INTRODUCTION
Liver enzyme elevations have been recently reported in both Plasmodium falciparum1 and Plasmodium vivax2 malaria volunteer infection studies (VISs), otherwise known as controlled human malaria infection studies. These studies entail intentional infection of healthy volunteers with Plasmodium parasites, by mosquito bites,3 direct injection of sporozoites,4 or by intravenous inoculation of parasitized red blood cells.2,5 The latter bypasses the liver stage of infection and is referred to as the induced blood-stage malaria (IBSM) model. VISs are increasingly being used to evaluate antimalarial vaccine and drug candidates4,6 and have been established for P. falciparum,7 P. vivax,2,8 and Plasmodium malariae.5 However, recent reports of elevated liver enzymes post-treatment have raised concerns related to the safety of healthy volunteers and have the potential to impede antimalarial drug development because of difficulties distinguishing drug-induced liver injury (DILI) from the effect of malaria.
DILI is the most common cause of cessation of development of a new chemical entity (NCE) for safety reasons.9 DILI can be divided into intrinsic injury, which is related to a direct drug effect and is typically dose dependent, and idiosyncratic injury, which occurs in specific susceptible individuals. The latter is typically not dose related and is, therefore, more difficult to predict. Most drugs that cause severe DILI do so infrequently, typically requiring at least a few thousand exposed subjects to demonstrate the effect.9 Therefore, close attention must be paid to lower degrees of DILI during preclinical and clinical drug development. Hence, liver function test (LFT) abnormalities must be carefully evaluated during malaria VISs where an NCE is under development. Incorrect attribution of liver injury to an NCE can lead to cessation of further development; conversely, attributing the liver injury solely to malaria may risk failure to detect DILI. Currently, there is no reliable biomarker to distinguish DILI from other causes of liver injury. Therefore, better understanding of the factors associated with post-treatment LFT abnormalities in malaria VISs is required.
Malaria hepatopathy is a common phenomenon in natural malaria infection, occurring in both P. falciparum and P. vivax infections. It is defined as a bilirubin > 2.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN) and an increase in transaminase > 3 × ULN. These LFT elevations generally peak around the time of diagnosis and before commencement of antimalarial chemotherapy.10–14 By contrast, a distinct pattern of LFT abnormality has been reported in P. falciparum1 and P. vivax VISs.2 This is characterized by transaminase elevation without an increase in bilirubin, with a peak observed approximately 2–6 days post-treatment.15–17 Similar changes have been described in natural P. falciparum18,19and P. vivax infections,18 although they have been reported less commonly than malaria hepatopathy. The differences between the malaria hepatopathy and post-treatment LFT changes suggest that they may be mediated by different mechanisms. The mechanisms underlying post-treatment liver injury are incompletely understood. Possible contributing factors include an increased inflammatory response following malaria treatment, release of hepatotoxic iron products from red cells, oxidative damage, and, potentially, a hepatotoxic effect of antimalarial drugs or other concomitant drug treatment (including acetaminophen).15
The aim of our study was to describe in detail the LFT abnormalities observed in two P. vivax IBSM studies and to evaluate possible risk factors. One of these studies entailed treatment with the investigational antimalarial artefenomel, and the other with the licensed drug chloroquine. Neither artefenomel nor chloroquine has been associated with hepatotoxicity when used as monotherapy in standard dose regimens in healthy adults20–23 or in children with malaria.24 However, post-treatment LFT abnormalities have been reported in malaria patients treated with artefenomel in malaria-endemic settings.25,26 We compared findings from the P. vivax VISs with data from a published phase IIA open-label study of artefenomel treatment of malaria in Thailand25 and from studies of chloroquine or artemisinin combination therapy conducted in Malaysia.27,28
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Subjects and study design.
Data for the P. vivax IBSM analysis were obtained from 32 malaria-naive subjects who participated in two clinical trials at the Queensland Institute of Medical Research (QIMR) Berghofer between March 2016 and April 2017. The results of one of these studies, which used chloroquine29 and artefenomel30 as antimalarial treatment have been published. An article describing the results of the other study (NCT02573857), which used the experimental compound artefenomel as antimalarial treatment, is currently under review. Key details are included in Table 1. Subjects were all healthy adults aged between 18 and 55 years. Subjects with a history or clinical signs of liver disease were excluded. All subjects had alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), and total bilirubin levels within the normal range at baseline. Subjects were inoculated intravenously with the P. vivax isolate HMP-013.29 In the artefenomel study, eight subjects were treated with a single 200 mg dose of the drug 10 days post-inoculation.30 Data from previous studies had indicated that a 200 mg dose would be subcurative,31 and as expected, 7/8 subjects had recrudescent parasitemia; they subsequently received a standard course of artemether/lumefantrine on day 21–28. In the chloroquine study, 24 subjects were treated with a standard 3-day course of chloroquine, totaling 25 mg/kg, beginning on day 8 (n = 8 subjects), day 9 (n = 1 subject), or day 10 (n = 15 subjects). All subjects in the chloroquine study cleared parasites.
Induced blood-stage malaria clinical trials details
| Drug | Artefenomel | Chloroquine | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort (n) | Artefenomel (8) | Chloroquine C1 (8) | Chloroquine C2a (6)† | Chloroquine C2b (2)† | Chloroquine C3 (8) |
| Inoculation dose size (parasites) | 524,000 | 720,000 | 722,000 | 740,000 | 782,000 |
| Treatment regimen | Single dose 200 mg | 3 Days* | 3 Days* | 3 Days* | 3 Days* |
| Day of treatment post-inoculation | Day 10 | Day 8 | Day 10 (one subject treated on day 9) | Day 10 | Day 10 |
| Acetaminophen and/or ibuprofen use | Allowed both | Allowed both, encouraged ibuprofen only, and only reported ibuprofen use | Ibuprofen | Ibuprofen | Acetaminophen |
Three-day standard oral curative treatment regimen dosed on a weight basis to a total of ∼25 mg/kg.
Cohorts 2a and 2b were combined into chloroquine cohort C2 for the statistical analysis as the conduct and characteristics of the cohorts were identical apart from the inoculum dose.
Individual patient-level biochemistry results were made available from a previously published phase IIA open-label study.25 This study had enrolled patients at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases in Bangkok and Shoklo Malaria Research Unit located on the northwestern border of Thailand between October 2010 and May 2012. Data from 41 adult patients with microscopically confirmed P. vivax mono- (n = 40) or mixed infection (n = 1) were analyzed. LFTs were measured before artefenomel treatment, 4 hours post-treatment, and on days 1, 2, and 7.
In the study undertaken in Malaysia, adults and children > 1 year of age with P. vivax monoinfection were enrolled from July 2013 to November 2015 as part of a randomized controlled trial27 or a prospective observational study,28 both conducted at Kota Marudu, Kudat, and Pitas district hospitals. LFTs were undertaken on samples from 85 patients. All had ALT levels tested on days 0 (before treatment) and 7, whereas AST was measured in 19/85 and 85/85 subjects on day 0 and day 7, respectively. Total bilirubin levels were tested in 76/85 subjects on day 0 and 85/85 subjects on day 7.
Parasitemia measurements.
Parasitemia was measured before treatment and at multiple time points throughout the VISs by 18S-qPCR32 and analyzed on the log10 scale. The parasite clearance rate was reported using the parasite clearance half-life (PCt1/2) in hours, as previously reported.33
For the artefenomel VISs, the PCt1/2 was censored at parasitemia nadir, ∼36 hours post-treatment, and before recrudescence. Although chloroquine was administered over 3 days, the initial parasite PCt1/2 was assumed to represent a continuous pharmacodynamic effect.29
A variable was calculated to capture the biomass of parasites cleared in the first 24 hours after treatment. This variable, termed as the parasite clearance burden (PCBpeak-24) was calculated by subtracting the parasitemia at 24 hours posttreatment initiation from the peak parasitemia on the log10 scale and is reported as a log-fold change. The 24-hour cutoff was selected because most parasites were cleared over this interval, yet parasitemia remained measurable. The peak parasitemia occurred at or around the time of treatment for all subjects.
Markers of host response.
Temperature, malaria clinical score, and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured as markers of host response. Temperatures < 37.5°C were considered normal. The malaria clinical score has been developed as a tool for assessing the clinical severity of malaria in IBSM studies34 and forms part of the criteria for treatment initiation (Supplemental Material). The maximum temperature and clinical scores were taken from values recorded within 3 days pre- and post-treatment to ensure the changes were due to malaria infection and treatment and not to an alternative cause.
Laboratory parameters.
LFT and hematology results from the IBSM subjects were taken at screening, pre-inoculation, pre-treatment, 72 hours post-treatment, 5–8 days post-treatment, and at the end of study (EOS). CRP levels were retrospectively measured on a total of 31 stored plasma and 16 stored serum samples in the artefenomel cohort, and 62 stored plasma and serum samples in the chloroquine cohorts. Additional CRP results were available from tests undertaken for clinical assessments. The peak ALT level was assessed as the primary measurement of hepatocyte injury because of its greater liver specificity than AST.35 Peak ALT was categorized into ≥ 2.5 × ULN and < 2.5 × ULN (ULN = 40 IU/L for males and 30 IU/L for females) in line with the World Health Organization guidelines.36
Statistical analysis.
Data were analysed using Stata v.15 (StataCorp 2017, College Station, TX),37 and figures were produced using GraphPad Prism v.8, San Diego, CA.38 Descriptive statistics of frequency and percentage were given for categorical measures, and continuous variables were presented as mean and 95% CI or median and interquartile range (IQR), depending on whether the variable was normally distributed or not. For the VIS participants, maximum and minimum values for all parameters (LFTs, inflammatory, lactate dehydrogenase [LDH], and parasitemia) were identified from inoculation to drug treatment and from inoculation to the EOS. Correlations between continuous variables were assessed by Pearson’s correlation of log10-transformed data. Logistic regression analysis was used to test for associations between explanatory parameters and peak ALT ≥ 2.5 × ULN. A fixed cohort effect was added to the regression models to account for inherent differences between cohorts. The Mann–Whitney test was used to assess for difference in ALT values between the two drug treatments.
A backward stepwise regression was used to create two multivariable logistic models for predictors of developing a peak ALT ≥ 2.5 × ULN. Any variable that was significant (P < 0.05) in the univariate logistic regression was included in the backward stepwise regression. In the first multivariable model, the parasite clearance rate was forcibly retained into the final model; in the second multivariable model, the PCB was included. For the Thailand and Malaysia datasets, continuous measures were described using mean (95% CI), and paired t-tests on the log10 scale of the measure were used to test the differences in LFT results between day 0 (pre-treatment for Thailand artefenomel) and day 7.
Review of subject-level data.
The corresponding author reviewed the source documents of all 32 subjects involved in the P. vivax IBSM studies to exclude an alternative diagnosis such as alcohol consumption and to evaluate concomitant medication use such as acetaminophen.
RESULTS
Volunteer infection studies.
All eight subjects enrolled in the artefenomel study were male compared with a more even gender ratio in the chloroquine study where 13/24 (54%) of subjects were males. There was no difference in the age of subjects recruited in the artefenomel and chloroquine studies (median [IQR] 23.5 [22–25.8] years and 24.5 [20–30] years, respectively).
Liver function test abnormalities.
Following antimalarial treatment, an ALT ≥ 2.5 × ULN occurred in 11/32 (34%) subjects. Alanine transaminase elevations generally exceeded AST (correlation peak ALT to peak AST R = 0.99; P < 0.001). Levels typically began to increase 3 days after treatment, peaking between days 5 and 8 after treatment and resolving between day 11 and day 32 after treatment (Figure 1). The highest ALT observed was 632 IU/L (15.8 × ULN), occurring 6 days post-treatment. All subjects remained clinically well. There was no relationship between age or gender and LFT elevations. No volunteer had significant elevations in alkaline phosphatase or bilirubin, and Hy’s law was not invoked. Gamma glutamyl transferase was measured in the artefenomel-treated subjects only; all results were within the normal range. Creatine kinase was measured in three artefenomel-treated subjects and one chloroquine-treated subject at or within 3 days of the peak ALT; all were within normal range. Mild elevations in LDH of up to 1.6 × ULN were observed in 19/32 subjects. Elevations in CRP levels were common and typically peaked at 2–3 days post-treatment. Peak ALT occurred before recrudescence of parasitemia in subjects treated with artefenomel.
Course of ALT over time in Plasmodium vivax–induced blood-stage malaria. Changes in ALT levels over time for all 32 subjects. Each of the 32 subjects are represented by a single trace. Day 0 represents the day of inoculation (arrow). Those subjects represented by dotted lines were from chloroquine cohort C1 (n = 8), and all were treated 8 days post-inoculation. The dashed line represents subject C13 (R013) from chloroquine cohort C2 who was the only subject treated on day 9 post–inoculation. The ULN for ALT in male subjects (40 IU/L) has been included for reference (dashed horizontal line). ALT = alanine transaminase; ULN = upper limit of normal.
Citation: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 103, 5; 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0491
Course of ALT over time in Plasmodium vivax–induced blood-stage malaria. Changes in ALT levels over time for all 32 subjects. Each of the 32 subjects are represented by a single trace. Day 0 represents the day of inoculation (arrow). Those subjects represented by dotted lines were from chloroquine cohort C1 (n = 8), and all were treated 8 days post-inoculation. The dashed line represents subject C13 (R013) from chloroquine cohort C2 who was the only subject treated on day 9 post–inoculation. The ULN for ALT in male subjects (40 IU/L) has been included for reference (dashed horizontal line). ALT = alanine transaminase; ULN = upper limit of normal.
Citation: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 103, 5; 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0491
Course of ALT over time in Plasmodium vivax–induced blood-stage malaria. Changes in ALT levels over time for all 32 subjects. Each of the 32 subjects are represented by a single trace. Day 0 represents the day of inoculation (arrow). Those subjects represented by dotted lines were from chloroquine cohort C1 (n = 8), and all were treated 8 days post-inoculation. The dashed line represents subject C13 (R013) from chloroquine cohort C2 who was the only subject treated on day 9 post–inoculation. The ULN for ALT in male subjects (40 IU/L) has been included for reference (dashed horizontal line). ALT = alanine transaminase; ULN = upper limit of normal.
Citation: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 103, 5; 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0491
The peak ALT was greater among the eight subjects administered with artefenomel (median 5.3 [IQR: 2.2–9.1] × ULN) than that among the 24 subjects who were given chloroquine (1.0 [IQR: 0.8–2.5] × ULN; P = 0.002) (Figure 2). Likewise, a greater proportion of subjects in the artefenomel group had a peak ALT of ≥ 2.5 × ULN (5/8 [63%] versus 6/24 [25%]; odds ratio [OR] 5.0; 95% CI: 0.91–27.47; P = 0.064).
Peak ALT × ULN for each induced blood-stage malaria subject per treatment. Peak ALT × ULN with median and interquartile range for subjects treated with artefenomel (n = 8) and chloroquine (n = 24). Subjects treated with chloroquine came from three cohorts (cohort 1, n = 8; cohort 2, n = 8; cohort 3, n = 8). ALT = alanine transaminase; ULN = upper limit of normal.
Citation: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 103, 5; 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0491
Peak ALT × ULN for each induced blood-stage malaria subject per treatment. Peak ALT × ULN with median and interquartile range for subjects treated with artefenomel (n = 8) and chloroquine (n = 24). Subjects treated with chloroquine came from three cohorts (cohort 1, n = 8; cohort 2, n = 8; cohort 3, n = 8). ALT = alanine transaminase; ULN = upper limit of normal.
Citation: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 103, 5; 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0491
Peak ALT × ULN for each induced blood-stage malaria subject per treatment. Peak ALT × ULN with median and interquartile range for subjects treated with artefenomel (n = 8) and chloroquine (n = 24). Subjects treated with chloroquine came from three cohorts (cohort 1, n = 8; cohort 2, n = 8; cohort 3, n = 8). ALT = alanine transaminase; ULN = upper limit of normal.
Citation: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 103, 5; 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0491
Parasite measures.
Peak parasitemia was associated with peak ALT (R = 0.39; P = 0.027), with a nonsignificant trend also observed between peak parasitemia and risk of developing ALT ≥ 2.5 × ULN (OR 3.72; 95% CI: 0.77–18.03; P = 0.10; Table 3). No relationship between PCt1/2 and ALT elevations was observed (Table 3).
Association of explanatory parameters with elevated peak ALT in induced blood-stage malaria
| Explanatory parameter | Peak ALT | Logistic regression | Logistic regression with fixed cohort effect | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 2.5 × ULN (n = 21) | ≥ 2.5 × ULN (n = 11) | OR (95% CI) | P-value | OR (95% CI) | P-value | |
| Median parasite clearance half-life (hours), (IQR) | 4.70 (4.12–5.69) | 4.36 (3.16–5.40) | 0.69 (0.34–1.39) | 0.30 | 1.06 (0.43–2.60) | 0.90 |
| Median peak parasitemia (parasites/mL), (IQR) | 45,156 (12,922–78,227) | 96,020 (52,370–201,433) | 3.72 (0.77–18.03) | 0.10 | 1.78 (0.17–18.72) | 0.63 |
| Median parasite clearance burden (IQR) | 0.96 (0.71–1.41) | 2.06 (1.15–2.32) | 4.28 (1.26–14.59) | 0.020 | 4.04 (0.38–49.84) | 0.25 |
| Median maximum temperature (°C), (IQR) | 38.4 (37.3–39.1) | 38.7 (38.4–39.3) | 1.92 (0.78–4.69) | 0.15 | 2.28 (0.65–7.97) | 0.20 |
| Median maximum clinical score (IQR) | 4 (2–6) | 6 (4–11) | 1.19 (0.98–1.45) | 0.085 | 1.09 (0.87–1.37) | 0.45 |
| Median maximum C-reactive protein × ULN (to EOS), (IQR) | 5.4 (2.6–9.2) | 12.0 (7.2–14.2) | 1.43 (1.10–1.86) | 0.008 | 1.45 (1.05–2.01) | 0.025 |
| Median lactate dehydrogenase × ULN (to EOS), (IQR) | 0.96 (0.86–1.08) | 1.25 (1.05–1.36) | 1.56 (1.08–2.24) | 0.017 | 1.43 (0.94–2.16) | 0.093 |
ALT = alanine transaminase; EOS = end of study; IQR = interquartile range; OR = odds ratio; ULN = upper limit of normal. Odds ratio refer to a 1-unit change in the measure of the explanatory parameter (e.g., 1°C for maximum temperature). Statistically significant P-values < 0.05 are highlighted in bold.
The PCB (Table 3) was a significant risk factor for developing a peak ALT of ≥ 2.5 × ULN, with an OR of 4.28 (95% CI: 1.26–14.59; P = 0.020) for a one log10 increase in PCB. A significant correlation between log10 peak ALT and log10 PCB (R = 0.48; P = 0.005; Supplemental Figure 1) was also observed. In keeping with its more rapid antimalarial effect, the PCB was higher in the artefenomel-treated subjects than that in chloroquine-treated subjects (median 2.18 [IQR: 2.13–2.37] versus 0.95 [IQR: 0.71–1.22]; P < 0.001; Table 2).
Summary of parasitemia-related outcomes in induced blood-stage malaria studies
| Drug | Cohort | Median peak parasitemia (parasites/mL), (IQR) | Median parasite clearance half-life (hours), (IQR) | Median PCB* (IQR) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artefenomel | n = 8 | 135,103 (69,107–189,959) | 3.60 (3.11–4.31) | 2.18 (2.13–2.37) |
| Chloroquine | C1 (n = 8) | 10,367 (6,399–12,621) | 5.48 (4.35–5.68) | 0.63 (0.44–0.83) |
| Chloroquine | C2 (n = 8) | 65,109 (25,839–130,410) | 4.73 (4.23–5.42) | 1.16 (0.83–1.39) |
| Chloroquine | C3 (n = 8) | 74,243 (50,089–117,483) | 5.59 (4.30–6.09) | 1.18 (0.95–1.33) |
| Chloroquine overall | n = 24 | 41,766 (11,923–78,842) | 5.28 (4.33–5.73) | 0.95 (0.71–1.22) |
| Total | n = 32 | 57,554 (13,112–117,483) | 4.40 (3.86–5.68) | 1.16 (0.75–2.09) |
IQR = interquartile range; PCB = parasite clearance burden.
Parasite clearance burden was calculated by subtracting the parasitemia at 24 hours post-treatment initiation from the peak parasitemia on the log10 scale and is reported as a log-fold change.
Markers of inflammation and other laboratory parameters.
There was an association between CRP and the likelihood of ALT elevation: with each increase in the maximum CRP by 4 mg/L (ULN = 4 mg/L), the likelihood of a subject developing peak ALT ≥ 2 × ULN increased by 1.43-fold (95% CI: 1.10–1.86); P = 0.008, Table 3. Likewise, the peak CRP (× ULN) was associated with peak ALT (R = 0.44; P = 0.012; Supplemental Table 8).
Multivariable analysis.
On multivariable analysis, peak CRP remained a significant risk factor for developing an ALT ≥ 2.5 × ULN after controlling for the PCB but not after controlling for the cohort effect. After controlling for the PCB, artefenomel drug treatment no longer predicted the development of peak ALT ≥ 2.5 × ULN (OR 5.0 [95% CI: 0.91–27.47; P = 0.064] to 0.84 [95% CI: 0.05–15.19; P = 0.91]). No other pre-treatment laboratory parameter predicted the development of an ALT ≥ 2.5 × ULN after controlling for the cohort effect (Supplemental Table 1).
Treatment outcomes.
There was no association between maximum drug concentration (Cmax), time to maximum drug concentration (Tmax), or area under the parasitemia curve at 96 hours post-treatment, for artefenomel or chloroquine, and the timing or severity of ALT elevations.
Acetaminophen use and alternative medical diagnoses.
In the chloroquine study, the median peak ALT did not differ between cohort 2 (1.63 × ULN [IQR: 0.82–3.46]), where ibuprofen was administered for symptom relief, and cohort 3 (1.39 × ULN [IQR: 1.05–2.5]), where acetaminophen was the preferred treatment (Supplemental Figure 2). Review of the source documents did not reveal any alternative causes (including exercise) for the observed LFT abnormalities.
Phase IIA study of artefenomel in Thailand.
The median (IQR; range) age of the 41 participants was 26 (21–30; 18–60) years, and 32 (78%) were male. The mean (range) parasite count for P. vivax–infected patients was 15,905/μL (5,010–53,400).25
The median ALT increased from 21 IU/L pre-treatment to 30 IU/L at day 7 (P < 0.001). One patient had an ALT elevation of ≥ 2.5 × ULN, with a maximum absolute increase of 156 U/L (20 U/L on day 0, 176 U/L on day 7, and improving to 50 U/L on day 15). This patient was treated with a 200 mg dose of artefenomel, the lowest dose used in the study (Figure 3).
Phase IIA artefenomel study: course of ALT levels. Changes in ALT levels (U/L) over time for all 41 subjects. Day 1 represents the day 0 pre-treatment value and day 0 represents the first ALT value post-treatment. Data are displayed in this way to ease the graphical representation of the data. For ease of interpretation subjects, 2–19 and 1–22 are represented by dotted and dashed lines, respectively. The ULN for ALT in male and female subjects (40 IU/L) from the assay used in the study has been included for reference. ALT = alanine transaminase; ULN = upper limit of normal.
Citation: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 103, 5; 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0491
Phase IIA artefenomel study: course of ALT levels. Changes in ALT levels (U/L) over time for all 41 subjects. Day 1 represents the day 0 pre-treatment value and day 0 represents the first ALT value post-treatment. Data are displayed in this way to ease the graphical representation of the data. For ease of interpretation subjects, 2–19 and 1–22 are represented by dotted and dashed lines, respectively. The ULN for ALT in male and female subjects (40 IU/L) from the assay used in the study has been included for reference. ALT = alanine transaminase; ULN = upper limit of normal.
Citation: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 103, 5; 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0491
Phase IIA artefenomel study: course of ALT levels. Changes in ALT levels (U/L) over time for all 41 subjects. Day 1 represents the day 0 pre-treatment value and day 0 represents the first ALT value post-treatment. Data are displayed in this way to ease the graphical representation of the data. For ease of interpretation subjects, 2–19 and 1–22 are represented by dotted and dashed lines, respectively. The ULN for ALT in male and female subjects (40 IU/L) from the assay used in the study has been included for reference. ALT = alanine transaminase; ULN = upper limit of normal.
Citation: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 103, 5; 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0491
Sabah Malaysia.
Eighty-five patients had day 0 and day 7 ALT measures available and were included in the analysis. The median (IQR; range) age was 16 (11–64; 3–65) years, and 63 (74%) were male. The median (IQR) parasite count at day 0 was 4,048/μL (1,523–8,120).
Forty-four (51.8%) of the 85 subjects were treated with artesunate/mefloquine, 32 (37.7%) with chloroquine, 7 (8.2%) with artemether/lumefantrine and primaquine, and 2 (2.4%) with chloroquine and primaquine. Among those treated with chloroquine, the median ALT decreased from 14 (IQR: 7–29) at day 0 to 7.5 (IQR: 5–11) at day 7 (P < 0.001), whereas in those treated with artemether/lumefantrine, the median ALT decreased from 17 (IQR: 11–35) at day 0 to 10 (IQR: 7–13) at day 7 (P < 0.001). No patient developed an ALT ≥ 2.5 × ULN (Figure 4).
Malaysia studies: course of ALT levels. Day 0 (pre-treatment) and day 7 ALT results for all subjects segregated into those who had an increase in ALT and those who did not. ALT= alanine transaminase.
Citation: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 103, 5; 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0491
Malaysia studies: course of ALT levels. Day 0 (pre-treatment) and day 7 ALT results for all subjects segregated into those who had an increase in ALT and those who did not. ALT= alanine transaminase.
Citation: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 103, 5; 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0491
Malaysia studies: course of ALT levels. Day 0 (pre-treatment) and day 7 ALT results for all subjects segregated into those who had an increase in ALT and those who did not. ALT= alanine transaminase.
Citation: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 103, 5; 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0491
DISCUSSION
Asymptomatic transaminase elevations ≥ 2.5 × ULN without concomitant increases in bilirubin occurred in 11/32 (34%) subjects in the two P. vivax IBSM studies. Abnormalities generally began 3 days post-treatment, peaking 5–8 days post-treatment, with resolution before the EOS. Peak ALT was typically greater than peak AST. We were unable to identify a single factor that accounted for all the observed transaminase elevations in the P. vivax IBSM studies. Moreover, we did not identify any pre-treatment parameter that predicted subsequent development of transaminase elevations. However, we observed statistically significant associations between transaminase elevations and PCB and CRP.
Transaminase elevations mirroring those seen in the P. vivax IBSM studies were rare in the clinical P. vivax studies, occurring in only 1/41 (2.4%) Thai patients treated with artefenomel and in none of the 76 Malaysian patients treated with chloroquine or artemisinin combination therapy. Consistent with these findings, in a previous phase II study of artefenomel (800 mg) in combination with piperaquine (640 mg, 960 mg, or 1,440 mg) for treatment of P. falciparum malaria, only 1/448 (0.2%) subjects experienced a grade 3 (5.1–10 × ULN) transaminase elevation.26 Transaminase elevations were also not observed in a phase I study of artefenomel in 26 healthy volunteers without malaria.23
In the VISs, although the risk of developing elevations of ALT ≥ 2.5 × ULN was higher among subjects treated with artefenomel than that among those treated with chloroquine, this association disappeared when corrected for other factors, notably the PCB (Supplemental Table 7). Of significance, artefenomel has a more rapid parasiticidal effect than chloroquine.25,26,31
The PCB is a composite of the rate of parasite clearance (i.e., PCt1/2) and peak parasitemia around the time of treatment, and thus, it represents the biomass of parasites cleared immediately post-treatment. As such, it distinguishes between artefenomel (a fast-killing drug) and chloroquine (a drug with a slower effect on parasite clearance), while still accounting for the overall reduction in parasite biomass post–antimalarial treatment (Table 2). Peak parasitemia has previously been identified as a risk factor for LFT abnormalities in malaria VISs,39 but in our analysis, it had a weaker relationship with peak ALT than PCB.
We have previously reported post-treatment transaminase elevations of > 5 × ULN in 4/6 (66%) subjects in a P. vivax IBSM study where a different parasite isolate from a different donor was used. In that study, treatment was also with the fast-acting drug artemether/lumefantrine,2 and the high proportion of subjects with LFT abnormalities, in the context of rapid parasite clearance and likely high PCB, is consistent with findings reported here. LFT abnormalities similar to those described in the P. vivax IBSM studies have been observed in IBSM studies with P. falciparum 3D716 as well as in P. falciparum studies where infection was induced by sporozoites.7,15 Therefore, the observed LFT abnormalities are unlikely to be due to a specific effect from the species or strain used during these studies nor the route of infection.
In clinical trials of antimalarials, clinically significant transaminase elevations occurring after treatment have not been commonly reported. Assessments of liver function during the day 5–8 window where ALT changes were observed in the IBSM studies may not have been universally undertaken.24,40–46 However, even when testing has occurred 5–8 days post-treatment, transaminase elevations mirroring those observed in P. vivax IBSM studies appear to be uncommon in P. falciparum–infected patients treated with artemisinin combination therapies (0.2–7.8%).19,47–53 For example, in a recent randomized clinical trial in West Africa where four different artemisinin combination therapies were evaluated in 4,710 patients experiencing 8,640 malaria episodes (7,119 P. falciparum, 146 P. malariae, 31 Plasmodium ovale, and 17 mixed infections), the LFT was undertaken on days 0 (pre-dose), 3, 7, and 28. In this study, LFT changes resembling those we report here were rare, being reported after treatment with any of the four drug combinations in 0.9–3.9% of the 8,640 treatment encounters, and were more commonly seen in children < 5 years of age.19 All patients were treated with artemisinin-based regimens characterized by rapid parasite clearance, and thus more likely to have a high PCB.
One possible explanation for the lower frequency of post-treatment increases in ALT in malaria-endemic settings is that there may be a reduced susceptibility to hepatic injury due to previous exposure to malaria,54 with resulting modulation of the host immune response.55 This may also explain why ALT increases post-treatment occur more often in returned travelers,5,47 in whom most malaria episodes will be a primary infection. Alternatively, it is also possible that genetic polymorphisms or other host characteristics such as iron deficiency could influence susceptibility to transaminase elevations following malaria treatment.56,57
Higher maximum CRP was associated with an increased risk of a peak ALT of ≥ 2.5 × ULN, suggesting that systemic inflammation likely contributes to the development of post-treatment LFT abnormalities in VISs, as previously postulated.39 Rodent malaria studies have suggested that TNF-α generated during malaria infection and free heme, produced following rapid hemolysis, act together to induce hepatocyte apoptosis and transaminase leakage.58–61 Testing for additional markers of hemolysis, free heme, and TNFα would also be worth undertaking in future studies. In addition to the effects of systemic inflammation and hemolysis, it is possible, though speculative, that liver injury in primary infections may also result from killing of P. vivax parasites potentially sequestered in the liver, as now recognized to occur in the spleen,62 possibly exacerbating localized hepatic inflammation.
The relatively small number of subjects in this study limits statistical power, and a larger dataset would be required for a more robust multivariable analysis. Differences between cohorts meant comparisons across cohorts was difficult and could confound the analysis. In the case of PCB, it is strongly affected by both the day of treatment and the antimalarial used. In addition, as it is calculated solely from two data points, the measure may be susceptible to bias and should be prospectively evaluated in future studies.
Post-treatment LFT changes appear to be more common in P. vivax IBSM than natural infection. Although treating physicians should remain vigilant, these changes have to date been asymptomatic, self-limiting, and not associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Researchers and pharmaceutical companies should become familiar with these findings so that the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon can be better understood and alternate explanations of the causation of LFT changes can be considered in the development of antimalarials. LFT on days 3, 5, and 7 post-treatment initiation should be incorporated, where possible, into the study design of antimalarial clinical trials.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Peter O’Rourke for assistance with the statistical analysis plan, Rebecca Watts for assistance with ethical approval for sample testing, and Farouk Chughlay and Laura Cascales for assistance with manuscript preparation.
REFERENCES
- 1.↑
Chughlay MF et al. 2020. Liver enzyme elevations in Plasmodium falciparum volunteer infection studies: findings and recommendations. Am J Trop Med Hyg 103: 378–393.
- 2.↑
Griffin P et al. 2016. Safety and reproducibility of a clinical trial system using induced blood stage Plasmodium vivax infection and its potential as a model to evaluate malaria transmission. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 10: e0005139.
- 3.↑
Verhage DF, Telgt DS, Bousema JT, Hermsen CC, van Gemert GJ, van der Meer JW, Sauerwein RW, 2005. Clinical outcome of experimental human malaria induced by Plasmodium falciparum-infected mosquitoes. Neth J Med 63: 52–58.
- 4.↑
Richie TL et al. 2015. Progress with Plasmodium falciparum sporozoite (PfSPZ)-based malaria vaccines. Vaccine 33: 7452–7461.
- 5.↑
Woodford J et al. 2019. An experimental human blood stage model for studying Plasmodium malariae infection. J Infect Dis 221: 948–955.
- 6.↑
Tran TM et al. 2016. Transcriptomic evidence for modulation of host inflammatory responses during febrile Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Sci Rep 6: 31291.
- 7.↑
Chughlay MF et al. 2020. Liver enzyme elevations in Plasmodium falciparum volunteer infection studies: findings and recommendations. Am J Trop Med Hyg 103: 378–393.
- 8.↑
Valencia SH, Rodriguez DC, Acero DL, Ocampo V, Arevalo-Herrera M, 2011. Platform for Plasmodium vivax vaccine discovery and development. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 106 (Suppl 1): 179–192.
- 9.↑
Food and Drug Administration, 2009. Guidance for Industry Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Premarketing Clinical Evaluation. Rockville, MD.
- 10.↑
Anand AC, Ramji C, Narula AS, Singh W, 1992. Malarial hepatitis: a heterogeneous syndrome? Natl Med J India 5: 59–62.
- 11.
Jain A, Kaushik R, Kaushik RM, 2016. Malarial hepatopathy: clinical profile and association with other malarial complications. Acta Trop 159: 95–105.
- 12.
Anand AC, Puri P, 2005. Jaundice in malaria. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 20: 1322–1332.
- 13.
Kochar DK, Kaswan K, Kochar SK, Sirohi P, Pal M, Kochar A, Agrawal RP, Das A, 2006. A comparative study of regression of jaundice in patients of malaria and acute viral hepatitis. J Vector Borne Dis 43: 123–129.
- 14.↑
Fazil A, Vernekar PV, Geriani D, Pant S, Senthilkumaran S, Anwar N, Prabhu A, Menezes RG, 2013. Clinical profile and complication of malaria hepatopathy. J Infect Public Health 6: 383–388.
- 15.↑
Reuling IJ et al. 2018. Liver injury in uncomplicated malaria is an overlooked phenomenon: an observational study. EBioMedicine 36: 131–139.
- 16.↑
McCarthy JS et al. 2016. A phase II pilot trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of ferroquine against early Plasmodium falciparum in an induced blood-stage malaria infection study. Malar J 15: 469.
- 17.↑
Jimenez-Diaz MB et al. 2014. (+)-SJ733, a clinical candidate for malaria that acts through ATP4 to induce rapid host-mediated clearance of Plasmodium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111: E5455–E5462.
- 18.↑
Woodford JSG, Griffin P, Chalon S, McCarthy JS, 2018. The dynamics of liver function test abnormalities after malaria infection: a retrospective observational study. Am J Trop Med Hyg 98: 1113–1119.
- 19.↑
West African Network for Clinical Trials of Antimalarial Drugs, 2018. Pyronaridine-artesunate or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus current first-line therapies for repeated treatment of uncomplicated malaria: a randomised, multicentre, open-label, longitudinal, controlled, phase 3b/4 trial. Lancet 391: 1378–1390.
- 20.↑
Lobel HO, Miani M, Eng T, Bernard KW, Hightower AW, Campbell CC, 1993. Long-term malaria prophylaxis with weekly mefloquine. Lancet 341: 848–851.
- 21.
Boudreau E, Schuster B, Sanchez J, Novakowski W, Johnson R, Redmond D, Hanson R, Dausel L, 1993. Tolerability of prophylactic Lariam regimens. Trop Med Parasitol 44: 257–265.
- 22.
Barrett PJ, Emmins PD, Clarke PD, Bradley DJ, 1996. Comparison of adverse events associated with use of mefloquine and combination of chloroquine and proguanil as antimalarial prophylaxis: postal and telephone survey of travellers. BMJ 313: 525–528.
- 23.↑
Moehrle JJ, Duparc S, Siethoff C, van Giersbergen PL, Craft JC, Arbe-Barnes S, Charman SA, Gutierrez M, Wittlin S, Vennerstrom JL, 2013. First-in-man safety and pharmacokinetics of synthetic ozonide OZ439 demonstrates an improved exposure profile relative to other peroxide antimalarials. Br J Clin Pharmacol 75: 524–537.
- 24.↑
Sowunmi A, Fehintola FA, Adedeji AA, Gbotosho GO, Tambo E, Fateye BA, Happi TC, Oduola AM, 2005. Open randomized study of artesunate-amodiaquine vs. chloroquine-pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Nigerian children. Trop Med Int Health 10: 1161–1170.
- 25.↑
Phyo AP, Jittamala P, Nosten FH, Pukrittayakamee S, Imwong M, White NJ, Duparc S, Macintyre F, Baker M, Mohrle JJ, 2016. Antimalarial activity of artefenomel (OZ439), a novel synthetic antimalarial endoperoxide, in patients with Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria: an open-label phase 2 trial. Lancet Infect Dis 16: 61–69.
- 26.↑
Macintyre F et al. 2017. A randomised, double-blind clinical phase II trial of the efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a single dose combination treatment with artefenomel and piperaquine in adults and children with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. BMC Med 15: 181.
- 27.↑
Grigg MJ et al. 2016. Efficacy of artesunate-mefloquine for chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium vivax malaria in Malaysia: an open-label, randomized, controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis 62: 1403–1411.
- 28.↑
Grigg MJ et al. 2018. Age-related clinical spectrum of Plasmodium knowlesi malaria and predictors of severity. Clin Infect Dis 67: 350–359.
- 29.↑
Collins KA et al. 2020. A Plasmodium vivax experimental human infection model for evaluating the efficacy of interventions. J Clin Invest 130: 2920–2927.
- 30.↑
Collins KA, Abd-Rahman AN, Marquart L, Ballard E, Gobeau N, Griffin P, Chalon S, Mohrle JJ, McCarthy JS, 2020. Antimalarial activity of artefenomel against asexual parasites and transmissible gametocytes during experimental blood-stage Plasmodium vivax infection. J Infect Dis 2020 Jun 1;jiaa287 (Epub ahead of print). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaa287.
- 31.↑
McCarthy JS, Baker M, O’Rourke P, Marquart L, Griffin P, Hooft van Huijsduijnen R, Mohrle JJ, 2016. Efficacy of OZ439 (artefenomel) against early Plasmodium falciparum blood-stage malaria infection in healthy volunteers. J Antimicrob Chemother 71: 2620–2627.
- 32.↑
Rockett RJ, Tozer SJ, Peatey C, Bialasiewicz S, Whiley DM, Nissen MD, Trenholme K, Mc Carthy JS, Sloots TP, 2011. A real-time, quantitative PCR method using hydrolysis probes for the monitoring of Plasmodium falciparum load in experimentally infected human volunteers. Malar J 10: 48.
- 33.↑
Marquart L, Baker M, O'Rourke P, McCarthy JS, 2015. Evaluating the pharmacodynamic effect of antimalarial drugs in clinical trials by quantitative PCR. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59: 4249–4259.
- 34.↑
Collins KA, Rückle T, Elliott S, Marquart L, Ballard E, Chalon S, Griffin P, Möhrle JJ, McCarthy JS, 2019. DSM265 at 400 milligrams clears asexual stage parasites but not mature gametocytes from the blood of healthy subjects experimentally infected with Plasmodium falciparum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63: e01837–18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01837-18.
- 35.↑
Wroblewski F, 1958. The clinical significance of alterations in transaminase activities of serum and other body fluids. Adv Clin Chem 1: 313–351.
- 36.↑
WHO, 1979. WHO Handbook for Reporting Results of Cancer Treatment. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
- 39.↑
Reuling IJ et al. 2018. Liver injury in uncomplicated malaria is an overlooked phenomenon: an observational study. EBioMedicine 36: 131–139.
- 40.↑
Ashraf M, Fahad S, 2014. A study correlating the derangement of liver function tests in vivax and falciparum malaria. J Dent Med Sci 13: 81–84.
- 41.
Schramm B et al. 2013. Tolerability and safety of artesunate-amodiaquine and artemether-lumefantrine fixed dose combinations for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria: two open-label, randomized trials in Nimba County, Liberia. Malar J 12: 250.
- 42.
Zwang J, Dorsey G, Djimde A, Karema C, Martensson A, Ndiaye JL, Sirima SB, Olliaro P, 2012. Clinical tolerability of artesunate-amodiaquine versus comparator treatments for uncomplicated falciparum malaria: an individual-patient analysis of eight randomized controlled trials in sub-Saharan Africa. Malar J 11: 260.
- 43.
Gasasira AF et al. 2008. High risk of neutropenia in HIV-infected children following treatment with artesunate plus amodiaquine for uncomplicated malaria in Uganda. Clin Infect Dis 46: 985–991.
- 44.
Maiteki-Sebuguzi C et al. 2008. Safety and tolerability of combination antimalarial therapies for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Ugandan children. Malar J 7: 106.
- 45.
Win K, Than M, Thwe Y, 1992. Comparison of combinations of parenteral artemisinin derivatives plus oral mefloquine with intravenous quinine plus oral tetracycline for treating cerebral malaria. Bull World Health Organ 70: 777–782.
- 46.↑
Newton PN, Angus BJ, Chierakul W, Dondorp A, Ruangveerayuth R, Silamut K, Teerapong P, Suputtamongkol Y, Looareesuwan S, White NJ, 2003. Randomized comparison of artesunate and quinine in the treatment of severe falciparum malaria. Clin Infect Dis 37: 7–16.
- 47.↑
Silva-Pinto A, Ruas R, Almeida F, Duro R, Silva A, Abreu C, Sarmento A, 2017. Artemether-lumefantrine and liver enzyme abnormalities in non-severe Plasmodium falciparum malaria in returned travellers: a retrospective comparative study with quinine-doxycycline in a Portuguese centre. Malar J 16: 43.
- 48.
Brasseur P, Vaillant MT, Olliaro PL, 2012. Anti-malarial drug safety information obtained through routine monitoring in a rural district of south-western Senegal. Malar J 11: 402.
- 49.
Tshefu AK et al. 2010. Efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose oral combination of pyronaridine-artesunate compared with artemether-lumefantrine in children and adults with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 375: 1457–1467.
- 50.
Ribeiro IR, Olliaro P, 1998. Safety of artemisinin and its derivatives. A review of published and unpublished clinical trials. Med Trop (Mars) 58: 50–53.
- 51.
Yeka A, Lameyre V, Afizi K, Fredrick M, Lukwago R, Kamya MR, Talisuna AO, 2014. Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose artesunate-amodiaquine vs. artemether-lumefantrine for repeated treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Ugandan children. PLoS One 9: e113311.
- 52.
Duparc S, Borghini-Fuhrer I, Craft CJ, Arbe-Barnes S, Miller RM, Shin CS, Fleckenstein L, 2013. Safety and efficacy of pyronaridine-artesunate in uncomplicated acute malaria: an integrated analysis of individual patient data from six randomized clinical trials. Malar J 12: 70.
- 53.↑
Bui Quang P et al. 2019. Pyronaridine-artesunate efficacy and safety in uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in areas of artemisinin-resistant falciparum in Viet Nam (2017–2018). Clin Infect Dis 70: 2187–2195.
- 54.↑
Doolan DL, Dobano C, Baird JK, 2009. Acquired immunity to malaria. Clin Microbiol Rev 22: 13–36.
- 55.↑
Engwerda CR, Good MF, 2005. Interactions between malaria parasites and the host immune system. Curr Opin Immunol 17: 381–387.
- 56.↑
Chiabrando D, Vinchi F, Fiorito V, Mercurio S, Tolosano E, 2014. Heme in pathophysiology: a matter of scavenging, metabolism and trafficking across cell membranes. Front Pharmacol 5: 61.
- 57.↑
Mendonca VR, Luz NF, Santos NJ, Borges VM, Goncalves MS, Andrade BB, Barral-Netto M, 2012. Association between the haptoglobin and heme oxygenase 1 genetic profiles and soluble CD163 in susceptibility to and severity of human malaria. Infect Immun 80: 1445–1454.
- 58.↑
Guha M, Kumar S, Choubey V, Maity P, Bandyopadhyay U, 2006. Apoptosis in liver during malaria: role of oxidative stress and implication of mitochondrial pathway. FASEB J 20: 1224–1226.
- 59.
Dey S, Mazumder S, Siddiqui AA, Iqbal MS, Banerjee C, Sarkar S, De R, Goyal M, Bindu S, Bandyopadhyay U, 2014. Association of heme oxygenase 1 with the restoration of liver function after damage in murine malaria by Plasmodium yoelii. Infect Immun 82: 3113–3126.
- 60.
Oliveira-Lima OC, Bernardes D, Xavier Pinto MC, Esteves Arantes RM, Carvalho-Tavares J, 2013. Mice lacking inducible nitric oxide synthase develop exacerbated hepatic inflammatory responses induced by Plasmodium berghei NK65 infection. Microbes Infect 15: 903–910.
- 61.↑
Seixas E, Oliveira P, Moura Nunes JF, Coutinho A, 2008. An experimental model for fatal malaria due to TNF-alpha-dependent hepatic damage. Parasitology 135: 683–690.
- 62.↑
Kho S, 2019. A Hidden Biomass of Non-Phagocytosed Asexual and Sexual Stages of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum in the Human Spleen. 7th International Conference on Plasmodium vivax Research (ICPvR), Paris, France.