Progress Toward Onchocerciasis Elimination in Brazil

João Luiz Pereira de Araujo Brazilian Ministry of Health, Secretary of Health and Environment Surveillance, Boa Vista, Brazil;

Search for other papers by João Luiz Pereira de Araujo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Dalila Ríos Onchocerciasis Elimination Program for the Americas, Carter Center Guatemala Office, Guatemala City, Guatemala;

Search for other papers by Dalila Ríos in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Maria Eugenia Grillet Laboratorio de Biología de Vectores y Parásitos, Instituto de Zoología y Ecología Tropical, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela;

Search for other papers by Maria Eugenia Grillet in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Alda Maria da Cruz Brazilian Ministry of Health, Secretary of Health and Environment Surveillance, Boa Vista, Brazil;
Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/FIOCRUZ and Medical School Faculty/Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil;

Search for other papers by Alda Maria da Cruz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Lindsay Rakers The Carter Center, Atlanta, Georgia;

Search for other papers by Lindsay Rakers in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Frank Richards The Carter Center, Atlanta, Georgia;

Search for other papers by Frank Richards in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Heriberto Francis Schuertz Brazilian Ministry of Health, Secretary of Health and Environment Surveillance, Boa Vista, Brazil;

Search for other papers by Heriberto Francis Schuertz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Sandra Maria Barbosa Durães Brazilian Ministry of Health, Secretary of Health and Environment Surveillance, Boa Vista, Brazil;
Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Search for other papers by Sandra Maria Barbosa Durães in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

ABSTRACT.

The single onchocerciasis-endemic focus in the remote Amazon rainforest is shared by Brazil and Venezuela and affects primarily the indigenous Yanomami people. Regional elimination of onchocerciasis is challenged by the magnitude and inaccessibility of this area. In Brazil, 272 onchocerciasis-endemic communities are operationally organized through 21 health centers (“polos bases”). Mass drug administration of ivermectin began in 1995, with 36 effective biannual rounds (≥85% coverage of the eligible population) through 2022. The national on chocerciasis program maintains community-level monitoring to prioritize treatment activities and epidemiological surveys. The Onchocerciasis Elimination Program for the Americas and the WHO onchocerciasis elimination guidelines have helped Brazil move toward its goal of stopping ivermectin treatment by 2025 and verifying transmission elimination by 2030. Additional challenges to the Brazilian onchocerciasis program include cross-border movements and insecurity due to illegal mining and inter-community conflicts. The new government in Brazil offers hope given its commitment to the equity of indigenous people and preservation of the Amazon environment.

INTRODUCTION

Human onchocerciasis is a chronic infection caused by the Onchocerca volvulus parasite, which is transmitted through the bites of Simulium blackflies that breed in fast-flowing rivers.1 This neglected tropical disease is a leading infectious cause of blindness in the world2 and is commonly known as river blindness.2 In Brazil, onchocerciasis transmission takes place within the indigenous homeland of the Yanomami people, where the Amazonian forest landscape is composed of both low-lying plains and towering mountains in the northernmost states of Roraima and Amazonas.

The dense forest and rivers with rapids and waterfalls make access to onchocerciasis-endemic Yanomami villages extremely difficult. The highest endemicity occurs in villages located in the Parima Mountains, near the Venezuelan border. In fact, there is a contiguous zone of cross-border disease transmission shared by the Brazilian Focus and Venezuela’s South Focus, and this represents a major challenge for the goal of eliminating onchocerciasis: Transmission must also be interrupted in the neighboring country’s territory to achieve the goal of eliminating the disease in each country. The Brazilian Focus (the country’s only endemic focus) includes 18,815 inhabitants residing in 272 communities organized within a protected national reserve, categorized according to the baseline prevalence of onchocerciasis into hyperendemic (≥60% microfilaridermia prevalence), mesoendemic (20–59%), and hypoendemic (1–19%) areas (Figure 1).3

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Brazilian onchocerciasis endemic focus demography in 2022 by baseline endemicity. Baseline (pre-treatment) endemicity was classified as follows: hyperendemic (≥60% microfilaridermia prevalence), mesoendemic (20–59%), and hypoendemic (1–19%). Hyper = hyperendemic; Hypo = hypoendemic; Meso = mesoendemic.

Citation: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 111, 3_Suppl; 10.4269/ajtmh.23-0749

The Yanomami people are the largest indigenous group in the Amazon Region,4 preserving their traditional way of life despite substantial outside exposure and pressure.4,5 They are a hunter-gatherer society that is distinct genetically, anthropometrically, and linguistically from neighboring indigenous peoples. They inhabit the Amazon rainforest, covering approximately 74,132 square miles across Brazil and Venezuela, with their territory on the Brazilian side stretching from Roraima’s Branco River basins to the left bank of the Negro River in Amazonas state.6,7 Healthcare for all indigenous populations in the Amazon Region of Brazil is provided by about 280 Ministry of Health staff organized into multidisciplinary health teams that are based in core health centers (“polos bases”) located throughout the region. The teams, which include indigenous members, rotate into and out of the polos bases throughout the year (30 days of service and 15 days off), arriving first by plane or helicopter and from there walking or going by boat to the communities to deliver primary health services.

The elimination strategy of the Onchocerciasis Elimination Program for the Americas (OEPA), which Brazil has adopted, is to eliminate the eye and skin disease produced by O. volvulus and interrupt its transmission through effective mass drug administration (MDA) of ivermectin (Mectizan®, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ) in all endemic areas of the Americas.8 Here, ≥85% of the eligible population per treatment round is considered “effective.” Treatment rounds are provided at least twice per year (every 6 months or semiannually). Pregnant women, women in the first week of lactation, persons with chronic debilitating diseases, and young children (<90-cm height, <5 years old, and <15-kg body weight) are not eligible for treatment. Onchocerciasis was formerly prevalent in six countries in the Americas, but with the successful implementation of the OEPA’s strategy, the WHO has verified the elimination of disease in four of them (Colombia, Ecuador, Guatemala, and Mexico), and the only remaining endemic at-risk population resides in the Yanomami Focus Area, composed of the Brazilian Focus and Venezuela’s South Focus.9

Onchocerciasis treatment in the Brazilian Focus was launched in 1995 with technical support from the OEPA, which has been supporting other program activities in Brazil since 1993.10 The treatment rounds have been provided semiannually except from 2011 to 2017, when the Brazilian onchocerciasis program increased to four rounds per year in an effort to accelerate the elimination process. However, the Brazilian onchocerciasis program encountered great logistical difficulties reaching effective coverage in all four rounds, so in 2018 the treatment strategy reverted to semiannual treatment cycles. Thirty-six effective rounds have been recorded in the Brazilian Focus, as shown in Figure 2. Figure 2 also suggests that MDA has had the expected impact of decreasing the prevalence of microfilaridermia among a convenience sample of all age groups from a baseline of 63.3% in 1995 to 2.5% in 2016 (unpublished data, Brazilian Ministry of Health). This decrease reflects the strong microfilaricide effect of ivermectin. From 2019 to 2021, there was a decrease in treatment coverage because of the COVID-19 pandemic’s disruption of programmatic activities,11 and in 2022, coverage was low owing to a problem with the importation of ivermectin. As a result, the 85% target has not been met for the past 3 years (Figure 2).

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Mass drug administration treatment coverage by year and semiannual cycle (C1, C2) and microfilaridermia prevalence, Brazilian Focus, 1995–2022. Prevalence of microfilaridermia was based on a convenience sample of all age groups. The numbers of persons examined and the number and locations of communities/polo bases sampled are unavailable.

Citation: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 111, 3_Suppl; 10.4269/ajtmh.23-0749

The Brazilian program is actively working to regain effective treatment levels and execute new strategies to enhance program activities in locations where onchocerciasis transmission continues. One approach has been to develop a community-level database. From the beginning, the smallest endemic administrative unit for MDA and epidemiological survey indicators was the polo base, which is the operational unit of primary healthcare in the field. Under the new strategy, MDA and epidemiological indicators have moved from the polo base administrative unit to the community level. Starting in 2013, the Brazilian onchocerciasis program has recorded epidemiological coverage and indicators by community as well as by polo base and overall focus. The Brazilian onchocerciasis program also has historical records by community starting in mid-2010. These data have allowed a calculation of how many communities have achieved a satisfactory cumulative count of effective rounds likely to interrupt transmission, which the OEPA defines as being ≥20. Communities with an accumulated count falling below 10 effective treatment rounds are classified as super-critical, indicating a need for immediate attention and intervention to provide effective rounds in all future MDA cycles. Communities with a count between 11 and 19 cycles are considered critical, requiring close monitoring and support to improve their performance.

The Brazilian onchocerciasis program’s new approach also includes categorizing communities by logistical variables, as shown in Table 1: community population size, means of transportation, distance for health teams, etc. Most communities are small and distant from the health centers and require helicopter access. Local factors (external to the community itself) also affect the performance and achievement of the Brazilian onchocerciasis program’s goals, such as the presence of illegal mining and inter-community conflicts, requiring qualified sociological and anthropological approaches for the region and population’s features. Categorizing communities using variables related to these local factors enables the Brazilian onchocerciasis program to obtain a concise overview, which aids in better directing human and material resources for operational and supervisory purposes. However, the Brazilian onchocerciasis program depends on government policies or inter-institutional assistance to solve problems such as conflicts and illegal mining. The presence of these variables can significantly influence the ability to conduct healthcare interventions in specific communities. In 2022, more than 20,000 illegal gold miners were estimated to be in the Yanomami area; these largely nonindigenous Brazilians can greatly hinder the onchocerciasis program. Miners are usually armed and suspicious of outsiders and hinder health team movements. Illegal mining has severe consequences for the social dynamics of indigenous communities, including alcohol introduction, violent encounters, the introduction of transmissible infectious diseases such as malaria, river contamination with heavy metals, and the destruction of native vegetation. Inter-community conflicts between the Yanomami pose security risks to health teams and may force them from certain areas, thereby disrupting healthcare interventions and reducing treatment coverage. The presence of conflicts also threatens the safety of health professionals, necessitating evacuations until stability has been restored. Identifying affected communities becomes crucial for service planning, presenting challenges in providing essential care.

Table 1

Distribution of communities and population by data categories in the Brazilian Focus

Data Category Communities (N = 272) Population (N = 18,815) Communities (%) Population (%)
Effective Treatment Rounds*
 >20 rounds 159 11,169 58.5 59.4
 11–19 81 5,633 29.8 29.9
 0–10 32 2,013 11.8 10.7
Community Population
 1–50 134 3,686 49.3 19.6
 51–99 74 5,441 27.2 28.9
 100 or More 64 9,688 23.5 51.5
Baseline Endemicity
 Hyperendemic 124 8,047 45.6 42.8
 Mesoendemic 75 5,289 27.6 28.1
 Hypoendemic 73 5,479 26.8 29.1
Distance for Health Teams
 Far 146 9,821 53.7 52.2
 Intermediate 41 2,875 15.1 15.3
 Near 85 6,119 31.3 32.5
Means of Transportation
 Walking 96 7,110 35.3 37.8
 Boat 60 3,851 22.1 20.5
 Aircraft 46 3,318 16.9 17.6
 Boat and Walking 21 1,914 7.7 10.2
 Aircraft and Walking 49 2,622 18.0 13.9
Cross-Border Migration
 No 199 13,489 73.2 71.7
 Yes 73 5,326 26.8 28.3
Illegal Mining Presence
 No 215 15,216 79.0 80.9
 Yes 57 3,599 21.0 19.1
Inter-Community Conflicts
 No 156 11,279 57.4 59.9
 Yes 116 7,536 42.6 40.1

Effective rounds mean ≥85% ivermectin coverage of the eligible population.

Hyperendemic (≥60% microfilaridermia prevalence), mesoendemic (20–59%), and hypoendemic (1–19%).

Because of the longevity and goals of the Brazilian onchocerciasis program and despite the challenges described above, it is very important to launch epidemiological and entomological assessments that follow WHO guidelines for determining when MDA can be safely stopped. These include 1) replacement of microfilaremia monitoring by more sensitive serological testing of children for recent exposure to the parasite by collecting and processing capillary blood-filter paper samples to detect Ov-16 antibodies and 2) vector collections. Some of the preliminary and encouraging serological results from these new evaluations were reported in the Weekly Epidemiological Record in 2023.12 Vectors that have been collected are undergoing taxonomic identification to determine the predominant vector species in various subfocus zones, and as recommended by the WHO, molecular processing of blackfly head pools for O. volvulus DNA using the O-150 polymerase chain reaction method is ongoing.9

With a new government in place that is focusing on respect for indigenous peoples and preservation of the Amazon rainforest, the Brazilian onchocerciasis program is hopeful that in the coming years, there will be new resources, improved security, national and local political commitments, and enhanced program staff morale and determination. The Brazilian onchocerciasis program envisions that it is possible to achieve and sustain high levels of ivermectin MDA treatment coverage to stop MDA throughout the focus in 2025 and achieve verification of elimination by the WHO by 2030, thereby promoting regional equity in public health for the Yanomami.

REFERENCES

  • 1.

    Rey L , 2013. Bases da Parasitologia Médica (3rd ed.). Ebook. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Guanabara Koogan.

  • 2.

    Murdoch ME , 2021. Mapping the burden of onchocercal skin disease. Br J Dermatol 184: 199207.

  • 3.

    Coelho GE , Vieira JBF , García-Zapata MTA , Schuertz JC , 1998. Identifying areas of epidemiological stratification in an onchocerciasis focus in Yanomami territory, Roraima, Brazil [in Portuguese]. Cad Saude Publica 14: 607611.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Ramos AR , 1984. Ethnic categories of Sanuma thought: Intra and inter-ethnic contrasts [in Portuguese]. Série Antropologia 45: 119.

  • 5.

    Kopenawa D , Albert B , 2015. A Queda do Céu: Palavras de um Xamã Yanomami. São Paulo, Brazil: Companhia das Letras.

  • 6.

    Albert B , Barbosa RI , Ferreira EJG & Castellón EG Homem, Ambiente e Ecologia no Estado de Roraima. Manaus, Brazil: INPA.

  • 7.

    Albert B , Milliken W , 2009. Urihi A – A Terra-Floresta Yanomami. São Paulo, Brazil: ISA.

  • 8.

    Blanks J et al., 1998. The onchocerciasis elimination program for the Americas: A history of partnership. Rev Panam Salud Publica 3: 367374.

  • 9.

    World Health Organization , 2020. Onchocerciasis: Guidelines for Stopping Mass Drug Administration and Verifying Elimination of Human Onchocerciasis: Criteria and Procedures. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/204180/9789241510011_eng.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed August 2, 2023.

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Shelley AJ , 2002. Human onchocerciasis in Brazil: An overview. Cad Saude Publica 18: 11671177.

  • 11.

    World Health Organization , 2021. Progress in eliminating onchocerciasis in the WHO Region of the Americas: Disruption of ivermectin mass drug administration in the Yanomami focus area due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 96: 477484.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    World Health Organization , 2023. Progress in eliminating onchocerciasis in the WHO Region of the Americas: Advances towards interrupting the transmission of onchocerciasis from the latest preliminary serological assessments conducted in parts of the Yanomami Focus Area, 2018–2022. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 98: 453457.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Author Notes

Financial support: The OEPA is supported by the U.S. Agency for International Development’s (USAID’s) Achieve Onchocerciasis Elimination in the Americas (Achieve OEA) program led by the Carter Center.

Current contact information: João Luiz Pereira de Araujo, Heriberto Francis Schuertz, and Sandra Maria Barbosa Durães, Brazilian Ministry of Health, Secretary of Health and Environment Surveillance, Department of Communicable Diseases, General Surveillance Coordination for Disease Elimination, Boa Vista, Brazil, E-mails: joaol.araujo@saude.gov.br, heriberto.schuertz@saude.gov.br, and sandra.duraes@saude.gov.br. Dalila Ríos, The Carter Center’s Onchocerciasis Elimination Program for the Americas, Guatemala City, Guatemala, E-mail: drios@oepa.net. Maria Eugenia Grillet, Institute of Zoology and Tropical Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, Central University of Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela, E-mail: mariaeugenia.grillet@gmail.com. Alda Maria da Cruz, Brazilian Ministry of Health, Secretary of Health and Environment Surveillance, Department of Communicable Diseases, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, E-mail: alda.cruz@saude.gov.br. Lindsay Rakers and Frank Richards, The Carter Center, Atlanta, GA, E-mails: lindsay.rakers@cartercenter.org and frank.richards@cartercenter.org.

Address correspondence to João Luiz Pereira de Araujo, Brazilian Ministry of Health, Secretary of Health and Environment Surveillance, Department of Communicable Diseases, General Surveillance Coordination for Disease Elimination, Rua Cecília Brasil, 1043- Centro, Boa Vista, Roraima, Brasil CEP 69301-080. E-mail: joaol.araujo@saude.gov.br
  • Figure 1.

    Brazilian onchocerciasis endemic focus demography in 2022 by baseline endemicity. Baseline (pre-treatment) endemicity was classified as follows: hyperendemic (≥60% microfilaridermia prevalence), mesoendemic (20–59%), and hypoendemic (1–19%). Hyper = hyperendemic; Hypo = hypoendemic; Meso = mesoendemic.

  • Figure 2.

    Mass drug administration treatment coverage by year and semiannual cycle (C1, C2) and microfilaridermia prevalence, Brazilian Focus, 1995–2022. Prevalence of microfilaridermia was based on a convenience sample of all age groups. The numbers of persons examined and the number and locations of communities/polo bases sampled are unavailable.

  • 1.

    Rey L , 2013. Bases da Parasitologia Médica (3rd ed.). Ebook. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Guanabara Koogan.

  • 2.

    Murdoch ME , 2021. Mapping the burden of onchocercal skin disease. Br J Dermatol 184: 199207.

  • 3.

    Coelho GE , Vieira JBF , García-Zapata MTA , Schuertz JC , 1998. Identifying areas of epidemiological stratification in an onchocerciasis focus in Yanomami territory, Roraima, Brazil [in Portuguese]. Cad Saude Publica 14: 607611.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Ramos AR , 1984. Ethnic categories of Sanuma thought: Intra and inter-ethnic contrasts [in Portuguese]. Série Antropologia 45: 119.

  • 5.

    Kopenawa D , Albert B , 2015. A Queda do Céu: Palavras de um Xamã Yanomami. São Paulo, Brazil: Companhia das Letras.

  • 6.

    Albert B , Barbosa RI , Ferreira EJG & Castellón EG Homem, Ambiente e Ecologia no Estado de Roraima. Manaus, Brazil: INPA.

  • 7.

    Albert B , Milliken W , 2009. Urihi A – A Terra-Floresta Yanomami. São Paulo, Brazil: ISA.

  • 8.

    Blanks J et al., 1998. The onchocerciasis elimination program for the Americas: A history of partnership. Rev Panam Salud Publica 3: 367374.

  • 9.

    World Health Organization , 2020. Onchocerciasis: Guidelines for Stopping Mass Drug Administration and Verifying Elimination of Human Onchocerciasis: Criteria and Procedures. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/204180/9789241510011_eng.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed August 2, 2023.

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Shelley AJ , 2002. Human onchocerciasis in Brazil: An overview. Cad Saude Publica 18: 11671177.

  • 11.

    World Health Organization , 2021. Progress in eliminating onchocerciasis in the WHO Region of the Americas: Disruption of ivermectin mass drug administration in the Yanomami focus area due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 96: 477484.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    World Health Organization , 2023. Progress in eliminating onchocerciasis in the WHO Region of the Americas: Advances towards interrupting the transmission of onchocerciasis from the latest preliminary serological assessments conducted in parts of the Yanomami Focus Area, 2018–2022. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 98: 453457.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Past two years Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 619 619 260
PDF Downloads 338 338 131
 
 
 
 
Affiliate Membership Banner
 
 
Research for Health Information Banner
 
 
CLOCKSS
 
 
 
Society Publishers Coalition Banner
Save