• 1

    Ali SA, Hill DR, 2003. Giardia intestinalis. Curr Opin Infect Dis 16 :453–460.

  • 2

    Rai K, Sherchand JB, Bhatta DR, Bhattarai NR, 2005. Status of Giardia intestinalis infection among the children attending Kanti children hospital, Nepal. Scientific World 3 :102–105.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Hoge CW, Echeverria P, Rajah R, Jacobs J, Malthouse S, Chapman E, Jimenez LM, Shlim DR, 1995. Prevalence of Cyclospora species and other enteric pathogens among children less than 5 years of age in Nepal. J Clin Microbiol 33 :3058–3060.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Monis PT, Andrews RH, Mayrhofer G, Ey PL, 1999. Molecular systematics of the parasitic protozoan. Giardia intestinalis. Mol Biol Evol 16 :1135–1144.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Adam RD, 2001. Biology of Giardia lamblia. Clin Microbiol Rev 14 :447–475.

  • 6

    Ajjampur SS, Sankaran P, Kannan A, Sathyakumar K, Sarkar R, Gladstone BP, Kang G, 2009. Short report: Giardia duodenalis assemblages associated with diarrhea in children in south India identified by PCR-RFLP. Am J Trop Med Hyg 80 :16–19.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Read C, Walters J, Robertson ID, Thompson RC, 2002. Correlation between genotype of Giardia duodenalis and diarrhoea. Int J Parasitol 32 :229–231.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Aydin AF, Besirbellioglu BA, Avci IY, Tanyuksel M, Araz E, Pahsa A, 2004. Classification of Giardia duodenalis parasites in Turkey into groups A and B using restriction fragment length polymorphism. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 50 :147–151.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Haque R, Roy S, Kabir M, Stroup SE, Mondal D, Houpt ER, 2005. Giardia assemblage A infection and diarrhea in Bangladesh. J Infect Dis 192 :2171–2173.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Ng CT, Gilchrist CA, Lane A, Roy S, Haque R, Houpt ER, 2005. Multiplex real-time PCR assay using Scorpion probes and DNA capture for genotype-specific detection of Giardia lamblia on fecal samples. J Clin Microbiol 43 :1256–1260.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Hoge CW, Echeverria P, Rajah R, Jacobs J, Malthouse S, Chapman E, Jimenez LM, Shlim DR, 1995. Prevalence of Cyclospora species and other enteric pathogens among children less than 5 years of age in Nepal. J Clin Microbiol 33 :3058–3060.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Amar CF, Dear PH, McLauchlin J, 2003. Detection and genotyping by real time PCR/RFLP analyses of Giardia duodenalis from human faeces. J Med Microbiol 52 :681–683.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Sulaiman IM, Jiang J, Singh A, Xiao L, 2004. Distribution of Giardia duodenalis genotypes and subgenotypes in raw urban wastewater in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Appl Environ Microbiol 70 :3776–3780.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Past two years Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 130 49 3
PDF Downloads 28 19 3
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

Giardia intestinalis Assemblages A and B Infections in Nepal

View More View Less
  • 1 Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia; Central Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal
Restricted access

Giardia intestinalis is comprised of two major genotypes, A and B, which may vary in their propensity to cause disease. We tested for the presence of these two genotypes in stool samples from patients with gastrointestinal symptoms in Nepal. A total of 1,096 clinical specimens were screened by microscopy, and 45 samples with G. intestinalis were identified. Giardia infection was confirmed in 35 of 45 samples by a Giardia specific real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. Genotyping of the Giardia PCR product by restriction fragment length polymorphism indicated that 74% (26 of 35) were assemblage B, 20% (7 of 35) were assemblage A, and 6% (2 of 35) were mixed assemblages.

Save