Calisher CH, Mahy BWJ, 2003. Taxonomy: get it right or leave it alone (editorial). Am J Trop Med Hyg 68 :505–506.
van Regenmortel MHV, Fauquet CM, Bishop DHL, Carstens EB, Estes MK, Lemon SM, Maniloff J, Mayo MA, McGeoch DJ, Pringle CR, Wickner RB, 2000. Virus Taxonomy. Seventh Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Wildy P, 1971. Classification and nomenclature of viruses. First report of the International Committee on Nomenclature of Viruses. Monographs in Virology 5. Basel: S. Karger.
Dear Sir:
Mark Eberhard’s comments are greatly appreciated as they underline the general problem of acceptance of viral taxonomy and emphasize the reasons we published our remarks in the first place.
Dr. Eberhard suggested that we were proposing a taxonomic scheme, but we were not. What we were trying to do is
Dear Sir:
Mark Eberhard’s comments are greatly appreciated as they underline the general problem of acceptance of viral taxonomy and emphasize the reasons we published our remarks in the first place.
Dr. Eberhard suggested that we were proposing a taxonomic scheme, but we were not. What we were trying to do is