Toxoplasma gondii is a nearly ubiquitous organism that infects humans, other mammals, and birds. However, only members of the cat family (Felidae) are the definitive host and shed the environmentally resistant oocyst form of the organism in their feces. Transmission to humans usually occurs by ingestion of cysts in undercooked meat and exposure to soil and water contaminated by oocysts. In rare cases, transmission by transfusion or organ transplantation has been reported. In general, humans are thought to be infected for life with cysts forming in the muscles, brain, and other organs, and IgG antibody production is thought to be lifelong. Human infections are usually asymptomatic or cause a self-limited illness with symptoms such as fever and lymph node enlargement. However, severe neurologic and ocular disease can occur with congenital infection and in immune-suppressed persons (usually reactivated disease). In addition, ocular disease has been estimated to occur in up to 2% of persons with normal immunity that are infected with T. gondii after birth.1 It is not yet known if chronic infection with T. gondii has other significant health-related consequences. Researchers are examining the effects of chronic T. gondii infection on reaction time,2 tendency for accidents,3 behavior,4–7 and mental illness.8–11
The prevalence of T. gondii varies greatly in populations throughout the world (from < 10% to > 90%) and is thought to be affected by food-production practices, water treatment, climate, topography, soil- and cat feces-related hygiene, occupational and non-occupational soil exposure, and culinary practices.12–19 In the United States, there are an estimated 400–4000 congenital infections per year,20 up to 1.26 million cases of ocular disease,1 and numerous cases of encephalitis and other systemic illnesses in immune-suppressed persons. Regardless of the source of infection, a reduction in the prevalence of T. gondii infection in the population will lead to many fewer cases of debilitating disease. In this study, we sought to determine the recent prevalence of T. gondii infection in the United States and compare it with that from a prior decade.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
To monitor the prevalence of T. gondii infection in the United States, we tested sera collected in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for the 6-year period from 1999 through 2004 and compared it to data from NHANES III (conducted from 1988 through 1994). The NHANES is a cross-sectional survey conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) based on a stratified, multistage probability cluster design from which a sample of the civilian, noninstitutionalized U.S. population is drawn. The NHANES collects representative health statistics on a variety of health measures and conditions through household interviews, standardized physical examinations, and collection of blood samples in mobile examination centers. Data has been collected continuously since 1999 and released in 2-year cycles. Non-Hispanic blacks, Mexican Americans, adolescents of age 12–19 years, low-income persons, and persons age 60 and older are over-sampled to ensure adequate sample size. For the T. gondii antibody prevalence evaluation, we tested persons of age 6–49 years. Descriptions of the survey design and sampling methods have been published elsewhere.21,22 NHANES III and NHANES 1999–2004 were reviewed by the NCHS Institutional Review Board and included written informed consent.
Variables used in data analysis were categorized as follows: age was grouped as 6–11, 12–19, 20–29, 30–39, and 40–49 years; however, in comparisons of NHANES 1999–2004 to NHANES III (1988–1994), the 6–11 year age group was excluded because a representative sample of sera for this age group was not available for testing for T. gondii in NHANES III. Race/ethnicity was defined by self-report as non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, or Mexican American. Persons who did not select one of these groups were categorized as “Other” and were only included when all racial/ethnic groups were combined. Poverty index was calculated by dividing the total family income by the U.S. poverty threshold, adjusted for family size.
When comparing the NHANES III (1988–1994) prevalence to the NHANES 1999–2004 prevalence we examined only the U.S.-born population because this group more accurately represents transmission of T. gondii in the U.S. This is because in many countries outside the U.S., a relatively high percentage of persons are infected at an early age18,23 and therefore are already infected when immigrating to the U.S. A high prevalence of infection is found in many areas of Mexico and Latin America,18,23 and 65% of the NHANES 1999–2004 non-U.S.-born persons ages 6–49 years are from Mexico. Programs designed to prevent T. gondii infection in the U.S. cannot be monitored accurately by evaluating the prevalence in foreign-born persons with the NHANES because of this high rate of infection that occurs before immigration.
Laboratory testing.
All serum samples were tested using the Platelia Toxo-G enzyme immunoassay kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, California) according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer during each time period (as a result of the manufacturer’s testing and determination of threshold values for the kits, samples with > 6 IU were considered positive for T. gondii antibodies during the time of NHANES III,24 and samples with ≥ 10 IU were considered positive for T. gondii antibodies during the time of NHANES 1999–2004). To ensure that the change in threshold values did not have a large effect on our results, we recalculated the NHANES 1999–2004 prevalence values using the previous NHANES III cutoff value (see Discussion). The Platelia Toxo-G kit was evaluated at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) using a battery of 90 sera (23 negative and 67 positive) and found to have a sensitivity and specificity of 100% when compared with the CDC Toxoplasma immunofluorescence assay-immunoglobulin G test (with 3 discrepant samples resolved by the Sabin—Feldman dye test [Dr. Jack Remington, Palo Alto, CA]).
Statistical analysis.
All prevalence estimates were weighted to represent the total U.S. population and to account for over-sampling and nonresponse to the household interview and physical examinations.25 SUDAAN, a family of statistical procedures for analysis of data from complex sample surveys, was used for data analysis.26 Prevalence estimates were age-adjusted to the 2000 U.S. population by the direct method for both the NHANES 1999–2004 and the NHANES III samples when seroprevalence was compared across population subgroups.
Standard error estimates were calculated using the Taylor series linearization method in SUDAAN to account for the complex sample design.26,27 A t statistic with the combined standard error was used to test differences in prevalence between NHANES III and NHANES 1999–2004. Because multiple comparisons were performed, P values ≤ 0.01 were considered significant. The linear test for trend with age was conducted with orthogonal polynomial contrasts in SUDAAN using both the original age groupings as well as recategorizing into evenly spaced age groups across the age range 6–49 years. To identify independent predictors of seropositivity among U.S.-born persons from NHANES 1999–2004, a logistic modeling procedure in SUDAAN was used with a P value of < 0.05 from a Satterthwaite adjusted F statistic considered significant. Odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals were reported for all cofactors that remained in the final model.
RESULTS
Of the 18,433 persons 6–49 years of age selected and interviewed for NHANES 1999–2004, 17,672 (96%) were examined. Of those examined, 15,960 (90%) had sera available for T. gondii antibody testing. The percent tested out of those examined varied with respect to age (lower for 6- to 11-year-olds [82%] as compared with all other age groups [91–94%]), race/ethnicity (lower for non-Hispanic blacks [89%] as compared with non-Hispanic whites and Mexican Americans [both 91%]), foreign birth (lower for those U.S.-born [90%] as compared with non-U.S.-born [91%]), but not sex or poverty.
The overall age-adjusted T. gondii seroprevalence among persons of age 6–49 years was 10.8% (95% CL: 9.6%, 11.9%; Table 1). Among women of age 15–44 years, the age-adjusted seroprevalence was 11.0% (95% CL: 9.5%, 12.4%); 7.7% (95% CL: 6.1%, 9.2%) for U.S.-born women, and 28.1% (95% CL: 23.4%, 32.8%) for foreign-born women. Seroprevalence increased linearly with age (P < 0.001 linear test for trend), was higher among non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans than among non-Hispanic whites (P = 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively), was higher among persons below the poverty level than those at or above the poverty level (P < 0.001), and was higher among foreign-born than U.S.-born persons (P < 0.001; Table 1).
To compare NHANES 1999–2004 to NHANES III (1988–1994), we restricted the analysis to U.S.-born persons age 12–49 years (see Materials and Methods). The T. gondii antibody prevalence was significantly lower in NHANES 1999–2004 than in NHANES III overall (9.0% versus 14.1%, respectively), for all 4 of the age groups, among men and women, among all 3 racial/ethnic groups, and among persons both below and at or above the poverty index level (Table 2). In other words, the reduction in prevalence from NHANES III to NHANES 1999–2004 among 12- to 49-year-old U.S.-born persons was significant for the combined subpopulation (P < 0.001) and all the demographic subgroups (P ≤ 0.01).
In a multivariate logistic model comparing NHANES 1999–2004 to NHANES III among U.S.-born persons of age 12–49 years, controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and poverty index, the odds ratio for the survey cycle was 0.57 (95% CL: 0.46, 0.72; P < 0.001; model not shown in tables), indicating a significant drop in T. gondii prevalence over this ≈10-year period.
It is interesting to note that the T. gondii antibody prevalence in NHANES 1999–2004 among U.S.-born Mexican Americans age 12–49 years was lower than that of U.S.-born non-Hispanic white persons (Table 2). This finding is in direct contrast to the relationship between these two racial/ethnic groups seen in Table 1 (ages 6–49 years), which included both U.S.-born and foreign-born persons, because the age-adjusted seroprevalence was much lower among U.S.-born Mexican Americans (ages 6–49 years) 4.6% (95% CL: 3.2%, 6.0%) than foreign-born Mexican Americans 21.4% (95% CL: 18.5%, 24.4%; data not shown in tables).
T. gondii antibody prevalence for the NHANES 1999–2004 U.S.-born population increased linearly with age for each of the three racial/ethnic groups (P < 0.001, linear test for trend; Figure 1). All age groups from 6 to 49 years were used in this figure because no comparison to NHANES III was being made.
In a multivariate logistic model for the NHANES 1999–2004 U.S.-born population that included age group, sex, race/ ethnicity, and poverty index, T. gondii antibody prevalence increased with age group (P < 0.001), was lower in Mexican Americans than in non-Hispanic white persons (P = 0.001), and was higher in persons below the poverty index than in those at or above it (P < 0.01; Table 3).
DISCUSSION
In NHANES 1999–2004, we found an overall age-adjusted prevalence of 10.8% among persons in the U.S. age 6–49 years. In addition, we saw a 36% reduction in T. gondii prevalence from 14.1% to 9.0% among 12- to 49-year-old U.S.-born persons since the NHANES III was conducted in 1988–1994. This reduction in prevalence is likely to be partially due to a reduction of T. gondii in cysts in meat through the efforts of meat producers.13,28 In addition, the reduction could be due in part to the intensified education of physicians and the public since the 1990s by CDC and other federal agencies about how to prevent T. gondii infection through the proper cooking of meat, proper cat feces/soil-related hygiene, not feeding cats raw meat, and keeping cats indoors. The reduction in T. gondii seroprevalence is not due to fewer cats in the U.S. because the number of cats per capita has increased.29,30 Other food-related factors that could influence trends in T. gondii exposure include growth in the frozen pre-prepared meal and frozen meat markets31 (because T. gondii cysts are usually inactivated by deep freezing)32,33 and use of enhancement solutions in pork containing 2% sodium chloride or ≥ 1.4% potassium or sodium lactate that suppress T. gondii.34 Future meat surveys would be useful to monitor T. gondii contamination in meat. In addition, water-related factors could influence T. gondii exposure.35 Regulations in the 1990s for enhanced filtering and treatment of drinking water to reduce Giardia intestinalis and Cryptosporidium spp. would reduce the likelihood of T. gondii contamination as well.36,37 Home water filtering and ingestion of bottled water could also reduce the possibility of T. gondii ingestion.
One interesting finding in the survey is that the overall T. gondii antibody prevalence was markedly higher among Mexican Americans than non-Hispanic whites (13.7% versus 8.7%, 6–49 years, age-adjusted; Table 1), but when the data were restricted to the U.S.-born population, Mexican Americans had a markedly lower prevalence than non-Hispanic whites (4.6% [95% CL: 3.2%, 6.0%] versus 8.1% [95% CL: 6.5%, 9.7%], respectively, 6–49 years, age-adjusted; data not shown in tables for U.S.-born population in this age range). As would be expected from the findings above, the T. gondii antibody prevalence was much lower among U.S.-born Mexican Americans than among foreign-born Mexican Americans (4.6% [95% CL: 3.2%, 6.0%] versus 21.4% [95% CL: 18.5%, 24.4%], 6–49 years age-adjusted; data not shown in tables). The reason that U.S.-born Mexican Americans have the lowest T. gondii infection rate of the three major racial/ethnic groups examined is not known but may be due to culinary practices, such as thoroughly cooking meat, and a reduced ability of T. gondii to survive in the environment in the regions of the country where Mexican Americans primarily live. Of the 4 regions of the U.S., over half (55.3%) of Mexican Americans reside in the more arid Western United States,38 a region where T. gondii may not survive as well in the soil.
Regardless of the source of infection, it is notable that T. gondii prevalence increased in the childbearing years (Figure 1), a finding that is of concern because it is new T. gondii infections in pregnant women that lead to congenital toxoplasmosis. This finding remains when controlling for demographic factors and poverty level in multivariate analysis. To prevent congenital toxoplasmosis, prevention of T. gondii infection is important in the childbearing years.
Because the manufacturer of the Toxoplasma IgG serologic testing kit changed the cutoff value for a positive test between NHANES III and NHANES 1999–2004 (from > 6 IU to ≥ 10 IU), we used their recommended cutoff values for each survey when doing the analysis for this paper. However, to be certain that a change in the cutoff value for a positive test would not markedly affect the results, we recalculated the prevalence values for NHANES 1999–2004 using the previous NHANES III cutoff value (i.e., we used > 6 IU instead of ≥ 10 IU). Using the > 6-IU cutoff in the comparison of NHANES 1999–2004 to NHANES III, only 106 out of all 15,960 NHANES 1999–2004 samples and only 62 out of the 10,477 U.S.-born 12- to 49-year-old persons’ samples were affected, the T. gondii seropositivity rate only changed from 9.0% to 9.6% (age-adjusted, 12–49 years old U.S. born), and the reduction in T. gondii seropositivity from NHANES III to NHANES 1999–2004 remained significant at the P < 0.001 level. Therefore, the manufacture’s change in the cutoff value for a positive test had little affect on our results.
The strengths of our study include the utilization of a representative sample of the U.S. population collected through well-standardized methods and the use of the same T. gondii antibody-detection kit for both surveys, allowing a direct comparison of the results. Because the NHANES sample was designed to provide national estimates, it was not statistically possible to stratify the data by states or localities to obtain prevalence rates for specific areas. Estimates by census region also were unstable because of the sampling frame of the survey. In addition, race/ethnicity, birth origin, and socioeconomic data were self-reported and not verified by independent methods. Some of the overall reduction in T. gondii prevalence among U.S.-born persons from NHANES III to NHANES 1999–2004 can be attributed to a change in demographics, for example, non-Hispanic black persons had the highest T. gondii antibody prevalence of the U.S.-born racial/ ethnic groups, and the proportion of U.S.-born non-Hispanic blacks decreased from 39.6% in NHANES III to 30.8% in NHANES 1999–2004. However, a significant reduction occurred in each racial ethnic group from NHANES III to NHANES 1999–2004, including non-Hispanic blacks (Table 2). In spite of these limitations, our data were collected by one of the most representative surveys ever conducted in the U.S. and provide the best available estimates of T. gondii seroprevalence trends.
The NHANES has made it possible to determine how often one of the most intriguing protozoan parasites infects persons in the U.S. There are still many questions about the implications of T. gondii infection. For example, specific genetic types may be more likely to cause ocular or congenital disease.39,40 Much more research into these areas is required before we fully understand the molecular and pathophysiologic effects of this highly successful parasite on those infected in the population.
Toxoplasma gondii prevalence by age group and age-standardized* by sex, race/ethnicity, poverty index, and birth origin (NHANES 1999–2004)
Category | N | Prevalence | 95% CL† |
---|---|---|---|
* All categories except age groups are age-standardized to the 2000 U.S. Census population. | |||
† CL, confidence limits. | |||
‡ The sample size for the total population is greater than the sum for the 3 racial/ethnic groups because the total population includes individuals who classified themselves in the “other” racial/ethnic group. | |||
§ Poverty index and birth origin categories do not sum to total due to non-response. | |||
Age group (years) | |||
6–11 | 2,673 | 3.6 | 2.4, 4.9 |
12–19 | 6,332 | 5.8 | 4.7, 6.8 |
20–29 | 2,449 | 10.1 | 8.1, 12.1 |
30–39 | 2,272 | 14.3 | 12.3, 16.4 |
40–49 | 2,234 | 15.7 | 13.7, 17.7 |
Sex | |||
Male | 7,731 | 11.6 | 10.1, 13.2 |
Female | 8,229 | 9.9 | 8.7, 11.2 |
Race/ethnicity‡ | |||
White, not hispanic | 5,464 | 8.7 | 7.2, 10.1 |
Black, not Hispanic | 4,408 | 12.1 | 9.9, 14.4 |
Mexican American | 4,917 | 13.7 | 11.4, 16.1 |
Poverty index§ | |||
Below | 4,170 | 14.5 | 12.4, 16.5 |
At or above | 10,618 | 9.9 | 8.6, 11.2 |
Birth origin§ | |||
U.S. | 12,944 | 8.2 | 6.8, 9.5 |
Other | 2,974 | 24.8 | 21.2, 28.5 |
Overall | 15,960 | 10.8 | 9.6, 11.9 |
Toxoplasma gondii prevalence in U.S.-born persons by age groups (age, 12–49 years) and age-standardized* by gender, race/ethnicity, and poverty index (NHANES III 1988–1994 and NHANES 1999–2004)
NHANES III 1988–1994 | NHANES 1999–2004 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Category | n | Prevalence | 95% CL† | n | Prevalence | 95% CL | P value |
* All categories except age groups are age-standardized to the 2000 U.S. Census population. | |||||||
† CL, confidence limits. | |||||||
‡ Poverty index does not sum to total due to non-response. | |||||||
Age group (year) | |||||||
12–19 | 2,348 | 7.6 | 5.5, 9.7 | 5,360 | 4.5 | 3.4, 5.6 | 0.01 |
20–29 | 2,223 | 12.4 | 9.4, 15.5 | 1,812 | 6.7 | 4.6, 8.8 | < 0.01 |
30–39 | 2,222 | 13.8 | 12.3, 15.3 | 1,648 | 10.5 | 8.4, 12.6 | 0.01 |
40–49 | 1,813 | 20.7 | 17.9 23.4 | 1,657 | 12.7 | 10.4, 14.9 | < 0.001 |
Sex | |||||||
Male | 3,865 | 14.8 | 12.9, 16.7 | 4,962 | 9.8 | 8.0, 11.6 | < 0.001 |
Female | 4,741 | 13.4 | 11.6, 15.1 | 5,515 | 8.2 | 6.6, 9.8 | < 0.001 |
Race/ethnicity | |||||||
White, not Hispanic | 3,178 | 14.2 | 12.4, 16.0 | 4,525 | 8.8 | 7.2, 10.5 | < 0.001 |
Black, not Hispanic | 3,406 | 16.1 | 14.3, 17.8 | 3,222 | 11.5 | 8.8, 14.3 | < 0.01 |
Mexican American | 1,879 | 10.2 | 8.3, 12.1 | 2,212 | 5.1 | 3.4, 6.7 | < 0.001 |
Poverty index‡ | |||||||
Below | 2,031 | 20.1 | 16.9, 23.4 | 2,375 | 11.3 | 8.6, 14.1 | < 0.001 |
At or above | 6,024 | 13.4 | 11.8, 15.1 | 7,405 | 8.4 | 7.0, 9.8 | < 0.001 |
Overall | 8,606 | 14.1 | 12.7, 15.5 | 10,477 | 9.0 | 7.5, 10.4 | < 0.001 |
Multivariate logistic model for Toxoplasma gondii infection, U.S.-born persons from NHANES 1999–2004 (ages, 6–49 years, N = 11,445 for logistic analysis)
Category | OR (95% CL)* | P value |
---|---|---|
* OR, odds ratio; CL, confidence limits. | ||
† Ref., reference group. | ||
‡ NS, not statistically significant (P > 0.01). | ||
§ “Other” race/ethnicity group not included in model. | ||
Age group (years) | ||
6–11 | Ref.† | |
12–19 | 1.3 (0.9, 1.9) | NS‡ |
20–29 | 2.0 (1.5, 2.9) | < 0.001 |
30–39 | 3.8 (2.7, 5.3) | < 0.001 |
40–49 | 4.3 (2.9, 6.4) | < 0.001 |
Sex | ||
Male | 1.3 (1.0, 1.6) | NS |
Female | Ref. | |
Race/ethnicity§ | ||
White, not Hispanic | Ref. | |
Black, not Hispanic | 1.3 (0.9, 1.7) | NS |
Mexican American | 0.55 (0.4, 0.8) | 0.001 |
Poverty index | ||
Below | 1.4 (1.1, 1.8) | < 0.01 |
At or above | Ref. |

Toxoplasma gondii IgG antibody prevalence by age and race/ethnicity, U.S.-born persons, NHANES 1999–2004, N = 12,274 (racial/ethnic groups combined).
Citation: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Am J Trop Med Hyg 77, 3; 10.4269/ajtmh.2007.77.405

Toxoplasma gondii IgG antibody prevalence by age and race/ethnicity, U.S.-born persons, NHANES 1999–2004, N = 12,274 (racial/ethnic groups combined).
Citation: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Am J Trop Med Hyg 77, 3; 10.4269/ajtmh.2007.77.405
Toxoplasma gondii IgG antibody prevalence by age and race/ethnicity, U.S.-born persons, NHANES 1999–2004, N = 12,274 (racial/ethnic groups combined).
Citation: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Am J Trop Med Hyg 77, 3; 10.4269/ajtmh.2007.77.405
Address correspondence to Jeffrey L. Jones, Division of Parasitic Diseases, National Center for Zoonotic, Vectorborne, and Enteric Diseases, CCID, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mail-stop F-22, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Atlanta, GA. E-mail: jljl@cdc.gov
Authors’ addresses: Jeffrey L. Jones, Division of Parasitic Diseases, National Center for Zoonotic, Vectorborne, and Enteric Diseases, CCID, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mailstop F-22, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Atlanta, GA 30341-3724, Telephone: +1 (770) 488-7771, Fax: +1 (770) 488-7761, E-mail: jlj1@cdc.gov. Deanna Kruszon-Moran, Division of Health and Nutrition Examination Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, HYAT Bldg. IV, Rm. 4308, MS P08, Hyattsville, MD 20782, Telephone: +1 (301) 458-4328, Fax: +1 (301) 458-4029, E-mail: ddk0@cdc.gov. Kolby Sanders-Lewis and Marianna Wilson, Division of Parasitic Diseases, National Center for Zoonotic, Vectorborne, and Enteric Diseases, CCID, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mailstop F-36, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Atlanta, GA 30341-3724, Phone: +1 (770) 488-4431, Fax: +1 (770) 488-3115, E-mail: myw1@cdc.gov.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Erica Christian and Christopher Burns for their technical assistance with T. gondii serologic testing.
Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Health and Human Services or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
REFERENCES
- 1↑
Holland GM, 2003. Ocular toxoplasmosis: a global reassessment, part 1: epidemiology and course of disease. Am J Ophthalmol 136 :973–988.
- 2↑
Havlíc ek J, Gašová Z, Smith AP, Zvára K, Flegr J, 2001. Decrease of psychomotor performance in subjects with latent “asymptomatic” toxoplasmosis. Parasitology 122 :515–520.
- 3↑
Flegr J, Havlicek J, Kodym P, Maly M, Smahel Z, 2002. Increased risk of traffic accidents in subjects with latent toxoplasmosis: a retrospective case-control study. BMC Infect Dis 2 :11.
- 4↑
Flegr J, Zitkova S, Kodym P, Frynta D, 1996. Induction of changes in human behaviour by the parasitic protozoan Toxoplasma gondii. Parasitology 113 :49–54.
- 5
Flegr J, Kodym P, Tolarova V, 2000. Correlation of duration of latent Toxoplasma gondii infection with personality changes in women. Biol Psychol 53 :57–68.
- 6
Lafferty KD, 2005. Look what the cat dragged in: do parasites contribute to human cultural diversity? Behav Process 68 :279–282.
- 7↑
Lafferty KD, 2006. Can the common brain parasite, Toxoplasma gondii, influence human culture? Proc Biol Sci 273 :2749–2755.
- 8↑
Yolken RH, Brachmann S, Rouslanova I, Lillehoj E, Ford G, Torrey EF, Schroeder J, 2001. Antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii in individuals with first-episode schizophrenia. Clin Infect Dis 32 :842–844.
- 9
Flegr J, Preiss M, Klose J, Havlicek J, Vitakova M, Kodym P, 2003. Decreased level of psychobiological factor novelty seeking and lower intelligence in men latently infected with the protozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii Dopamine, a missing link between schizophrenia and toxoplasmosis? Biol Psychol 63 :253–268.
- 10
Brown AS, Schaefer CA, Quesenberry CP Jr, Liu L, Babulas VP, Susser ES, 2005. Maternal exposure to toxoplasmosis and risk of schizophrenia in adult offspring. Am J Psychiatry 162 :767–773.
- 11↑
Brachmann S, Schroder J, Bottmer C, Torrey EF, Yolken RH, 2005. Psychopathology in first-episode schizophrenia and antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii. Psychopathology 38 :87–90.
- 13↑
Weigel RM, Dubey JP, Seigel AM, Heofling D, Reynolds D, Herr L, Kitron UD, Shen SK, Thulliez P, Fayer R, Todd KS, 1995. Prevalence of antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii in swine in Illinois in 1992. J Am Vet Med Assoc 206 :1747–1751.
- 14
Bowie WR, King AS, Werker DH, Isaac-Renton JL, Bell A, Eng SB, Marion SA, 1997. Outbreak of toxoplasmosis associated with municipal drinking water. Lancet 350 :173–177.
- 15
Bahia-Oliveira LM, Jones JL, Azevedo-Silva J, Vlves CCF, Orefice F, Addiss DG, 2003. Highly endemic, waterborne toxoplasmosis in North Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis 9 :55–62.
- 16
Cook AJ, Gilbert RE, Buffolano W, 2000. Sources of Toxoplasma infection in pregnant women: European multicentre case-control study. European Research Network on Congenital Toxoplasmosis. BMJ 321 :142–147.
- 17
Roghmann MC, Faulkner CT, Lefkowitz A, Patton S, Zimmerman J, Morris JG Jr, 1999. Decreased seroprevalence for Toxoplasma gondii in Seventh Day Adventists in Maryland. Am J Trop Med Hyg 60 :790–792.
- 18↑
Dubey JP, Beattie CP, 1988. Toxoplasmosis in man (Homo sapiens). Dubey JP, Beattie CP, eds. Toxoplasmosis of Animals and Man. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Inc., 41–60.
- 19↑
Walton BC, Arjona I, Benchoff BM, 1966. Relationship of Toxoplasma antibodies to altitude. Am J Trop Med Hyg 15 :492–495.
- 20↑
Lopez A, Dietz V, Wilson M, Navin TR, Jones JL, 2000. Preventing congenital toxoplasmosis. MMWR Recomm Rep 49(RR-2): 37–75.
- 21↑
National Center for Health Statistics, 1994. Plan and operation of the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–94. Series 1: programs and collection procedures. Vital Health Stat 1(32): 1–407.
- 22↑
National Center for Health Statistics, 2004. NHANES 1999–2002.http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhanes/datalink.htm. Accessed November 1, 2006.
- 23↑
Tenter AM, Heckeroth AR, Weiss LM, 2000. Toxoplasma gondii: from animals to humans. Int J Parasitol 30 :1217–1258.
- 24↑
Jones JL, Kruszon-Moran D, Wilson M, McQuillan G, Navin T, McAuley JB, 2001. Toxoplasma gondii infection in the United States: seroprevalence and risk factors. Am J Epidemiol 154 :357–365.
- 25↑
Mohadjer L, Montaquila J, Waksberg J, 1996. National Health and Nurtition Examination Survey III: Weighting and Examination Methodology. Prepared for National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD. Washington, DC: Westat Inc.
- 26↑
Shah BV, Barnwell BG, Bieler GS, LaVange LM, 1996. SUDAAN Users’ Manual, Release 7.0. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.
- 27↑
National Center for Health Statistics, 2004. NHANES 1999–2002.http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes_general_guidelines_june_04.pdf. Accessed November 1, 2006.
- 28↑
Dubey JP, Hill DE, Jones JL, Hightower AW, Kirkland E, Roberts JM, Marcet PL, Lehmann T, Vianna MCB, Miska K, Sreekumar C, Kwok OCH, Shen SK, Gamble HR, 2005. Prevalence of viable Toxoplasma gondii in beef, chicken, and pork from retail meat stores in the United States: risk assessment to consumers. J Parasitol 91 :1082–1093.
- 29↑
The Wildlife Society, 2006. Wildlife Policy Statement—Feral and Free-Ranging Domestic Cats.http://www.wildlife.org/policy/index.cfm?tname=policystatements&statement=ps28. Accessed November 1, 2006.
- 30↑
Coleman JS, Temple SA, Craven SR, 1997. Cats and Wildlife: A Conservation Dilemma. University of Wisconsin Extension, Madison, WI. http://wildlife.wisc.edu/extension/catfly3.htm. Accessed November 1, 2006.
- 31↑
American Frozen Food Institute. Frozen food trends. http://www.affi.com/factstat-trends.asp. Accessed May 11, Cats and Wildlife: A Conservation Dilemma. University of Wisconsin Extension, Madison, WI. http://wildlife.wisc.edu/extension/catfly3.htm. Accessed November 1 2007.
- 32↑
Dubey JP. 1974. Effect of freezing on the infectivity of Toxoplasma cysts to cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 165 :534–536.
- 33↑
Kotula AW, Dubey JP, Sharar AK, Andrews CD, Shen SK, Lindsay DS, 1991. Effect of freezing on infectivity of Toxoplasma gondii tissue cysts in pork. J Food Prot 54 :687–690.
- 34↑
Hill DE, Sreekumar C, Gamble HR, Dubey JP, 2004. Effect of commonly used enhancement solutions on the viability of Toxoplasma gondii tissue cysts in pork loin. J Food Prot 67 :2230–2233.
- 36↑
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1990. Drinking Water Standards for Regulated Contaminants. Surface Water Treatment Rule (1990, effective date).http://www.epa.gov/safewater/therule.html#Surface. Accessed May 25, 2007.
- 37↑
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1998. Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule, EPA 815-F-98-009, December 1998. http://www.epa.gov/safewater/mdbp/ieswtr.html. Accessed May 25, 2007.
- 38↑
U.S. Census Bureau, 2001. Hispanic Population Census Brief, May 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
- 39↑
Grigg ME, Ganatra J, Boothroyd JC, Margolis TP, 2001. Unusual abundance of atypical strains associated with human ocular toxoplasmosis. J Infect Dis 184 :633–639.
- 40↑
Darde ML, 2004. Genetic analysis of the diversity in Toxoplasma gondii. Ann Ist Super Sanita 40 :57–63.