DNA Probes for Identifying the Members of the Anopheles punctulatus Complex in Papua New Guinea

Nigel W. Beebe Tropical Health Program, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Tropical Health Program and Entomology Department, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia

Search for other papers by Nigel W. Beebe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Desmond H. Foley Tropical Health Program, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Tropical Health Program and Entomology Department, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia

Search for other papers by Desmond H. Foley in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Allan Saul Tropical Health Program, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Tropical Health Program and Entomology Department, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia

Search for other papers by Allan Saul in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Leanne Cooper Tropical Health Program, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Tropical Health Program and Entomology Department, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia

Search for other papers by Leanne Cooper in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Joan H. Bryan Tropical Health Program, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Tropical Health Program and Entomology Department, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia

Search for other papers by Joan H. Bryan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Thomas R. Burkot Tropical Health Program, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Tropical Health Program and Entomology Department, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia

Search for other papers by Thomas R. Burkot in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Genomic DNA probes were made for five members of the Anopheles punctulatus complex of mosquitoes found in Papua New Guinea. Specific DNA probes were developed for An. punctulatus, An. koliensis, and three sibling species, An. farauti No. 4, An. farauti No. 5, and An. farauti No. 6, by differentially screening total genomic DNA libraries of individual species and sibling species with homologous DNA against heterologous DNA labeled with 32P. Probes ranged from 273 to 630 bp. Identification of species can be made from squash or dot blots using only a segment of the mosquito (i.e., head, thorax, abdomen, or even legs), allowing for concurrent analysis of the remainder of the mosquito for other epidemiologic characteristics.

Author Notes

Save