The Effects of Oral Administration of Aureomycin, Sulfathiazole, Sulfamerazine and 4,4′-Diamino Diphenyl Sulfone on Toxoplasmosis in Mice

William A. Summers
Search for other papers by William A. Summers in
Current site
Google Scholar
Restricted access


The protective properties of aureomycin hydrochloride, sulfamerazine, sodium sulfathiazole or 4,4′-diamino diphenyl sulfone have been demonstrated and compared by oral administration to mice inoculated with toxoplasma.

The sulfone provided a greater degree of protection than any of the others tested. Aureomycin and sulfathiazole afforded approximately equal protection while sulfamerazine was the least effective.

Since para-aminobenzoic acid failed to counteract the protective effect of aureomycin it appears that the mode of action of this antibiotic in preventing the death of toxoplasma-infected mice is different than that of sodium sulfathiazole or 4,4′-diamino diphenyl sulfone.

Author Notes

Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana.