INTRODUCTION
Typhoid fever is endemic in the island nation of Samoa, in Oceania. Approximately 2–4% of untreated acute Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar Typhi (S. Typhi) infections, clinical or subclinical, become “chronic carriers” who excrete for more than 12 months, and typically for decades.1,2 Moreover, 80–90% of known chronic carriers have gallstones and harbor S. Typhi in their gallbladder.3,4
In addition to systemic improvements to water and sanitation infrastructure, a new tool to help control endemic typhoid fever is Vi conjugate vaccine. A single dose of Typbar-TCV®, the first prequalified Vi conjugate, was 79–95% effective in preventing typhoid fever following immunization of infants, children, and young adults.5–10 However, even if high vaccination coverage substantially reduces the incidence of typhoid,5–10 for some years chronic S. Typhi carriers will remain within the population constituting a reservoir of infection that can be transmitted. Ideally, chronic carriers can be systematically identified (by stool culture and IgG Vi antibody titer) and treated if the antimicrobial susceptibility of the endemic strain(s) allows.11–13 Of note, in adults recently vaccinated with Vi-conjugate vaccine, Vi serology is unlikely to be useful in screening for chronic carriers.
Samoa has initiated a Typhoid Fever Control Program with: 1) a Preparatory Phase based on enhanced epidemiologic surveillance and strengthening of microbiology infrastructure to elucidate the disease burden by person, place, and time, 2) an Attack Phase that includes a mass vaccination with Typbar-TCV targeting all Samoans 1–45 years of age and introduction of Typbar-TCV into the Expanded Program on Immunization as a routine vaccine for infants co-administered with measles/mumps/rubella (MMR) vaccine, and 3) a future Consolidation Phase with intensive searches to identify and treat chronic carriers.14
Changes in diet and lifestyle in Samoa have led to rises in noncommunicable diseases, including obesity and metabolic syndrome,15–22 known risk factors for development of gallstones.23,24 This could impact typhoid fever control if the prevalence of chronic carriers were to increase commensurate with a rise in the prevalence of gallstones.3,4,25–29 The Samoa Typhoid Fever Control Program is exploring strategies to detect, cure, and monitor chronic carriers.3,4,11,12,25–29 Typhoid Epidemiologic SWAT Teams visit the households (or school or workplace, as relevant) of every blood culture-confirmed typhoid case to perform an epidemiologic investigation that includes the collection of three stool cultures from every household contact to identify individuals who may be asymptomatically excreting S. Typhi. Two indicators that increase the likelihood that an excretor is a true chronic S. Typhi carrier are the presence of gallstones,4 and a highly elevated serum IgG Vi antibody titer (found in 85–90% of chronic carriers but uncommonly in the general population).12,25,27,28
Recognizing that 80–90% of chronic S. Typhi carriers have cholelithiasis,3,4 we assessed the feasibility of a practical, noninvasive, field ultrasound method to identify gallstones in Samoan adults during the course of Typhoid Epidemiologic SWAT Team investigations of households of acute typhoid cases, and for future population-based surveys among older Samoan adults. The former will help identify carriers who may have transmitted S. Typhi to a household member, whereas the population-based surveys will help identify individuals with cholelithiasis who will become targets for additional studies (multiple stool cultures and Vi serology) to identify silent chronic carriers in the general population and certain subpopulations (e.g., individuals used as food handlers). Identifying individuals with cholelithiasis may have enhanced importance as a greater proportion of Samoan adults become vaccinated with Typbar-TCV, after which Vi serology will have reduced utility for screening.
Ultrasound screening of the right upper quadrant of the abdomen is sensitive and specific for identifying gallstones,30 including when performed with point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) devices, a methodology particularly attractive for low- and middle-income country (LMIC)-settings.31 Conventional ultrasound machines require multiple probes to image different regions of the body. We chose the Butterfly iQ® portable ultrasound probe because of its “all-in-one” design, compatibility with Apple and Android tablets/phones, and lower cost than conventional portable units.
Comparisons between nonexpert and expert POCUS operators to diagnose cholelithiasis have reported a high diagnostic accuracy, even when performed by nonexpert operators, with a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 88%.32 In our pilot study of the feasibility of utilizing POCUS to detect adults with gallstones in Samoa, two physicians who were nonexperts in performing and interpreting abdominal ultrasound received minimal POCUS training, before screening Samoan adults for cholelithiasis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ultrasound.
Typhoid Epidemiologic SWAT Team investigations of typhoid case households must be performed as soon as possible after confirmation of a case. Because many Samoans live in rural isolated villages or households that cannot be readily accessed by vehicle during rainy months and must be reached on foot, a lightweight, compact, highly portable ultrasound device was selected for evaluation. This POCUS probe (Butterfly iQ, Butterfly Network, Inc., manufactured 2019) and its proprietary imaging software for use on the Apple iPad (iPad 9.7-inch 6th Gen 128GB model A1954) were used to screen subjects for gallstones in both the short-axis/out-of-plane view (wherein the image is perpendicular to the course of the gallbladder) and the long-axis/in-plane view (the image is parallel to the course of the gallbladder), and with the subject in supine and left lateral decubitus positions (Figure 2). Images and videos were saved to Butterfly Network’s privacy-compliant server for later review (Figure 3).
Nonexpert POCUS operators.
The nonexpert clinicians who received brief training in POCUS were a third-year U.S. internal medicine resident (S.A.H., who participated in a general clinical ultrasound workshop at the 2014 American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Annual Meeting), and a pediatric infectious diseases specialist (S.N.D.). Each nonexpert received approximately 2 hours of practical hands-on training of ultrasonography of the right-upper quadrant of the abdomen. Using both traditional and handheld POCUS devices under supervision, the nonexperts were instructed how to identify and characterize the gross morphology of the gallbladder, detect gallbladder wall thickening, and determine the contents of the gallbladder such as gallstones or biliary sludge. These skills were practiced on subjects in the supine and left lateral decubitus positions.
Cohorts screened with POCUS by the nonexperts.
Three cohorts of indigenous Samoans were screened for gallstones by the two nonexpert clinicians using POCUS. The clinicians took turns performing POCUS scans on alternating patients. They thereupon jointly evaluated their scans (including saved image stills and video) for the presence or absence of gallstones, and recorded their consensus diagnoses.
Cohort 1.
(N = 28) was a convenience sample from 200 Samoans who had been screened as potential food handlers for employment during The Pacific Games, a sporting competition among the Pacific Island nations held every 4 years and hosted in Apia, Samoa, from July 7 to 20, 2019. The Ministry of Health considered it important that these individuals be carefully screened to detect possible silent typhoid carriers among them, lest such an individual inadvertently spread S. Typhi to visiting team members or visitors during the Games. Accordingly, the Samoa Ministry of Health required that each individual seeking employment as a food handler for the games be screened by having three stools or rectal swabs shown to be negative for S. Typhi and a serum IgG Vi antibody test that did not show a high titer—all food handlers tested negative. A convenience sample comprising 28 accessible screened food handlers underwent POCUS several weeks after completion of the Pacific Games.
Cohort 2.
(N = 20) comprised two adults with blood culture-confirmed typhoid fever diagnosed during August 2019, and 18 of their household contacts.
Cohort 3.
(N = 72) comprised healthy, asymptomatic individuals > 20 years of age, who volunteered to have POCUS of the gallbladder performed at one of four outpatient clinics (three on Upolu and one on Savaii). In these outpatient clinics, a flyer (in the Samoan language) was posted at the check-in counter 3 days in advance to alert outpatients and their accompanying family members and companions of the impending POCUS screening days.
Prior to initiation of POCUS, participating individuals signed an informed consent translated into Samoan and read to the volunteer by a Samoan member of the team. The study protocol was reviewed and deemed exempt by the University of Maryland Baltimore (UMB) Institutional Review Board (IRB: HP-00087816), “UMB IRB reviewed the information provided and has determined the submission does not require IRB review. This determination has been made with the understanding that the proposed project does not involve a systematic investigation designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge OR a human participant.” Subjects were informed that although they may not have evidence of a gallstone on POCUS, they may subsequently develop gallbladder illness at a later point in life. Thus, the exam performed in this screening exercise should not take the place of a medical doctor’s formal evaluation of any abdominal issues, should such arise.
Expert adjudication by a radiologist of the POCUS scans/videos obtained by the nonexperts.
All 120 scans were independently reviewed by a board-certified radiologist (G.F.) at Tupua Tamasese Meaole Hospital in Samoa. The radiologist was provided the login to the online Butterfly Network account associated with the Samoa Typhoid Fever Control Program to access the uploaded scans for review. Each scan was de-identified in terms of patient information and results (i.e., initial interpretations by the nonexpert operators). First, the radiologist evaluated if the scan was technically suitable to be interpreted for the presence of gallstones. The radiologist thereupon scored each technically suitable POCUS scan as positive or negative for gallstones. After the radiologist’s interpretations of all the technically suitable POCUS scans were recorded, they were compared with those of the nonexperts. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of nonexpert POCUS results were calculated using the radiologist’s diagnosis as the gold standard for the presence/absence of gallstones.
Testing POCUS subjects with cholelithiasis for S. Typhi infection.
When cholelithiasis was identified in an asymptomatic individual who had not previously undergone screening for S. Typhi carriage, the individual was offered fecal cultures to detect S. Typhi. Had any participants been culture-positive, they would have been offered a 28-day course of ciprofloxacin and monitored for “cure” of carriage by a Typhoid Epidemiologic SWAT team.33 The monitoring would involve collection of fecal specimens every 3–6 months until 12 months after the first positive culture. If the individual persisted in excreting S. Typhi even after attempted eradication with a 4-week course of ciprofloxacin, monitoring would continue with additional cultures circa every 6 months.
Statistical analysis.
Confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using MedCalc Software Ltd. diagnostic test evaluation calculator (https://www.medcalc.org/calc/diagnostic_test.php; Version 20.009). “Exact” Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals based on the exact binomial distribution.34
RESULTS
The workflow of this pilot evaluation of POCUS in the field to identify Samoan adults with gallstones is summarized in Figure 1. Of the 120 adults in the three cohorts who had POCUS scans performed by the two nonexpert operators, 24 (20%) were adjudicated by the expert radiologist as uninterpretable, leaving 96 interpretable scans. Scans were deemed uninterpretable primarily because of operator technique in failing to provide clear images of the gallbladder. The most common reason cited by the radiologist was “rapid operator movement” in which the nonexpert’s scan was performed at a speed too fast to provide high-quality images. The radiologist also noted that on some scans there were portions of the gallbladder where stones tend to reside (e.g., the neck of the gallbladder) that were not clearly profiled.
The age group and sex of the 96 adults in the cohorts with interpretable scans and results of readings of the nonexperts are summarized in Table 1. Among the 96 (80%) scans of interpretable quality, the nonexperts correctly identified six of the seven Samoans that the radiologist diagnosed as having gallstones (Figure 3), thus exhibiting a sensitivity of 85.7% (95% CI, 42.1–99.6) (Table 2). The nonexperts correctly identified 85 of 89 scans that were determined by the radiologist to be negative for gallstones, yielding a specificity of 95.5% (95% CI, 88.9–98.8) (Table 2). A POCUS scan performed and interpreted by nonexperts had a positive predictive value that a subject truly has gallstones of 60% (95% CI, 35.5–80.4), and a negative predictive value that gallstones are truly not present of 98.8% (95% CI, 93.3–99.8).
The prevalence of gallstones detected using a POCUS device among 96 of 120 Samoan women and men whose POCUS scans performed by nonexperts were deemed by a radiologist to be technically interpretable
All cohorts combined | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age (yrs) | Females (n) | Gallstones (n) | % Positive | Males (n) | Gallstones (n) | % Positive | F + M (N) | Gallstones (N) | % Positive |
20–39 | 9 | 1 | 11.1 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 1 | 5 |
40–59 | 23 | 3 | 13 | 20 | 1 | 5 | 43 | 4 | 9.3 |
60–79 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 13.3 | 31 | 2 | 6.5 |
≥ 80 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 49 | 4 | 8.2 | 47 | 3 | 6.4 | 96 | 7 | 7.3 |
Food handlers (Cohort 1) | |||||||||
20–39 | 4 | 1 | 25 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 7.7 |
40–59 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
60–79 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
≥ 80 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 9 | 1 | 11.1 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 1 | 4.5 |
Acute typhoid cases and their household contacts (Cohort 2) | |||||||||
20–39 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
40–59 | 3 | 1 | 33 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 20 |
60–79 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
≥ 80 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 9 | 1 | 11.1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 7.1 |
Among outpatients and accompanying persons (Cohort 3) | |||||||||
20–39 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
40–59 | 16 | 2 | 12.5 | 14 | 1 | 7.1 | 30 | 3 | 10 |
60–79 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 15.4 | 25 | 2 | 8 |
≥ 80 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 31 | 2 | 6.5 | 29 | 3 | 10.3 | 60 | 5 | 8.3 |
POCUS = point-of-care ultrasound
Sensitivity and specificity of nonexpert versus expert diagnosis of gallstones using POCUS among 96 subjects with interpretable scans
Presence of gallstones as confirmed by the board-certified radiologist | |||
---|---|---|---|
Positive | Negative | ||
Presence of gallstones as detected by nonexpert POCUS operators | Positive | 6a | 4b |
Negative | 1c | 85d | |
Sensitivity and Specificity of nonexpert POCUS screen | Sensitivity: 85.7% (95% CI, 42.1–99.6%) | Specificity: 95.5% (95% CI, 88.9–98.8%) | |
Sensitivity is defined as a/(a + c) | Specificity is defined as b/(b + d) |
POCUS = point-of-care ultrasound
Among the 22 food handlers (Cohort 1) with scans deemed interpretable by the radiologist, one 37-year-old female had gallstones detected by the radiologist, but this woman’s scan was read as negative by the nonexperts; this individual was the one false negative.
Individuals in Cohort two with interpretable scans included two acute cases and 12 contacts. Neither of the typhoid fever patients, a 52-year-old female and a 31-year-old male, had gallstones. The 12 household contacts comprised eight females (30–72 years of age) and four males (45–79 years of age) (Table 1). One 49-year-old female was positive for gallstones; her three stool cultures did not grow S. Typhi. Thus, 1/14 (7.1%) acute cases of typhoid and their associated household contacts had gallstones.
Of the 60 patients, family members, and companions who availed themselves of the screening offered at routine outpatient health visits (Cohort 3) and who had scans deemed interpretable, 31 were females (20–80 years of age) and 29 were males (39–85 years of age) (Table 1). Among these, 2/31 (6.5%) females and 3/29 (10.3%) males had scans positive for gallstones (Table 1). Thus, overall, 5/60 (8.3%) of Cohorts 3 had gallstones.
DISCUSSION
In our pilot study of the feasibility and applicability of portable, hand-held POCUS in the Samoan setting to detect gallstones among adults, nonexpert operators with minimal training were able to diagnose cholelithiasis with reasonably high sensitivity (85.7%) and high specificity (95.5%) among 96 scans of readable quality. These results closely mirror previously reported data on the ability of nonexpert operators to diagnose cholelithiaisis.32 The training of our nonexpert operators focused primarily on the diagnosis of cholelithiasis and less so on proper digital image recording for storage and future analysis. Additionally, the brief POCUS training did not include a large mixed population of female and male practice subjects with variable BMIs, and individuals known to harbor gallstones, sludge, or chronically inflamed biliary mucosa.
The percentage (20%) of scans deemed by a radiologist experienced in POCUS to be uninterpretable indicates that the nonexpert operators need additional training to improve their POCUS technique and mastery of the ultrasound software. Nevertheless, the fact that 80% of the POCUS scans performed by operators with minimal training were interpretable engenders optimism that with additional training the proportion of interpretable scans will increase. Perhaps more important is that in reviewing the interpretable scans the minimally trained clinicians did remarkably well in differentiating subjects with gallstones from those without.
To our knowledge this is the first report of the prevalence of gallstones in Samoans and in household contacts of typhoid fever patients in Samoa. However, this preliminary study is limited by a small sample size and a nonrandom approach to enrollment into the three cohorts, which together preclude analysis for demographic patterns or broad conclusions regarding the overall prevalence of gallstones in Samoa. Despite these limitations, the Ministry of Health has deemed the pilot to be sufficiently encouraging such that additional ultrasound probes have been acquired to create a cadre of Samoan clinicians who can undergo intensive training by radiologists and skilled technicians. We intend to undertake a future larger survey to assess the prowess of more highly trained Samoan POCUS operators. If a cadre of skilled POCUS operators gains sufficient proficiency, they will participate in Samoa Typhoid Epidemiologic SWAT Team activities. We envision that handheld POCUS will play a key role in active population-based screening of Samoans > 45 years of age to identify persons with cholelithiasis who will thereupon be further tested with stool cultures and Vi serology to detect chronic S. Typhi carriers, as part of the Consolidation Phase of the Samoa Typhoid Fever Control Program.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Gretchen Dimling, BA, RDMS for additional ultrasound training and tips at her beautiful farm in Maryland.
REFERENCES
- 1.↑
Ledingham JCG, Arkwright JA , 1912. The Carrier Problem in Infectious Diseases. London, United Kingdom: E. Arnold.
- 2.↑
Browning CH, Coulthard HL, Cruickshank R, Guthrie KJ, Smith RP , 1933. Chronic Enteric Carriers and Their Treatment. London, United Kingdom: His Majesty’s Stationery Office, 7–19.
- 3.↑
Vogelsang TM, Boe J , 1948. Temporary and chronic carriers of Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella paratyphi B. J Hyg (Lond) 46: 252–261.
- 4.↑
Schiøler H, Christiansen ED, Høybye G, Rasmussen SN, Greibe J , 1983. Biliary calculi in chronic Salmonella carriers and healthy controls: a controlled study. Scand J Infect Dis 15: 17–19.
- 5.↑
Shakya M et al.2019. Phase 3 efficacy analysis of a typhoid conjugate vaccine trial in Nepal. N Engl J Med 381: 2209–2218.
- 6.↑
Qadri F et al.2021. Protection by vaccination of children against typhoid fever with a Vi-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine in urban Bangladesh: a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet 398: 675–684.
- 7.↑
Yousafzai MT et al.2021. Effectiveness of typhoid conjugate vaccine against culture-confirmed Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi in an extensively drug-resistant outbreak setting of Hyderabad, Pakistan: a cohort study. Lancet Glob Health 9: e1154–e1162.
- 8.↑
Shakya M et al.2021. Efficacy of typhoid conjugate vaccine in Nepal: final results of a phase 3, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health 9: e1561–e1568.
- 9.↑
Patel PD et al.2021. Safety and efficacy of a typhoid conjugate vaccine in Malawian children. N Engl J Med 385: 1104–1115.
- 10.↑
Vadrevu KM, Raju D, Rani S, Reddy S, Sarangi V, Ella R, Javvaji B, Mahantshetty NS, Battu S, Levine MM , 2021. Persisting antibody responses to Vi polysaccharide-tetanus toxoid conjugate (Typbar TCV®) vaccine up to 7 years following primary vaccination of children 2 years of age with, or without, a booster vaccination. Vaccine 39: 6682–6690.
- 11.↑
Ferreccio C, Berríos G, Levine M, García J, Silva W, Rodríguez H , 1988. Typhoid fever in Santiago: the role of food handlers at elementary schools. Rev Med Chil 116: 952–956.
- 12.↑
Ferreccio C, Levine M, Astroza L, Berrios G, Solari V, Misraji A, Pefaur C , 1990. The detection of chronic Salmonella Typhi carriers: a practical method applied to food handlers. Rev Med Chil 118: 33–37.
- 13.↑
Lanata CF, Tafur C, Benavente L, Gotuzzo E, Carrillo C , 1990. Detection of Salmonella Typhi carriers in food handlers by Vi serology in Lima, Peru. Bull Pan Am Health Organ 24: 177–182.
- 14.↑
Sikorski MJ et al.2020. Tenacious endemic typhoid fever in Samoa. Clin Infect Dis 71: S120–S126.
- 15.↑
Collins VR, Dowse GK, Toelupe PM, Imo TT, Aloaina FL, Spark RA, Zimmet PZ , 1994. Increasing prevalence of NIDDM in the Pacific Island population of western Samoa over a 13-year period. Diabetes Care 17: 288–296.
- 16.↑
Ezeamama AE, Viali S, Tuitele J, McGarvey ST , 2006. The influence of socioeconomic factors on cardiovascular disease risk factors in the context of economic development in the Samoan archipelago. Soc Sci Med 63: 2533–2545.
- 17.↑
Keighley ED, McGarvey ST, Turituri P, Viali S , 2006. Farming and adiposity in Samoan adults. Am J Hum Biol 18: 112–122.
- 18.↑
Keighley ED, McGarvey ST, Quested C, McCuddin C, Viali S, Maga UA, Ohtsuka R, Ulijaszek SJHealth Change in the Asia-Pacific Region. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 147–191.
- 19.↑
Friedman JE, Kurtis JD, McGarvey ST , 2007. The dual burden of infectious and non-communicable diseases in the Asia-Pacific region: examples from the Philippines and the Samoan islands. Med Health R I 90: 346–350.
- 20.↑
Hawley NL, Wier LM, Cash HL, Viali S, Tuitele J, McGarvey ST , 2012. Modernization and cardiometabolic risk in Samoan adolescents. Am J Hum Biol 24: 551–557.
- 21.↑
Hawley NL, Minster RL, Weeks DE, Viali S, Reupena MS, Sun G, Cheng H, Deka R, McGarvey ST , 2014. Prevalence of adiposity and associated cardiometabolic risk factors in the Samoan genome-wide association study. Am J Hum Biol 26: 491–501.
- 22.↑
Lin S, Naseri T, Linhart C, Morrell S, Taylor R, McGarvey ST, Magliano DJ, Zimmet P , 2017. Trends in diabetes and obesity in Samoa over 35 years, 1978–2013. Diabet Med 34: 654–661.
- 23.↑
Shaffer EA , 2006. Gallstone disease: epidemiology of gallbladder stone disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 20: 981–996.
- 24.↑
Stinton LM, Myers RP, Shaffer EA , 2010. Epidemiology of gallstones. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 39: 157–169.
- 25.↑
Lanata CF, Levine MM, Ristori C, Black RE, Jimenez L, Salcedo M, Garcia J, Sotomayor V , 1983. Vi serology in detection of chronic Salmonella Typhi carriers in an endemic area. Lancet 2: 441–443.
- 26.↑
Engleberg NC, Barrett TJ, Fisher H, Porter B, Hurtado E, Hughes JM , 1983. Identification of a carrier by using Vi enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay serology in an outbreak of typhoid fever on an Indian reservation. J Clin Microbiol 18: 1320–1322.
- 27.↑
Losonsky GA, Ferreccio C, Kotloff KL, Kaintuck S, Robbins JB, Levine MM , 1987. Development and evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for serum Vi antibodies for detection of chronic Salmonella Typhi carriers. J Clin Microbiol 25: 2266–2269.
- 28.↑
Lin FY, Becke JM, Groves C, Lim BP, Israel E, Becker EF, Helfrich RM, Swetter DS, Cramton T, Robbins JB , 1988. Restaurant-associated outbreak of typhoid fever in Maryland: identification of carrier facilitated by measurement of serum Vi antibodies. J Clin Microbiol 26: 1194–1197.
- 29.↑
Wright PW, Wallace RJ Jr. , Steingrube VA, Gibson JL, Barth SS , 1994. A case of recurrent typhoid fever in the United States: importance of the grandmother connection and the use of large restriction fragment pattern analysis of genomic DNA for strain comparison. Pediatr Infect Dis J 13: 1103–1106.
- 30.↑
Shea JA et al.1994. Revised estimates of diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity in suspected biliary tract disease. Arch Intern Med 154: 2573–2581.
- 31.↑
Becker DM, Tafoya CA, Becker SL, Kruger GH, Tafoya MJ, Becker TK , 2016. The use of portable ultrasound devices in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the literature. Trop Med Int Health 21: 294–311.
- 32.↑
Del Medico M, Altieri A, Carnevale-Maffè G, Formagnana P, Casella F, Barchiesi M, Bergonzi M, Vattiato C, Casazza G, Cogliati C , 2018. Pocket-size ultrasound device in cholelithiasis: diagnostic accuracy and efficacy of short-term training. Intern Emerg Med 13: 1121–1126.
- 33.↑
Ferreccio C, Morris JG, Valdivieso C, Prenzel I, Sotomayor V, Drusano GL, Levine MM , 1988. Efficacy of ciprofloxacin in the treatment of chronic typhoid carriers. J Infect Dis 157: 1235–1239.
- 34.↑
Clopper CJ, Pearson ES , 1934. The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika 26: 404–413.