Vaughn DW, Hoke CH, 1992. The epidemiology of Japanese encephalitis: prospects for prevention. Epidemiol Rev 14 :197–221.
Halstead SB, Tsai TF, 2004. Japanese encephalitis vaccines. Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA, eds. Vaccines. Fourth edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 919–958.
Tsai TF, 2000. New initiatives for the control of Japanese encephalitis by vaccination. Minutes of a WHO/CVI meeting, October 13–15, 1998, Bangkok, Thailand. Vaccine 18 (Suppl 2):1–25.
Solomon T, Dung NM, Kneen R, Gainsborough M, Vaughn DW, Khanh VT, 2000. Japanese encephalitis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 68 :405–415.
Kalayanarooj S, 1995. Japanese encephalitis: Clinical manifestations, outcome and management. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 26 (Suppl 3):9.
Misra UK, Kalita J, 2002. Prognosis of Japanese encephalitis patients with dystonia compared to those with parkinsonian features only. Postgrad Med J 78 :238–241.
World Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia, 2006. Vaccine Preventable Disease Surveillance Bulletin. New Delhi, India: WHO, 10(40).
Sabchareon A, Yoksan S, 1998. Japanese encephalitis. Ann Trop Paediatr 18 (Suppl):S67–S71.
Burke DS, Nisalak A, Ussery MA, Laorakpongse T, Chantavibul S, 1985. Kinetics of IgM and IgG responses to Japanese encephalitis virus in human serum and cerebrospinal fluid. J Infect Dis 151 :1093–1099.
Cuzzubbo AJ, Endy TP, Vaughn DW, Solomon T, Nisalak A, Kalayanarooj S, Dung NM, Warrilow D, Aaskov J, Devine PL, 1999. Evaluation of a new commercially available immunoglobulin M capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of Japanese encephalitis infections. J Clin Microbiol 37 :3738–3741.
World Health Organization, 2005. Global measles and rubella laboratory network update. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 80 :384–388.
E-JED01C–Japanese encephalitis–Dengue IgM Combo website. Available at: http://www.panbio.com/modules.php?name=catalog&file=product_info&cPath=21&products_id=627. Accessed December 18, 2006.
JE DETECT IgM ELISA website. Available at: http://www.inbios.com/products.php?code=elisaJEM. Accessed December 18, 2006.
Hunt AR, Cropp CB, Chang GJ, 2001. A recombinant particulate antigen of Japanese encephalitis virus produced in stably-transformed cells is an effective noninfectious antigen and subunit immunogen. J Virol Methods 97 :133–149.
Ravi V, Desai A, Balaji M, Apte MP, Lakshman L, Subbakrishna DK, Sridharan G, Dhole TN, Ravikumar BV, 2006. Development and evaluation of a rapid IgM capture ELISA (JEV-Chex) for the diagnosis of Japanese encephalitis. J Clin Virol 35 :429–434.
Burke DS, Nisalak A, 1982. Detection of Japanese encephalitis virus immunoglobulin M antibodies in serum by antibody capture radioimmunoassay. J Clin Microbiol 15 :353–361.
Burke DS, Nisalak A, Ussery MA, 1982. Antibody capture immunoassay detection of Japanese encephalitis virus immunoglobulin M and G antibodies in cerebrospinal fluid. J Clin Microbiol 16 :1034–1042.
World Health Organization, 2006. WHO-Recommended Standards for Surveillance of Selected Vaccine-Preventable Diseases. WHO/V&B/03.01. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Past two years | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Full Text Views | 106 | 77 | 1 |
PDF Downloads | 30 | 28 | 1 |
Japanese encephalitis (JE) virus is a major cause of neurologic infection in Asia, but surveillance has been limited. Three JE immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits have recently been developed. The aim of this study was to evaluate their sensitivity, specificity, and usability using 360 acute-phase serum samples containing JE, dengue, or neither IgM antibody. The kits, manufactured by Panbio Limited, Inbios International, Inc., and XCyton Diagnostics Ltd, had high sensitivities of 89.3%, 99.2%, and 96.7%, respectively. The specificities were 99.2%, 56.1%, and 65.3%, respectively. When dengue IgM-positive samples were excluded, the kits had specificities of 98.4%, 96.1%, and 96.1%, respectively. The Panbio kit includes both JE and dengue antigens and appears to have an advantage in settings where dengue virus co-circulates, although further assessments in clinical settings are needed. This information is helpful in considering options for strengthening the laboratory component of JE surveillance.