Introduction and Spread of Multi-Resistant Shigella dysenteriae I in Thailand

David N. Taylor
Search for other papers by David N. Taylor in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ladaporn Bodhidatta
Search for other papers by Ladaporn Bodhidatta in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J. Edward Brown
Search for other papers by J. Edward Brown in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Peter Echeverria
Search for other papers by Peter Echeverria in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Chaiyos KunanusontDivision of Epidemiology, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand

Search for other papers by Chaiyos Kunanusont in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Pimjai NaigowitDepartment of Microbiology, Sappasittiprasong Hospital, Ubon, Thailand

Search for other papers by Pimjai Naigowit in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Suvath Hanchalay
Search for other papers by Suvath Hanchalay in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Arunsri Chatkaeomorakot
Search for other papers by Arunsri Chatkaeomorakot in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Alf A. LindbergKarolinska Institute, Department of Clinical Bacteriology, Huddinge Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden

Search for other papers by Alf A. Lindberg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Outbreaks of Shigella dysenteriae I occurred in northeastern Thailand in the fall of 1986 and again in the spring and fall of 1987 for the first time in over 20 years. The epidemic strain of S. dysenteriae I was resistant to tetracycline, streptomycin, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, but susceptible to ampicillin. Trimethoprim resistance was chromosomally encoded by type I dihydrofolate reductase. In Ubon Province, where 10,000 cases of dysentery were reported, there were 3–5 cases of dysentery per 1,000 residents during the peak months, with 2–5 hospitalizations per 100 cases of reported dysentery. There were 2 deaths among 101 hospitalized, culture-confirmed cases. The overall case-fatality rate among reported cases of dysentery in this province was 0.9%. In contrast to S. flexneri infections, which occurred predominantly among children <5 years old, S. dysenteriae I infections occurred in all age groups. The large number of susceptibles appeared to be important in allowing rapid spread of S. dysenteriae I. In 1 village, 46% of 434 villagers reported dysentery; S. dysenteriae I was isolated from 24 out of 81 (30%) individuals cultured. Based on the prevalence of IgG antibody to S. dysenteriae I lipopolysaccharide, it was estimated that 76% of the villagers had been infected.

Save