Past two years Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 273 134 3
Full Text Views 11 2 0
PDF Downloads 7 1 0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Experimental Infection of Phlebotomus Papatasi with Sand Fly Fever Sicilian Virus

Douglas M. WattsDisease Assessment Division, U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland 21701

Search for other papers by Douglas M. Watts in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Carolyn MacDonaldDisease Assessment Division, U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland 21701

Search for other papers by Carolyn MacDonald in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Charles L. BaileyDisease Assessment Division, U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland 21701

Search for other papers by Charles L. Bailey in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
James M. MeeganDisease Assessment Division, U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland 21701

Search for other papers by James M. Meegan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
C. J. PetersDisease Assessment Division, U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland 21701

Search for other papers by C. J. Peters in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Kelly T. McKee Jr.Disease Assessment Division, U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland 21701

Search for other papers by Kelly T. McKee Jr. in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
View More View Less
Restricted access

Experimental studies were conducted to evaluate humans as hosts infecting the sand fly Phlebotomus papatasi with sand fly fever Sicilian (SFS) virus. Viral antigen and infectious virus circulated in the blood of infected volunteers on days 4 and 5 after intravenous inoculation with SFS virus. Viremia levels during the latter period were high enough to infect feeding sand flies, but only 13% (9/69) of the flies became infected. One out of every 3 infected sand flies that survived to feed a second time transmitted SFS to a hamster. These results confirm a vertebrate-sand fly-vertebrate transmission cycle for SFS virus, and demonstrate that horizontal transmission may contribute to the maintenance of this virus in nature.

Save