Past two years Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 210 71 0
Full Text Views 3 0 0
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Rat Ectoparasite Surveys in Relation to Murine Typhus Fever in Puerto Rico

Irving FoxSchool of Medicine, School of Tropical Medicine, San Juan, Puerto Rico

Search for other papers by Irving Fox in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Ileana García-MollSchool of Medicine, School of Tropical Medicine, San Juan, Puerto Rico

Search for other papers by Ileana García-Moll in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
View More View Less
Restricted access

Summary

A rat ectoparasite survey of the City of San Juan, Puerto Rico, was made from 7 December 1956 to 31 December 1960. Data obtained from 964 rats collected from 15 April 1957 to 4 May 1958, 747 rats collected in 1958–59, and 573 in 1959–60 were compared with similar data obtained in 1946–47 and 1954–55. In 1946–47 54% of the rats were infested with Xenopsylla cheopis; in 1954–55, 16%; in 1957–58, 6.0%; in 1958–59, 3.3%; and 1959–60, 2.6%. Other common rat ectoparasites, Laelaps nuttalli, Ornithonyssus bacoti, Listrophoroides expansus, and Polyplax spinulosa increased in abundance. In particular, L. nuttalli showed marked increases. Ornithodoros puertoricensis which affected 26.8% of the rats in 1946–47 infested only 5.4% in 1959–60. Designed rat flea insecticidal control measures have never been applied in Puerto Rico. The rat population has always been high. Fleas were uncommon in poorly sanitated areas and more often found in well sanitated places subject to other pest control activities. Weather Bureau records indicated that precipitation, humidity or temperature could not account for the rat flea reduction. Of 998 rat sera subjected to the complement fixation test with U. S. Army group specific typhus antigen at 1:10 dilution, 804 were negative and 194 were anticomplementary. In 1954 and succeeding years including 1960 there were no cases of murine typhus fever reported from the City of San Juan and in 1958, 1959, and 1960 none in Puerto Rico as a whole. Since a great reduction in rat flea population occurred and no infection in rats was found, there is no reason to doubt the reported morbidity or to postulate that the use of antibiotics had anything to do with the rate. It was concluded that investigations on the ecological circumstances of the association of arthropods, particularly mites, with rat fleas are necessary, if the question of why the rat flea population was decimated is to be answered.

Save