Acedapsone Treatment of Leprosy Patients: Response versus Drug Disposition

J. H. PetersLife Sciences Division, Stanford Research Institute, Leprosy Research Unit, Public Health Service Hospital, Department of Public Health, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, University of Sydney, Center for Disease Control, Public Health Service, Menlo Park, California 94025, Papua New Guinea

Search for other papers by J. H. Peters in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J. F. Murray Jr.Life Sciences Division, Stanford Research Institute, Leprosy Research Unit, Public Health Service Hospital, Department of Public Health, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, University of Sydney, Center for Disease Control, Public Health Service, Menlo Park, California 94025, Papua New Guinea

Search for other papers by J. F. Murray Jr. in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
G. R. GordonLife Sciences Division, Stanford Research Institute, Leprosy Research Unit, Public Health Service Hospital, Department of Public Health, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, University of Sydney, Center for Disease Control, Public Health Service, Menlo Park, California 94025, Papua New Guinea

Search for other papers by G. R. Gordon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
L. LevyLife Sciences Division, Stanford Research Institute, Leprosy Research Unit, Public Health Service Hospital, Department of Public Health, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, University of Sydney, Center for Disease Control, Public Health Service, Menlo Park, California 94025, Papua New Guinea

Search for other papers by L. Levy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D. A. RussellLife Sciences Division, Stanford Research Institute, Leprosy Research Unit, Public Health Service Hospital, Department of Public Health, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, University of Sydney, Center for Disease Control, Public Health Service, Menlo Park, California 94025, Papua New Guinea

Search for other papers by D. A. Russell in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
G. C. ScottLife Sciences Division, Stanford Research Institute, Leprosy Research Unit, Public Health Service Hospital, Department of Public Health, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, University of Sydney, Center for Disease Control, Public Health Service, Menlo Park, California 94025, Papua New Guinea

Search for other papers by G. C. Scott in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D. R. VincinLife Sciences Division, Stanford Research Institute, Leprosy Research Unit, Public Health Service Hospital, Department of Public Health, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, University of Sydney, Center for Disease Control, Public Health Service, Menlo Park, California 94025, Papua New Guinea

Search for other papers by D. R. Vincin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
C. C. ShepardLife Sciences Division, Stanford Research Institute, Leprosy Research Unit, Public Health Service Hospital, Department of Public Health, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, University of Sydney, Center for Disease Control, Public Health Service, Menlo Park, California 94025, Papua New Guinea

Search for other papers by C. C. Shepard in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

In 22 lepromatous Filipino patients receiving their first injection of 225 mg acedapsone (DADDS), dapsone (DDS), and monoacetyl DDS (MADDS) were present in plasma in approximately equal quantities. Peak levels of parent drug, DDS, and MADDS occurred between 22 and 35 days. The half-times of disappearance (T½) from plasma were 43 days for DDS and MADDS and 46 days for DADDS. Acetylator phenotyping with sulfamethazine (SMZ) and DDS showed that 17 patients were rapid and 5 patients were slow acetylators. Correlations between acetylation of SMZ and DDS after DDS and of acetylation of DDS after DDS and DADDS were highly significant. However, acetylation of DDS after DADDS did not differentiate the patients into acetylator phenotypes. The T½ of DDS after DDS in the patients was directly related to the minimum levels of DDS at 77 days after DADDS treatment. These minimum levels were 8-fold higher than the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of DDS for Mycobacterium leprae in mice and rats, but not all patients responded satisfactorily. No relationship could be demonstrated between the bacteriologic response and any of the pharmacologic parameters examined in these Filipino patients. In a companion study, minimum levels of DADDS, MADDS, and DDS were determined in 447 leprosy patients of all disease types from the Karimui District of Papua New Guinea who had been receiving 225 mg DADDS every 70 to 80 days for the past 5 years. All patients exhibited DDS levels above the MIC of DDS for M. leprae, no significant differences in plasma sulfone levels were found among disease types, no relationship between rate of healing in paucibacillary patients and sulfone levels were found, and type of response in multibacillary patients and sulfone levels were unrelated. No substantial accumulation of the sulfones in the Karimui patients receiving continuous therapy with DADDS for 5 years was indicated from a comparison with the levels in the Filipino patients following a single injection of DADDS.

Save