The Effect of Laboratory Colonization on the Vector-Pathogen Interactions of Egyptian Culex pipiens and Rift Valley Fever Virus

Thomas P. Gargan IIU.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Research and Training Center on Vectors of Disease, Ain Shams University, Frederick, Maryland 21701, Egypt

Search for other papers by Thomas P. Gargan II in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Charles L. BaileyU.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Research and Training Center on Vectors of Disease, Ain Shams University, Frederick, Maryland 21701, Egypt

Search for other papers by Charles L. Bailey in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Glen A. HigbeeU.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Research and Training Center on Vectors of Disease, Ain Shams University, Frederick, Maryland 21701, Egypt

Search for other papers by Glen A. Higbee in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Adel GadU.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Research and Training Center on Vectors of Disease, Ain Shams University, Frederick, Maryland 21701, Egypt

Search for other papers by Adel Gad in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Sherif El SaidU.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Research and Training Center on Vectors of Disease, Ain Shams University, Frederick, Maryland 21701, Egypt

Search for other papers by Sherif El Said in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
View More View Less
Restricted access

Field and laboratory findings implicated Culex pipiens as a vector of Rift Valley fever (RVF) virus during the 1977–1978 epizootics/epidemics in Egypt. This study evaluated changes in infection and transmission rates, and viral titers in F1 through F16 generation Cx. pipiens mosquitoes orally infected with RVF virus. Infection and transmission rates of RVF virus by this species changed significantly during the colonization process. However, the ultimate viral titers of either the transmitting or the infected nontransmitting mosquitoes were not affected by the colonization process. Following ingestion of virus, Cx. pipiens could be separated into three distinct subpopulations, an uninfected group and two types of infected mosquitoes—transmitters and nontransmitters. Transmitters contained significantly more virus (approximately 100-fold) than nontransmitters. These results demonstrated that not every infected female mosquito should be considered a competent vector, even if the species (population) is known to be a primary vector. Transmission was also accomplished by probing mosquitoes which were unsuccessful in obtaining a blood meal. These data document the long-held suspicion that vector competence studies based upon laboratory-colonized specimens may not represent the field situation.

Save