1921
Volume 98, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645

Abstract

Abstract.

Community-led total sanitation (CLTS) is a common method for promoting sanitation in low-income settings. This cluster-randomized trial evaluated an intervention to improve inclusion of people with disability in CLTS through training facilitators. A qualitative study examined intervention acceptability. The trial included 171 people with disabilities (78 control and 93 intervention) living in 15 intervention and 15 control communities. In the intervention arm, respondents were more likely to participate in a community meeting about sanitation (+18.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.2, 34.2) and to have been visited to discuss sanitation (+19.7, 95% CI: 0.6, 37.8). More intervention households improved latrine access for the disabled member (+9%, CI: −3.1, 21.0). Inclusive CLTS could improve sanitation access for people with disability but requires support to households beyond that provided in this trial.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.17-0435
2018-02-05
2019-09-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/14761645/98/4/tpmd170435.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.17-0435&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. World Health Organization, 2011. World Bank. World Report on Disability. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
  2. Banks L, Polack S, , 2013. The Economic Costs of Exclusion and Gains of Inclusion of People with Disabilities: Evidence from Low and Middle Income Countries. London, United Kingdom: CBM.
  3. Groce N, Bailey N, Lang R, Trani JF, Kett M, , 2011. Water and sanitation issues for persons with disabilities in low- and middle-income countries: a literature review and discussion of implications for global health and international development. J Water Health 9: 617627. [Google Scholar]
  4. White S, Kuper H, Itimu-Phiri A, Holm R, Biran A, , 2016. A qualitative study of barriers to accessing water, sanitation and hygiene for disabled people in Malawi. PLoS One 11: e0155043. [Google Scholar]
  5. Danquah L, , 2014. Undoing Inequity: Inclusive Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Programmes that Deliver for All in Uganda. Full Mid-Term Review Report. London, United Kingdom: WaterAid.
  6. Jones H, Wilbur J, , 2014. Compendium of Accessible WASH Technologies. London, United Kingdom: WEDC, SHARE, WaterAid.
  7. Norman WR, , 2010. Water, Sanitation and Disability in Rural West Africa: Enhancing Access and Use of WASH Facilities. Mechanicsburg, PA: Messiah College.
  8. JMP, 2014. Progress on Drinking Water and Sanitation–2014 Update: WHO and UNICEF. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
  9. Munthali A, , 2011. Situation Analysis of PWDs in Malawi. Zomba, Malawi: Center for Social Research, University of Malawi.
  10. Washington Group on Disability Statistics, 2011. Washington Group—Extended Question Set on Functioning. Luxembourg, Europe: CDC.
  11. Kar K, Chambers R, , 2008. Handbook on Community-Led Total Sanitation. London, United Kingdom: Plan International and Institute of Development Studies.
  12. The Government of Malawi, 2011. Open Defecation Free Malawi Strategy 2011–2015. Lilongwe, Malawi: Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Water Development.
  13. Wilbur J, Jones H, , 2014. Frontiers of CLTS Issue 3: Disability-making CLTS Fully Inclusive—Community-Led Total Sanitation. Brighton, United Kingdom: Institute of Development Studies.
  14. Jones H, Singini W, Holm R, White S, , 2016. CLTS Plus: Making CLTS Ever More Inclusive. 39th WEDC International Conference, July 11–15, 2016, Kumasi, Ghana.
  15. Hayes N, , 1997. Theory-led thematic analysis: social identification in small companies. Hayes N, ed. Doing Qualitative Analysis in Psychology. Hove, United Kingdom: Psychology Press.
  16. Braun V, Clarke V, , 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3: 77101. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jones H, , 2012. Designing a Pit Latrine Slab. Loughborough, United Kingdom: WEDC and WaterAid.
  18. WEDC, 2012. Accessibility Audit of Water & Sanitation Facilities. Loughborough, United Kingdom: Loughborough University.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.17-0435
Loading
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.17-0435
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Received : 05 Jun 2017
  • Accepted : 19 Nov 2017
  • Published online : 05 Feb 2018

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error