ProCite
RefWorks
Reference Manager
BibTeX
Zotero
EndNote
-
1.
Hoffmann AA, Turelli M, 1997. Cytoplasmic incompatibility in insects. O’Neill S, Hoffmann A, Werren J, eds. Influential Passengers. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 42–80.
-
2.
Engelstädter J, Telschow A, 2009. Cytoplasmic incompatibility and host population structure. Heredity (Edinb) 103: 196–207.
-
3.
Kriesner P, Hoffmann AA, Lee SF, Turelli M, Weeks AR, 2013. Rapid sequential spread of two Wolbachia variants in Drosophila simulans. PLoS Pathog 9: e1003607.
-
4.
Turelli M, Hoffmann AA, 1991. Rapid spread of an inherited incompatibility factor in California Drosophila. Nature 353: 440–442.
-
5.
Turelli M, 1994. Evolution of incompatibility-inducing microbes and their hosts. Evolution 48: 1500–1513.
-
6.
Vala F, Egas M, Breeuwer JAJ, Sabelis MW, 2004. Wolbachia affects oviposition and mating behaviour of its spider mite host. J Evol Biol 17: 692–700.
-
7.
Hoffmann AA, Turelli M, Harshman LG, 1990. Factors affecting the distribution of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila simulans. Genetics 126: 933–948.
-
8.
Champion de Crespigny FE, Hurst LD, Wedell N, 2008. Do Wolbachia-associated incompatibilities promote polyandry? Evolution 62: 107–122.
-
9.
Bian GW, Xu Y, Lu P, Xie Y, Xi ZY, 2010. The endosymbiotic bacterium Wolbachia induces resistance to dengue virus in Aedes aegypti. PLoS Pathog 6: e1000833.
-
10.
van den Hurk AF, Hall-Mendelin S, Pyke AT, Frentiu FD, McElroy K, Day A, Higgs S, O’Neill SL, 2012. Impact of Wolbachia on infection with chikungunya and yellow fever viruses in the mosquito vector Aedes aegypti. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6: e1892.
-
11.
Kambris Z, Cook PE, Phuc HK, Sinkins SP, 2009. Immune activation by life-shortening Wolbachia and reduced filarial competence in mosquitoes. Science 326: 134–136.
-
12.
Moreira LA et al. 2009. A Wolbachia symbiont in Aedes aegypti limits infection with dengue, Chikungunya, and Plasmodium. Cell 139: 1268–1278.
-
13.
McMeniman CJ, Lane RV, Cass BN, Fong AWC, Sidhu M, Wang YF, O’Neill SL, 2009. Stable introduction of a life-shortening Wolbachia infection into the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Science 323: 141–144.
-
14.
Walker T et al. 2011. The wMel Wolbachia strain blocks dengue and invades caged Aedes aegypti populations. Nature 476: 450–453.
-
15.
Yeap HL et al. 2011. Dynamics of the “popcorn” Wolbachia infection in outbred Aedes aegypti informs prospects for mosquito vector control. Genetics 187: 583–595.
-
16.
Laven H, 1967. Eradication of Culex pipiens fatigans through cytoplasmic incompatibility. Nature 216: 383–384.
-
17.
Hoffmann AA et al. 2011. Successful establishment of Wolbachia in Aedes populations to suppress dengue transmission. Nature 476: 454–457.
-
18.
Ross PA, Endersby NM, Hoffmann AA, 2016. Costs of three Wolbachia infections on the survival of Aedes aegypti larvae under starvation conditions. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 10: e0004320.
-
19.
Ross PA, Wiwatanaratanabutr I, Axford JK, White VL, Endersby-Harshman NM, Hoffmann AA, 2017. Wolbachia infections in Aedes aegypti differ markedly in their response to cyclical heat stress. PLoS Pathog 13: e1006006.
-
20.
Turley AP, Zalucki MP, O’Neill SL, McGraw EA, 2013. Transinfected Wolbachia have minimal effects on male reproductive success in Aedes aegypti. Parasit Vectors 6: 36.
-
21.
Yeap HL, Axford JK, Popovici J, Endersby NM, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Ritchie SA, Hoffmann AA, 2014. Assessing quality of life-shortening Wolbachia-infected Aedes aegypti mosquitoes in the field based on capture rates and morphometric assessments. Parasit Vectors 7: 58.
-
22.
Yeap HL, Rasic G, Endersby-Harshman NM, Lee SF, Arguni E, Le Nguyen H, Hoffmann AA, 2016. Mitochondrial DNA variants help monitor the dynamics of Wolbachia invasion into host populations. Heredity (Edinb) 116: 265–276.
-
23.
Segoli M, Hoffmann AA, Lloyd J, Omodei GJ, Ritchie SA, 2014. The effect of virus-blocking Wolbachia on male competitiveness of the dengue vector mosquito, Aedes aegypti. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8: e3294.
-
24.
Axford JK, Ross PA, Yeap HL, Callahan AG, Hoffmann AA, 2016. Fitness of wAlbB Wolbachia infection in Aedes aegypti: parameter estimates in an outcrossed background and potential for population invasion. Am J Trop Med Hyg 94: 507–516.
-
25.
Craig GB Jr., 1967. Mosquitoes: female monogamy induced by male accessory gland substance. Science 156: 1499–1501.
-
26.
Fuchs MS, Craig GB Jr., Despommi DD, 1969. The protein nature of the substance inducing female monogamy in Aedes aegypti. J Insect Physiol 15: 701–709.
-
27.
Jones JC, 1973. Are mosquitos monogamous? Nature 242: 343–344.
-
28.
Spielman A, Leahy MG, Skaff V, 1967. Seminal loss in repeatedly mated female Aedes aegypti. Biol Bull 132: 404–412.
-
29.
Christophers SSR, 1960. Aedes aegypti (L.) the Yellow Fever Mosquito; Its Life History, Bionomics and Structure. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
-
30.
Roth LM, 1948. A study of mosquito behavior—an experimental laboratory study of the sexual behavior of Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus). Am Midl Nat 40: 265–352.
-
31.
Richardson JB, Jameson SB, Gloria-Soria A, Wesson DM, Powell J, 2015. Evidence of limited polyandry in a natural population of Aedes aegypti. Am J Trop Med Hyg 93: 189–193.
-
32.
Wade MJ, Chang NW, 1995. Increased male-fertility in Tribolium confusum beetles after infection with the intracellular parasite Wolbachia. Nature 373: 72–74.
-
33.
Hoffmann AA, Hercus M, Dagher H, 1998. Population dynamics of the Wolbachia infection causing cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 148: 221–231.
-
34.
De Crespigny FEC, Pitt TD, Wedell N, 2006. Increased male mating rate in Drosophila is associated with Wolbachia infection. J Evol Biol 19: 1964–1972.
-
35.
Ponlawat A, Harrington LC, 2009. Factors associated with male mating success of the dengue vector mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Am J Trop Med Hyg 80: 395–400.
-
36.
Duhrkopf RE, Hartberg WK, 1992. Differences in male mating response and female flight sounds in Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus (Diptera, Culicidae). J Med Entomol 29: 796–801.
-
37.
Cator LJ, Arthur BJ, Harrington LC, Hoy RR, 2009. Harmonic convergence in the love songs of the dengue vector mosquito. Science 323: 1077–1079.
-
38.
Cator LJ, Harrington LC, 2011. The harmonic convergence of fathers predicts the mating success of sons in Aedes aegypti. Anim Behav 82: 627–633.
-
39.
Ross PA, Endersby NM, Yeap HL, Hoffmann AA, 2014. Larval competition extends developmental time and decreases adult size of wMelPop Wolbachia-infected Aedes aegypti. Am J Trop Med Hyg 91: 198–205.
-
40.
Yeap HL, Endersby NM, Johnson PH, Ritchie SA, Hoffmann AA, 2013. Body size and wing shape measurements as quality indicators of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes destined for field release. Am J Trop Med Hyg 89: 78–92.
-
41.
Koenraadt CJ, 2008. Pupal dimensions as predictors of adult size in fitness studies of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol 45: 331–336.
-
42.
Ritchie SA, Montgomery BL, Hoffmann AA, 2013. Novel estimates of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) population size and adult survival based on Wolbachia releases. J Med Entomol 50: 624–631.
-
43.
Ritchie SA, Pyke AT, Hall-Mendelin S, Day A, Mores CN, Christofferson RC, Gubler DJ, Bennett SN, van den Hurk AF, 2013. An explosive epidemic of DENV-3 in Cairns, Australia. PLoS One 8: e68137.
-
44.
South A, Catteruccia F, 2016. Sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems in mosquitoes. Adv In Insect Phys 51: 67–92.
-
45.
Schmidt T, Filipović IA, Hoffmann A, Rašić G, 2018. Fine-scale landscape genomics helps explain the slow spatial spread of Wolbachia through the Aedes aegypti population in Cairns, Australia. Heredity 120: 386–395.
-
46.
Atkinson MP, Su Z, Alphey N, Alphey LS, Coleman PG, Wein LM, 2007. Analyzing the control of mosquito-borne diseases by a dominant lethal genetic system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 9540–9545.
-
47.
Alphey L, Benedict M, Bellini R, Clark GG, Dame DA, Service MW, Dobson SL, 2010. Sterile-insect methods for control of mosquito-borne diseases: an analysis. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 10: 295–311.
-
48.
Hendrichs J, Vreysen MJB, Enkerlin WR, Cayol JP, 2005. Strategic options in using sterile insects for area-wide integrated pest management. Dyck VA, Hendrichs J, Robinson AS, eds. Sterile Insect Technique: Principles and Practice in Area-Wide Integrated Pest Management. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands, 563–600.
-
49.
Phuc HK et al. 2007. Late-acting dominant lethal genetic systems and mosquito control. BMC Biol 5: 11.
-
50.
Fried M, 1971. Determination of sterile-insect competitiveness. J Econ Entomol 64: 869.
-
51.
Hoffmann AA, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Callahan AG, Phillips BL, Billington K, Axford JK, Montgomery B, Turley AP, O’Neill SL, 2014. Stability of the wMel Wolbachia infection following invasion into Aedes aegypti populations. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8: e3115.
-
52.
Turelli M, 2010. Cytoplasmic incompatibility in populations with overlapping generations. Evolution 64: 232–241.
-
53.
Cabrera M, Jaffe K, 2007. An aggregation pheromone modulates lekking behavior in the vector mosquito Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). J Am Mosq Control Assoc 23: 1–10.
-
54.
Oliva CF, Damiens D, Benedict MQ, 2014. Male reproductive biology of Aedes mosquitoes. Acta Trop 132 (Suppl): S12–S19.
-
55.
Schmidt TL et al. 2017. Local introduction and heterogeneous spatial spread of dengue-suppressing Wolbachia through an urban population of Aedes aegypti. PLoS Biol 15: e2001894.
-
56.
Turelli M, Barton NH, 2017. Deploying dengue-suppressing Wolbachia: Robust models predict slow but effective spatial spread in Aedes aegypti. Theor Popul Biol 115: 45–60.
.png)
The Effect of Nonrandom Mating on Wolbachia Dynamics: Implications for Population Replacement and Sterile Releases in Aedes Mosquitoes
Wolbachia bacteria are known to cause deviations from random mating and affect sperm competition (SC) in some of their arthropod hosts. Because these effects could influence the effectiveness of Wolbachia in mosquito population replacement and suppression programs, we developed a theoretical framework to investigate them and we collected relevant data for the wMel infection in Aedes aegypti. Using incompatibility patterns as a measure of mating success of infected versus uninfected mosquitoes, we found some evidence that uninfected males sire more offspring than infected males. However, our theoretical framework suggests that this effect is unlikely to hamper Wolbachia invasion and has only minor effects on population suppression programs. Nevertheless, we suggest that mating effects and SC need to be monitored in an ongoing manner in release programs, given the possibility of ongoing selection for altered mating patterns.
Author Notes
Financial support: This project was funded by a grant and a fellowship from the National Health and Medical Research Council to AAH.
Authors’ addresses: Heng Lin Yeap, Commonwealth Scientific, and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Black Mountain Laboratories, Black Mountain, Australia, E-mail: henglin.yeap@csiro.au. Nancy Margaret Endersby-Harshman and Ary Anthony Hoffmann, Pest and Environmental Adaptation Research Group, Bio21 Institute School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, E-mails: nancye@unimelb.edu.au and ary@unimelb.edu.au.