Microbiological Profile of Periprosthetic Joint Infections: A Retrospective Analysis from North India

Souradeep Chowdhury Department of Medicine and Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India;

Search for other papers by Souradeep Chowdhury in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sunit Sikdar Department of Medicine and Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India;

Search for other papers by Sunit Sikdar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Rajesh Malhotra Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India;

Search for other papers by Rajesh Malhotra in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Benu Dhawan Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Search for other papers by Benu Dhawan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

ABSTRACT.

With the rise in total joint arthroplasties, prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) have become a significant complication, leading to high morbidity. The causative organisms of PJIs vary by region, and the rates of drug-resistant organisms are growing, thus complicating the initial empiric choice of antibiotics. This retrospective study analyzed records of patients with orthopedic implants and intraoperative tissue samples sent for sonication and culture at a tertiary care hospital in India. The most common organism was Staphylococcus aureus (14 out of 86 bacterial isolates, 16.3%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12 out of 86, 13.9%), and both Staphylococcus epidermidis and Klebsiella pneumoniae (11 each out of 86, 12.8%). There was a high prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms, and 35% of the gram-negative organisms were carbapenem resistant. Our study reveals that in our setting, PJIs are chiefly driven by multidrug resistant gram-negative bacteria.

    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 157.93 KB)

Author Notes

Current contact information: Souradeep Chowdhury and Sunit Sikdar, Department of Medicine and Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India, E-mails: chowdhurysouradeep150@gmail.com and sikdarsunit@gmail.com. Rajesh Malhotra, Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India, E-mail: rmalhotra62@gmail.com. Benu Dhawan, Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India, E-mail: dhawanb@gmail.com.

Address correspondence to Benu Dhawan, Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, 2nd Floor, Academic Block, New Delhi, India, 110029. E-mail: dhawanb@gmail.com
  • 1.

    Tande AJ, Patel R, 2014. Prosthetic joint infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 27: 302–345.

  • 2.

    Porrino J, Wang A, Moats A, Mulcahy H, Kani K, 2020. Prosthetic joint infections: Diagnosis, management, and complications of the two-stage replacement arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiol 49: 847–859.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Bauer TW, Parvizi J, Kobayashi N, Krebs V, 2006. Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88: 869–882.

  • 4.

    Parvizi J, Tan TL, Goswami K, Higuera C, Della Valle C, Chen AF, Shohat N, 2018. The 2018 definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection: An evidence-based and validated criteria. J Arthroplasty 33: 1309–1314.e2.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Sebastian S, Malhotra R, Sreenivas V, Kapil A, Chaudhry R, Dhawan B, 2019. A clinico-microbiological study of prosthetic joint infections in an Indian tertiary care hospital: Role of universal 16S rRNA gene polymerase chain reaction and sequencing in diagnosis. Indian J Orthop 53: 646–654.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Pulido L, Ghanem E, Joshi A, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J, 2008. Periprosthetic joint infection: The incidence, timing, and predisposing factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466: 1710–1715.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Patel R, 2023. Periprosthetic joint infection. N Engl J Med 388: 251–262.

Past two years Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 317 317 80
Full Text Views 13 13 8
PDF Downloads 13 13 7
 

 

 

 
 
Affiliate Membership Banner
 
 
Research for Health Information Banner
 
 
CLOCKSS
 
 
 
Society Publishers Coalition Banner
Save