1921
Volume 87, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645

Abstract

Abstract.

How does specific information about contamination in a household's drinking water affect water handling behavior? We randomly split a sample of households in rural Andhra Pradesh, India. The treatment group observed a contamination test of the drinking water in their own household storage vessel; while they were waiting for their results, they were also provided with a list of actions that they could take to remedy contamination if they tested positive. The control group received no test or guidance. The drinking water of nearly 90% of tested households showed evidence of contamination by fecal bacteria. They reacted by purchasing more of their water from commercial sources but not by making more time-intensive adjustments. Providing salient evidence of risk increases demand for commercial clean water.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0051
2012-07-02
2020-08-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/14761645/87/1/18.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0051&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Chen Y, Van Geen A, Graziano JH, Pfaff A, Madajewicz M, Parvez F, Hussain AZMI, Slavkovich V, Islam T, Ahsan H, 2007. Reduction in urinary arsenic levels in response to arsenic mitigation efforts in Araihazar, Bangladesh. Environ Health Perspect 115: 917.[Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Madajewicz M, Pfaff A, Van Geen A, Graziano J, Hussein I, Momotaj H, Sylvi R, Ahsan H, 2007. Can information alone change behavior? Response to arsenic contamination of groundwater in Bangladesh. J Dev Econ 84: 731754.[Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Pattanayak SK, Pfaff A, 2009. Behavior, environment, and health in developing countries: evaluation and valuation. Annual Review of Resource Economics 1: 183217.[Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Somanathan E, 2010. Effects of information on environmental quality in developing countries. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 4: 275.[Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. McGuire WJ, 1984. Public communication as a strategy for inducing health-promoting behavioral change. Prev Med 13: 299313.[Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Scott B, Curtis V, Rabie T, Garbrah-Aidoo N, 2007. Health in our hands, but not in our heads: understanding hygiene motivation in Ghana. Health Policy Plan 22: 225.[Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Patil SR, Pattanayak SK, 2010. Behaviors exposed: panel data evidence on environmental health externalities in rural India. Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists; Montreal, Canada, June 29, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Poulos C, Pattanayak S, Patil S, Yang J-C, 2009. Monitoring and Evaluation of Health and Socio-Economic Impacts of Water and Sanitation Initiatives in Andhra Pradesh, India. Report on Medium-Term Impacts. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Jalan J, Somanathan E, 2008. The importance of being informed: experimental evidence on demand for environmental quality. J Dev Econ 87: 1428.[Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bennear L, Tarozzi A, Pfaff A, Soumya H, Ahmed KM, van Geen A, 2010. Bright Lines, Risk Beliefs, and Risk Avoidance: Evidence from a Randomized Intervention in Bangladesh. Duke University Working Paper. Durham, NC: Duke University.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Davis J, Pickering AJ, Rogers K, Mamuya S, Boehm AB, 2011. The effects of informational interventions on household water management, hygiene behaviors, stored drinking water quality, and hand contamination in peri-urban Tanzania. Am J Trop Med Hyg 84: 184191.[Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Luoto J, Levine D, Albert J, 2009. Information and Persuasion: Achieving Safe Water Behaviors in Kenya: Working Paper. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Manja K, Maurya M, Rao K, 1982. A simple field test for the detection of faecal pollution in drinking water. Bull World Health Organ 60: 797.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Pathak S, Gopal K, 2005. Efficiency of modified H 2 S test for detection of faecal contamination in water. Environ Monit Assess 108: 5965.[Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Pattanayak SK, Yang J-C, Poulos C, Patil SR, 2010. How valuable are environmental health interventions? Evaluation of water and sanitation programs in India. Bull World Health Organ 88: 535542.[Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. WHO, 2004. Environmental Burden of Disease Data. Available at: http://www.who.int/quantifying_ehimpacts/national/countryprofile/intro/en/index.html. Accessed October 22, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Prüss-Üstün A, Corvalán C, 2006. Preventing Disease Through Healthy Environments. Towards an Estimate of the Environmental Burden of Disease. Geneva: World Health Organization.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Evans W, Pattanayak S, Young S, Buszi J, Rai S, 2011. Systematic Review of Social Marketing of Water and Sanitation and Anti-Malaria Products. Public Health Communication & Marketing Program. Washington, DC: George Washington University.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Zwane AP, Zinman J, Van Dusen E, Pariente W, Null C, Miguel E, Kremer M, Karlan DS, Hornbeck R, Giné X, 2011. Being surveyed can change later behavior and related parameter estimates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 18211826.[Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0051
Loading
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0051
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplementary PDF

  • Received : 22 Jan 2012
  • Accepted : 18 Apr 2012
  • Published online : 02 Jul 2012

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error