In 2020, global health education programs, which historically have been highly dependent on international travel, were forced to adapt to sudden restrictions as a result of COVID-19. Responses ranged from halting or limiting activities to transitioning quickly to online platforms.1 As the pandemic changes and programs move forward, it is critical to consider whether some of the adaptations hold valuable lessons for improving the future of global health education. To stimulate widespread programmatic evaluation, we describe our experience adapting the University of Minnesota’s extensive global health education program, including our American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (ASTMH)–accredited Global Health Course, to accommodate COVID-19 restrictions. We describe both our challenges and successes as we seek to improve educational quality, accessibility, and foster community while simultaneously decreasing our environmental impact and ensuring better use of resources. We hope these reflections will be useful for other global health programs, and will stimulate further sharing and dialogue.
Thank you to all the faculty and participants who make these courses possible. Well over 150 faculty members have shared their expertise through our courses. Special thanks to Drs. Randy Hurley at HealthPartners in Minnesota and Furaha Serventi at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre in Tanzania for their assistance with the interactive oncology module shared as a supplement. The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene has waived the Open Access fee for this article due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
Roddy C, Amiet DL, Chung J, Holt C, Shaw L, McKenzie S, Garivaldis F, Lodge JM, Mundy ME, 2017. Applying best practice online learning, teaching, and support to intensive online environments: an integrative review. Front Educ 2: 59.
Means B, Toyama Y, Murphy R, Bakia M, Jones K, 2010. Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies Center for Technology in Learning. Available at: www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/opepd/ppss/reports.html. Accessed June 11, 2021.
Velin L, Lartigue J-W, Johnson SS, Zorigtbaater A, Kanmounye US, Truche P, Joseph MN, 2021. Conference equity in global health: a systematic review of factors impacting LMIC representation at global health conferences. BMJ Glob Health 6: e003455
Bousema T, Selvaraj P, Djimde AA, Yakar D, Hagedorn B, Pratt A, Barret D, Whitfield K, Cohen JM, 2020. Perspective piece reducing the carbon footprint of academic conferences: the example of the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. Am J Trop Med Hyg 103: 1758–1761.
Watts N et al., 2019. The 2019 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: ensuring that the health of a child born today is not defined by a changing climate. Lancet 394: 1836–1878.
Tang L, Ii R, Tokimatsu K, Itsubo N, 2018. Development of human health damage factors related to CO2 emissions by considering future socioeconomic scenarios. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23: 2288–2299.
de Leeuw R, de Soet A, van der Horst S, Walsh K, Westerman M, Scheele F, 2019. How we evaluate postgraduate medical e-learning: systematic review. JMIR Med Educ 5: e13128.
de Leeuw R, Westerman M, Walsh K, Scheele F, 2019. Development of an instructional design evaluation survey for postgraduate medical e-learning: content validation study. J Med Internet Res 21: e13921.
Sinclair P, Kable A, Levett-Jones T, 2015. The effectiveness of Internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database Syst Rev Implement Reports 13: 52–64.
Taveira-Gomes T, Ferreira P, Taveira-Gomes I, Severo M, Ferreira MA, 2016. What are we looking for in computer-based learning interventions in medical education? A systematic review. J Med Internet Res 18: e204.
Roskvist R, Eggleton K, Goodyear-Smith F, 2020. Provision of e-learning programmes to replace undergraduate medical students’ clinical general practice attachments during COVID-19 stand-down. Educ Prim Care 31: 247–254.
Lazzereschi L, Kirtley D, 2021. Provision of e-learning programmes to replace undergraduate medical students’ clinical general practice attachments during COVID-19 stand-down: a student perspective. Educ Prim Care 32: 63.
Alsoufi A et al., 2020. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical education: medical students’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding electronic learning. PLoS One 15: e0242905.
Ahmed SA, Hegazy NN, Abdel Malak HW, Kayser WC III, Elrafie NM, Hassanien M, Al-Hayani AA, El Saadany SA, Ai-Youbi AO, Shehata MH, 2020. Model for utilizing distance learning post COVID-19 using (PACT)TM a cross sectional qualitative study. BMC Med Educ 20: 400.
Coe TM, McBroom TJ, Brownlee SA, Regan K, Bartels S, Saillant N, Yeh H, Petrusa E, Dageforde LA, 2021. Medical students and patients benefit from virtual non-medical interactions due to COVID-19. J Med Educ Curric Dev 8: 23821205211028343.
Nowell L, Lorenzetti D, Jacobsen M, Lorenzetti L, Paolucci EO, 2021. Translating caring competencies to remote working environments: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 11: e048459.
Chasset F, Barral M, Steichen O, Legrand A, 2021. Immediate consequences and solutions used to maintain medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic for residents and medical students: a restricted review. Postgrad Med J.
Stout RC, Roberts S, Maxwell-Scott H, Gothard P, 2021. Necessity is the mother of invention: how the COVID-19 pandemic could change medical student placements for the better. Postgrad Med J 97: 417–422.