Response to “Randomized Controlled Trials on COVID-19 Should be Accurate and Trustworthy”

Sherief Abd-Elsalam Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases Department Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University Tanta, Egypt E-mail: sherif.abdelbaky@med.tanta.edu.eg

Search for other papers by Sherief Abd-Elsalam in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Shaimaa Soliman Public Health and Community Medicine Menoufia University Menoufia, Egypt E-mail: shaimaasherif@hotmail.com

Search for other papers by Shaimaa Soliman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Dear Sir,

We thank Ben W. Mol for his comments and questions,1 and appreciate the meticulous reading of our recently published article.2 We agree that randomized controlled trials on COVID-19 should be accurate and trustworthy.

Regarding the first concern, our study started on March 23 and was finalized on June 1, 2020. Patients were monitored for 4 weeks. All data were available by July 1, and we worked to publish our report as quickly as possible to help address controversies regarding use of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19. We are proud that our study was among the early studies that found that hydroxychloroquine has no benefit in the management of COVID-19.2,3

Regarding the second concern about conducting two trials during the same period,4,5 we would like to clarify that we contributed to the multicenter study published in the Archives of Virology, but not the other referenced study. Regarding the third concern, updated information is provided in the clinical trial registry. Also, the sample size determination was provided in the Methods section, and a post hoc sample power analysis was included at the end of the Results section.2

Regarding the fourth concern, most variables were nonparametric, and P values were calculated with the Mann Whitney test; it is not clear how P values could be calculated without the data rank. Regarding the fifth concern, we included median values for some of the nonparametric variables, and this might have caused confusion. Regarding the last concern, the recovery rate is a categorical variable analyzed by the χ2 or Fisher exact test, whereas the other variables considered were continuous and analyzed using the t- or Mann Whitney tests. In our case, the P value for comparing disease severity between groups was 0.06, and all other P values were insignificant as well.

We again thank Ben W. Mol for his great interest in our article.

REFERENCES

  • 1.

    Mol BW. Randomized controlled trials on COVID-19 should be accurate and trustworthy. Am J Trop Med Hyg 105: 1127.

  • 2.

    Abd-Elsalam S, Esmail ES, Khalaf M, Abdo EF, Medhat MA, Abd El Ghafar MS, Ahmed OA, Soliman S, Serangawy GN, Alboraie M, 2020. Hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of COVID-19: a multicenter randomized controlled study. Am J Trop Med Hyg 103: 16351639.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Axfors C et al., 2021. Mortality outcomes with hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in COVID-19 from an international collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials. Nat Commun 12: 2349.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Dabbous HM, Abd-Elsalam S, El-Sayed MH, Sherief AF, Ebeid FFS, El Ghafar MSA, Soliman S, Elbahnasawy M, Badawi R, Tageldin MA, 2021. Efficacy of favipiravir in COVID‐19 treatment: a multi‐center randomized study. Arch Virol 166: 949954.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Dabbous HM et al., 2021. Safety and efficacy of favipiravir versus hydroxychloroquine in management of COVID‐19: a randomised controlled trial. Sci Rep 11: 7282.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 1.

    Mol BW. Randomized controlled trials on COVID-19 should be accurate and trustworthy. Am J Trop Med Hyg 105: 1127.

  • 2.

    Abd-Elsalam S, Esmail ES, Khalaf M, Abdo EF, Medhat MA, Abd El Ghafar MS, Ahmed OA, Soliman S, Serangawy GN, Alboraie M, 2020. Hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of COVID-19: a multicenter randomized controlled study. Am J Trop Med Hyg 103: 16351639.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Axfors C et al., 2021. Mortality outcomes with hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in COVID-19 from an international collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials. Nat Commun 12: 2349.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Dabbous HM, Abd-Elsalam S, El-Sayed MH, Sherief AF, Ebeid FFS, El Ghafar MSA, Soliman S, Elbahnasawy M, Badawi R, Tageldin MA, 2021. Efficacy of favipiravir in COVID‐19 treatment: a multi‐center randomized study. Arch Virol 166: 949954.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Dabbous HM et al., 2021. Safety and efficacy of favipiravir versus hydroxychloroquine in management of COVID‐19: a randomised controlled trial. Sci Rep 11: 7282.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Past two years Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 35829 13754 9
PDF Downloads 266 60 5
 
Membership Banner
 
 
 
Affiliate Membership Banner
 
 
Research for Health Information Banner
 
 
CLOCKSS
 
 
 
Society Publishers Coalition Banner
Save