and edited using Sequencher version 4.0.5 (Gene Codes Inc., Ann Arbor, MI). Subsequently, nucleotide sequences of the SSU rRNA gene of Blastocystis obtained in this study were multiple aligned with a set of 33 other Blastocystis isolates retrieved from the GenBank database using BioEdit version 7.0.1. Phylogenetic analysis of SSU rRNA was carried out using MrBAYES version 3.1.2.16 Bayesian analyses of the SSU rRNA dataset were performed using the GTR (general time reversible) + Γ (gamma distribution of rates with four rate categories) + Ι (proportion of invariant sites) model of sequence evolution, with base frequencies, the proportion of invariant sites, and the shape parameter α of the Γ distribution estimated from the data. In Bayesian analyses, starting trees were random, four simultaneous Markov chains were run for 500,000 generations, burn-in values were set at 30,000 generations, and trees were sampled every 100 generations. Bayesian posterior probabilities were calculated using a Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling approach implemented in MrBAYES version 3.1.2.17 The analysis was carried out with the inclusion of the 16S-like rRNA gene from Proteromonas lacerate (U37108), an organism phylogenetically closely related to Blastocystis as the outgroup.18
Statistical analysis.
The association between potential risk factors and Blastocystis infection was assessed by the χ2 test with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Univariate analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows version 11.5 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs and P values were calculated to compare outcome among study groups. Logistic regression was performed for multivariate analysis to assess the independent association of risk factors and blastocystosis.
RESULTS
Prevalence of parasitic infections.
Of 675 stool samples, 227 (33.6%) schoolchildren were positive for intestinal parasitic infections as shown in Table 1. Approximately 31% had a single parasitic infection, whereas 2.5% had mixed infections. Intestinal protozoa (i.e., Blastocystis [18.9%], G. duodenalis [5.6%], Trichomonas hominis [3.0%], and Entamoeba coli [2.5%]) were predominantly found in this population. Those who were infected with pathogenic parasites were treated with appropriate antiprotozoal or anthelminthic drugs.
Characterization of schoolchildren with Blastocystis infection.
The characteristics of schoolchildren and the prevalence of Blastocystis infection are shown in Table 2. There was no significant difference among sex, age group, family income, parent’s education, number of children per household, history of animal contacts (dogs or cats), type of drinking water at home (treated or untreated water), and gastrointestinal symptoms. However, the prevalence of Blastocystis infection in the children who were positive for G. duodenalis, E. coli, or T. hominis was 4.2 times greater than those who were not.
Genotypic characterization of Blastocystis in stools and water samples.
Using a nested PCR amplification of the SSU rRNA gene of Blastocystis, ~ 54% (68/126) of samples were positive for PCR with the expected amplicon at 1,100 bp. Of 68 positive PCR samples, subtype characterization of Blastocystis was performed. The most common banding RFLP patterns of Blastocystis from schoolchildren were identical to subtype 1, with a prevalence of 77.9%. The remaining samples (22.1%) were positive for subtype 2. Figure 1 shows the representative Blastocystis RFLP banding patterns of subtype 1 and subtype 2 produced by HinfI, RsaI, and AluI endonucleases, respectively. There was no mixed subtype infection detected in these PCR-positive samples. Blastocystis DNA was amplified from one water sample collected from a storage tank in the canteen (Figure 2). The other four water samples were negative for Blastocystis and G. duodenalis by specific PCR amplification.
Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of the SSU rRNA gene of Blastocystis.
From the schoolchildren’s specimens, three and one samples of Blastocystis subtype 1 and subtype 2, respectively, were processed for nucleotide sequencing of the SSU rRNA genes. Nucleotide sequences of the SSU rRNA genes of Blastocystis subtype 2 were submitted to Gen-Bank under accession numbers EF200010. The 1,700-bp sequences of Blastocystis subtype 1 from schoolchildren and water samples and 1,022-bp sequences of Blastocystis subtype 2 were multiple aligned with a set of 33 other Blastocystis isolates retrieved from the GenBank database. An inferred phylogenetic tree of SSU rRNA sequences of Blastocystis from the water samples and schoolchildren with 33 sequences of Blastocystis in the GenBank database and the outgroup, Proteromonas lacertae, was constructed to examine the genetic relationships. The rooted maximum-likelihood tree of Blastocystis sequence alignment identified nine clades of subtypes 1–9 with strong support by Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPs) of 100% for each clade (Figure 3). Blastocystis identified from the schoolchildren and the water sample were clustered with subtype 1 and showed 100% identity with our previously report Blastocystis (accession number AF439782). In addition, another subtype of Blastocystis isolate (accession number EF200010) identified from the schoolchildren formed a monophyletic group sharing within the clade of Blastocystis subtype 2 with a BP value of 100%.
Risk factors of Blastocystis infection.
Using univariate and multivariate analysis, sex, age, family income, parents’ education, number of children per household, history of animal contacts, and type and treatment method of drinking water at home were not significant risks of Blastocystis infection in these children. Those who had other intestinal protozoal infections, including G. duodenalis, E. coli, and T. hominis, had 11.3 times greater risk of getting Blastocystis infection (95% CI, 5.0–25.5; P < 0.001). When only Blastocystis subtype 1 was analyzed, this risk still remained, with an OR of 5.0 (95% CI, 2.1–12.0; P = 0.001). However, there was no significant association between this risk and Blastocystis subtype 2 (OR = 1.8; 95% CI, 0.2–14.6; P = 0.448).
DISCUSSION
Studies of Blastocystis infection in Thai children showed that the prevalence ranged from 0.8% to 45.2% depending on the study population and the detection methods.19–22 The studies that used in vitro cultivation for the detection of Blastocystis infection showed rather high prevalences.20,22 In this study, the highest prevalence of Blastocystis was found among intestinal parasitic infections. To understand the transmission of Blastocystis in this population, subtyping of Blastocystis from schoolchildren and water sources was performed. PCR-RFLP of the SSU rRNA gene has been widely used to characterize Blastocystis, which could differentiate the organism into clades, groups or subtypes, subgroups, ribodemes, and clusters depending on the authors’ criteria. However, because the Blastocystis SSU rRNA gene exhibits a high degree of genetic diversity, PCR-RFLP results may be very confusing or difficult to interpret. Thus, a consensus of Blastocystis subtypes has been recently provided based on the analysis of published SSU rRNA gene sequences.23
Distribution of Blastocystis subtypes is geographically different; most studies showed that subtype 3 was most frequently observed in humans (61%).24 Our previous study showed that subtype 1 was the most predominant in Thailand, followed by subtypes 3 and 7.25 A study in a different area of Thailand identified subtypes 5 and 6.26 In this study, the most common subtype identified in the schoolchildren was subtype 1, followed by subtype 2. The absence of Blastocystis subtype 3 in this population might be simply explained by a different geographic distribution. Interestingly, Blastocystis subtype 3 is probably the only subtype of human origin. Recent studies conducted in urbanized cities such as Japan, Denmark, and Singapore where zoonotic transmission might be limited found that Blastocystis subtype 3 was predominant.27–30 In contrast to a study from Jiangxi, China, subtype 1, previously identified in various kinds of animals, was predominantly found in humans.31 This study was conducted in the rural community of central Thailand where zoonotic transmission of intestinal protozoal infection might occur.32 On the other hand, the absence of Blastocystis subtype 3 could be caused by the limited sensitivity of the detection method for Blastocystis subtype 3.28 Because nearly one half of the samples gave a negative PCR result, we cannot rule out the existence of other subtypes. It has been suggested that the use of multiple primer pairs is very useful to make sure that all subtypes have been identified.28
Pathogenicity of Blastocystis is still not clear because of conflicting reports on clinical symptoms caused by Blastocystis infection. Most studies showed that most cases of blastocystosis were asymptomatic; however, symptomatic cases with non-specific gastrointestinal symptoms, including irritable bowel syndrome, were also reported.33,34 It has been shown that the amoeboid form may be responsible for gastrointestinal symptoms because it presented predominantly in symptomatic patients.35 Phylogenetic analysis of the SSU rRNA gene using arbitrarily primed PCR (AP-PCR) also showed distinct clades of Blastocystis between those of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.36 Thus, distinct subtypes of Blastocystis may have different role in its pathogenicity. In this study, no specific gastrointestinal symptoms were found in these Blastocystis-infected children.
Blastocystis has been detected in humans and wide varieties of animal hosts.18,25,26,37 The evidence suggesting the possibility of blastocystosis as a zoonosis was from genotypic characterization of the organism in humans compared with those found in animals.25,26 Interestingly, some subtypes can be identified in both humans and animals, which indicates a zoonotic potential of these subtypes. For example, subtype 1 could be identified both in humans and a very wide range of animals (i.e., pigs, horses, monkeys, cattle, rodents, chickens, quails, and pheasants).25,37,38 In natural settings, subtype 5 was also identified both in humans and dogs from the same village in Thailand.26 A recent study using animal models showed that several human subtypes of Blastocystis could infect chickens and/or rats, confirming the zoonotic potential of human Blastocystis isolates.39 However, only a small number of epidemiologic studies have implicated zoonotic transmission of Blastocystis. Rajah and others40 found that those who worked closely with animals had a higher prevalence of blastocystosis compared with those who did not. Additional evidence from epidemiologic studies is needed to support the role of zoonotic transmission.
In contrast, waterborne transmission of blastocystosis has been suggested by a number of epidemiologic studies. Our studies indicated that those who consumed untreated water had higher risk of getting Blastocystis infection.3,6 Recently, it was identified that infections caused by subtype 3 were associated with drinking unboiled water.7 Water-borne transmission of blastocystosis is not unexpected because Blastocystis cysts can survive in different types of water. A study by Suresh and others8 showed that viable Blastocystis cysts were detected in sewage samples. In addition, it has been shown that cysts of Blastocystis could survive in chlorinated water at standard concentrations.41 Drinking water used by schoolchildren in this school was mainly from rainwater that was stored in two tanks. No further treatment of drinking water by filtration or boiling was done. Blastocystis was identified by PCR but not conventional microscopy or in vitro cultivation. We detected Blastocystis subtype 1 in a water sample from one of these storage tanks. The nucleotide sequence of the SSU rRNA gene showed 100% identity to those of subtype 1 found in stool specimens of schoolchildren. Thus, it can be postulated that contaminated rainwater might be the source of Blastocystis infection in this school. Contamination of the rainwater could occur along the roof, pipe, or in the storage tank. Although we did not examine the possible sources of contaminants, it was likely that contaminations could be from droppings of some animals. As mentioned above, a wide range of animals could be a reservoir of Blastocystis, especially subtype 1. Unfortunately, we did not have the epidemiologic data to support the association of drinking water at school and blastocystosis because we only included the information of water at home and not at school in our questionnaire. In contrast, our epidemiologic data showed no significant association between the prevalence of Blastocystis infection with types of drinking water at home. As a result, Blastocystis infection was less likely to occur at home. Thus far, techniques to detect Blastocystis in water samples have not been standardized. The method used in this study was easy to perform and allowed using less amount of water samples (3,000 mL). Thus, this technique could be potentially applicable to detect Blastocystis. Further study for improving and validating the protocols for the detection and genotypic characterization of Blastocystis in water should be performed.
In this study, co-infections of G. duodenalis and T. hominis were significantly associated with Blastocystis infection, particularly subtype 1. It has been well recognized that water is the main route of transmission of G. duodenalis.42 Although DNA of G. duodenalis could not be detected by PCR amplification in these water samples, this epidemiologic data possibly support evidence of water-borne transmission of these intestinal protozoa. This emphasizes the importance of providing safe drinking water for preventing these protozoa infections.
In conclusion, we describe the possibility of waterborne transmission of Blastocystis using molecular techniques. Subtype 1, which was shown in stool specimens of schoolchildren and drinking water in this school, supports the evidence of waterborne transmission of Blastocystis. This study draws attention to public health policy for development control program to reduce the morbidity of intestinal protozoa infections, especially waterborne zoonotic disease such as blastocystosis in schoolchildren.
Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections in primary schoolchildren
Organism | Number infected | Percent infected |
---|---|---|
Blastocystis spp. | 126 | 18.7 |
Giardia duodenalis | 38 | 5.6 |
Opisthorchis viverrini | 20 | 3.0 |
Entamoeba coli | 18 | 2.7 |
Trichomonas hominis | 17 | 2.5 |
Trichuris trichiura | 7 | 1.0 |
Small intestinal fluke | 7 | 1.0 |
Hookworm | 5 | 0.7 |
Enterobius vermicuralis | 3 | 0.4 |
Strongyloides stercolaris | 2 | 0.3 |
Total | 243 | 33.6 |
Characteristics of the enrolled primary schoolchildren and prevalence of blastocystosis
Characteristics | Number (%) | Prevalence of blastocystosis (%) | P value |
---|---|---|---|
Sex | |||
Male | 336 (51.2) | 65 (19.3) | |
Female | 320 (48.8) | 57 (17.8) | 0.614 |
Age group (years) | |||
< 9 | 235 (35.9) | 42 (17.9) | |
≥ 9 | 420 (64.1) | 80 (19.1) | 0.711 |
Parent’s primary education | |||
Complete | 82 (12.5) | 19 (23.2) | |
Incomplete | 574 (87.5) | 103 (17.9) | 0.255 |
Number of children/household | |||
≤ 3 | 118 (18) | 24 (20.3) | |
> 3 | 538 (82) | 98 (18.2) | 0.591 |
Frequency of dog contact, three times or more/wk | |||
Yes | 269 (41) | 55 (20.4) | |
No | 387 (59) | 67 (17.3) | 0.310 |
Frequency of cat contact, three or more times/wk | |||
Yes | 189 (28.8) | 42 (22.2) | |
No | 467 (71.2) | 80 (17.1) | 0.129 |
Drinking water (at home) | |||
Untreated water | 527 (80.3) | 99 (18.8) | |
Treated water (boiled or filtered) | 129 (19.7) | 23 (17.8) | 0.802 |
Co-infection with other protozoan parasites | |||
Yes | 29 (4.4) | 20 (68.9) | |
No | 627 (95.6) | 102 (16.3) | < 0.001 |
Total | 656 (100) | 122 (18.6) |

PCR-RFLP patterns of Blastocystis SSU rRNA gene from stool specimens of children. A, Subtype 1. B, Subtype 2. M, molecular marker (100-bp ladder). Lanes 1–3 show restriction enzyme profiles of 1,100 bp of the SSU rRNA gene digested by HinfI, RsaI, and AluI, respectively.
Citation: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Am J Trop Med Hyg 79, 3; 10.4269/ajtmh.2008.79.401

PCR-RFLP patterns of Blastocystis SSU rRNA gene from stool specimens of children. A, Subtype 1. B, Subtype 2. M, molecular marker (100-bp ladder). Lanes 1–3 show restriction enzyme profiles of 1,100 bp of the SSU rRNA gene digested by HinfI, RsaI, and AluI, respectively.
Citation: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Am J Trop Med Hyg 79, 3; 10.4269/ajtmh.2008.79.401
PCR-RFLP patterns of Blastocystis SSU rRNA gene from stool specimens of children. A, Subtype 1. B, Subtype 2. M, molecular marker (100-bp ladder). Lanes 1–3 show restriction enzyme profiles of 1,100 bp of the SSU rRNA gene digested by HinfI, RsaI, and AluI, respectively.
Citation: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Am J Trop Med Hyg 79, 3; 10.4269/ajtmh.2008.79.401

PCR product at 1,100 bp of the SSU rRNA gene of Blastocystis (Lane 6) detected in one water sample in a storage tank. M, molecular marker (100-bp ladder). Lanes 1–5 show negative amplification of other water samples.
Citation: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Am J Trop Med Hyg 79, 3; 10.4269/ajtmh.2008.79.401

PCR product at 1,100 bp of the SSU rRNA gene of Blastocystis (Lane 6) detected in one water sample in a storage tank. M, molecular marker (100-bp ladder). Lanes 1–5 show negative amplification of other water samples.
Citation: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Am J Trop Med Hyg 79, 3; 10.4269/ajtmh.2008.79.401
PCR product at 1,100 bp of the SSU rRNA gene of Blastocystis (Lane 6) detected in one water sample in a storage tank. M, molecular marker (100-bp ladder). Lanes 1–5 show negative amplification of other water samples.
Citation: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Am J Trop Med Hyg 79, 3; 10.4269/ajtmh.2008.79.401

Maximum-likelihood phylogeny of Blastocystis isolates inferred from SSU rRNA gene sequences. The 1,700-bp sequences of Blastocystis subtype 1 from schoolchildren and water sample and 1,022-bp sequences of Blastocystis subtype 2 were used for the phylogenetic analysis.
Citation: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Am J Trop Med Hyg 79, 3; 10.4269/ajtmh.2008.79.401

Maximum-likelihood phylogeny of Blastocystis isolates inferred from SSU rRNA gene sequences. The 1,700-bp sequences of Blastocystis subtype 1 from schoolchildren and water sample and 1,022-bp sequences of Blastocystis subtype 2 were used for the phylogenetic analysis.
Citation: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Am J Trop Med Hyg 79, 3; 10.4269/ajtmh.2008.79.401
Maximum-likelihood phylogeny of Blastocystis isolates inferred from SSU rRNA gene sequences. The 1,700-bp sequences of Blastocystis subtype 1 from schoolchildren and water sample and 1,022-bp sequences of Blastocystis subtype 2 were used for the phylogenetic analysis.
Citation: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Am J Trop Med Hyg 79, 3; 10.4269/ajtmh.2008.79.401
Address correspondence to Saovanee Leelayoova, Department of Parasitology, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, 315 Ratchawithi Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400, Thailand. E-mail: s_leelayoova@scientist.com
Authors’ addresses: Saovanee Leelayoova, Suradej Siripattanapipong, Tawee Naaglor, Paanjit Taamasri, Phunlerd Piyaraj, and Mathirut Mungthin, Department of Parasitology, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, 315 Ratchawithi Rd., Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400, Thailand. Umaporn Thathaisong, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Burapha University, Chonburi Province 20131, Thailand.
Financial support: This study was financially supported by the Office of Research Development, Ministry of Defense, Thailand, and the Thailand Research Fund (BRG 4880003).
REFERENCES
- 2↑
Mungthin M, Suwannasaeng R, Naaglor T, Areekul W, Leelayoova S, 2001. Asymptomatic intestinal microsporidiosis in Thai orphans and child-care workers. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 95 :304–306.
- 3↑
Taamasri P, Mungthin M, Rangsin R, Tongupprakarn B, Areekul W, Leelayoova S, 2000. Transmission of intestinal blastocystosis related to the quality of drinking water. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 31 :112–117.
- 4↑
Taamasri P, Leelayoova S, Rangsin R, Naaglor T, Ketupanya A, Mungthin M, 2002. Prevalence of Blastocystis hominis carriage in Thai army personnel based in Chonburi, Thailand. Mil Med 167 :643–646.
- 5↑
Singh M, Suresh K, Ho LC, Ng GC, Yap EH, 1995. Elucidation of the life cycle of the intestinal protozoan Blastocystis hominis. Parasitol Res 81 :446–450.
- 6↑
Leelayoova S, Rangsin S, Taamasri P, Naaglor T, Thathaisong U, Mungthin M, 2004. Evidence of waterborne transmission of Blastocystis hominis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 70 :658–662.
- 7↑
Li LH, Zhou XN, Du ZW, Wang XZ, Wang LB, Jiang JY, Yoshikawa H, Steinmann P, Utzinger J, Wu Z, Chen JX, Chen SH, Zhang L, 2007. Molecular epidemiology of human Blastocystis in a village in Yunnan province, China. Parasitol Int 56 :107–112.
- 8↑
Suresh K, Smith HV, Tan TC, 2005. Viable Blastocystis cysts in Scottish and Malaysian sewage samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 71 :5619–5620.
- 9↑
Jones WR, 1946. The experimental infection of rats with Entamoeba histolytica. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 40 :130–140.
- 10
Leelayoova S, Taamasri P, Rangsin R, Naaglor T, Thathaisong U, Mungthin M, 2002. In-vitro cultivation: a sensitive method for detecting Blastocystis hominis. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 96 :803–807.
- 11↑
Termmathurapoj S, Leelayoova S, Aimpun P, Thathaisong U, Nimmanon T, Taamasri P, Mungthin M, 2004. The usefulness of short-term in vitro cultivation for the detection and molecular study of Blastocystis hominis in stool specimens. Parasitol Res 93 :445–447.
- 12↑
Subrungruang I, Mungthin M, Chavalitshewinkoon-Petmitr P, Rangsin R, Naaglor T, Leelayoova S, 2004. Evaluation of DNA extraction and PCR methods for detection of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in stool specimens. J Clin Microbiol 42 :3490–3494.
- 13↑
Reed CM, Monis PT, Thompson RC, 2004. Discrimination of all genotypes of Giardia duodenalis at the glutamate dehydrogenase locus using PCR-RFLP. Infect Genet Evol 4 :125–130.
- 14↑
Clark CG, 1997. Extensive genetic diversity in Blastocystis hominis. Mol Biochem Parasitol 87 :79–83.
- 15↑
Bohm-Glöning B, Knobloch J, Walderich B, 1997. Five subgroups of Blastocystis hominis isolated from symptomatic and asymptomatic patients revealed by restriction site analysis of PCR-amplified 16S-like rDNA. Trop Med Int Health 2 :771–778.
- 16↑
Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F, 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17 :754–755.
- 17↑
Green PJ, 1995. Reversible jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination. Biometrika 82 :711–732.
- 18↑
Noël C, Peyronnet C, Gerbod D, Edgcomb VP, Delgado-Viscogliosi P, Sogin ML, Capron M, Viscogliosi E, Zenner L, 2003. Phylogenetic analysis of Blastocystis isolates from different hosts based on the comparison of small-subunit rRNA gene sequences. Mol Biochem Parasitol 126 :119–123.
- 19↑
Waikagul J, Krudsood S, Radomyos P, Radomyos B, Chalemrut K, Jonsuksuntigul P, Kojima S, Looareesuwan S, Thaineau W, 2002. A cross-sectional study of intestinal parasitic infections among schoolchildren in Nan Province, Northern Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 33 :218–223.
- 20↑
Saksirisampant W, Nuchprayoon S, Wiwanitkit V, Yenthakam S, Ampavasiri A, 2003. Intestinal parasitic infestations among children in an orphanage in Pathum Thani province. J Med Assoc Thai 86 (Suppl 2):S263–S270.
- 21
Rapeeporn Y, Warunee N, Nuttapong W, Sompong S, Rachada K, 2006. Infection of Blastocystis hominis in primary schoolchildren from Nakhon Pathom province, Thailand. Trop Biomed 23 :117–122.
- 22↑
Warunee N, Choomanee L, Sataporn P, Rapeeporn Y, Nuttapong W, Sompong S, Thongdee S, Bang-On S, Rachada K, 2007. Intestinal parasitic infections among school children in Thailand. Trop Biomed 24 :83–88.
- 23↑
Stensvold CR, Suresh GK, Tan KSW, Thompson RCA, Traub RJ, Viscogliosi E, Yoshikawa H, Clark CG, 2007. Terminology for Blastocystis subtypes-a consensus. Trends Parasitol 23 :93–96.
- 24↑
Özyurt M, Kurt O, Mølbak K, Nielsen HV, Haznedaroglu T, Stensvold CR, 2008. Molecular epidemiology of Blastocystis infections in Turkey. Parasitol Int 57 :300–306.
- 25↑
Thathaisong U, Worapong J, Mungthin M, Tan-Ariya P, Viputtigul K, Sudatis A, Noonai A, Leelayoova S, 2003. Blastocystis isolates from a pig and a horse are closely related to Blastocystis hominis. J Clin Microbiol 41 :967–975.
- 26↑
Parkar U, Traub RJ, Kumar S, Mungthin M, Vitali S, Leelayoova S, Morris K, Thompson RC, 2007. Direct characterization of Blastocystis from faeces by PCR and evidence of zoonotic potential. Parasitology 134 :359–367.
- 27↑
Kaneda Y, Horiki N, Cheng XJ, Fujita Y, Maruyama M, Tachibana H, 2001. Ribodemes of Blastocystis hominis isolated in Japan. Am J Trop Med Hyg 65 :393–396.
- 28↑
Stensvold R, Brillowska-Dabrowska A, Nielsen HV, Arendrup MC, 2006. Detection of Blastocystis hominis in unpreserved stool specimens by using polymerase chain reaction. J Parasitol 92 :1081–1087.
- 29
Stensvold CR, Arendrup MC, Jespersgaard C, Mølbak K, Nielsen HV, 2007. Detecting Blastocystis using parasitologic and DNA-based methods: a comparative study. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 59 :303–307.
- 30↑
Wong KH, Ng GC, Lin RT, Yoshikawa H, Taylor MB, Tan KS, 2008. Predominance of subtype 3 among Blastocystis isolates from a major hospital in Singapore. Parasitol Res 102 :663–670.
- 31↑
Yan Y, Su S, Lai R, Liao H, Ye J, Li X, Luo X, Chen G, 2006. Genetic variability of Blastocystis hominis isolates in China. Parasitol Res 99 :597–601.
- 32↑
Ratanapo S, Mungthin M, Soontrapa S, Faithed C, Siripattanapipong S, Rangsin R, Naaglor T, Piyaraj P, Taamasri P, Leelayoova S, 2008. Multiple modes of transmission of giardiasis in primary schoolchildren of a rural community, Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg 78 :611–615.
- 33↑
Hussain R, Jaferi W, Zuberi S, Baqai R, Abrar N, Ahmed A, Zaman V, 1997. Significantly increased IgG2 subclass antibody levels to Blastocystis hominis in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Trop Med Hyg 56 :301–306.
- 34↑
Yakoob J, Jafri W, Jafri N, Khan R, Islam M, Beg MA, Zaman V, 2004. Irritable bowel syndrome: in search of an etiology: role of Blastocystis hominis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 70 :383–385.
- 35↑
Tan TC, Suresh KG, 2006. Amoeboid form of Blastocytis hominis—a detailed ultrastructural insight. Parasitol Res 99 :737–742.
- 36↑
Tan TC, Suresh KG, Thong KL, Smith HV, 2006. PCR fingerprinting of Blastocytis isolated from symptomatic and asymptomatic human hosts. Parasitol Res 99 :459–465.
- 37↑
Yoshigawa H, Abe N, Wu Z, 2004. PCR-based identification of zoonotic isolates of Blastocystis from mammals and birds. Microbiol 150 :1147–1151.
- 38↑
Noël C, Dufernez F, Gerbod D, Edgcomb VP, Delgado-Viscogliosi P, Ho LC, Singh M, Wintjens R, Sogin ML, Capron M, Pierce R, Zenner L, Viscogliosi E, 2005. Molecular phylogenies of Blastocystis isolates from different hosts: implications for genetic diversity, identification of species, and zoonosis. J Clin Microbiol 43 :348–355.
- 39↑
Iguchi A, Ebisu A, Nagata S, Saitou Y, Yoshikawa H, Iwatani S, Kimata I, 2007. Infectivity of different genotypes of human Blastocystis hominis isolates in chickens and rats. Parasitol Int 56 :107–112.
- 40↑
Rajah Salim H, Suresh Kumar G, Vellayan S, Mak JW, Khairul Anuar A, Init I, Vennila GD, Saminathan R, Ramakrishnan K, 1999. Blastocystis in animal handlers. Parasitol Res 85 :1032–1033.
- 41↑
Zaki M, Zaman V, Sheikh NA, 1996. Resistance of Blastocystis hominis cysts to chlorine. J Pak Med Assoc. 46 :178–179.
- 42↑
Savioli L, Smith H, Thompson A, 2006. Giardia and Cryptosporidium join the ‘Neglected Diseases Initiative’. Trends Parasitol 22 :203–208.