Volume 86, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645



Novel malaria monitoring and evaluation (M&E) tools are urgently needed to complement the current “gold standard” Malaria Indicator Surveys (MIS). Rapid up scaling of malaria control efforts is resulting in substantial reductions in malaria burden across sub-Saharan Africa. As transmission goes down, timely, accurate, sub-national, and district level burden estimates are needed to guide increasingly targeted control efforts in remaining hotspot areas. To test a novel district level M&E tool, we have conducted a continuous (“rolling”) MIS (rMIS) since May 2010 covering 50 villages in Chikhwawa district in southern Malawi, essentially adapting an existing cross-sectional evaluation tool into a continuous monitoring tool. Here, we report on our experience after completing the first full year of monthly data collection focusing on the methods, operational aspects, and estimated costs of rMIS in a programmatic setting. The potential applicability of this promising M&E approach for district-level program managers and control efforts is discussed.


Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. O'Meara WP, Bejon P, Mwangi TW, Okiro EA, Peshu N, Snow RW, Newton CR, Marsh K, 2008. Effect of a fall in malaria transmission on morbidity and mortality in Kilifi, Kenya. Lancet 372: 15551562.[Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ceesay SJ, Casals-Pascual C, Erskine J, Anya SE, Duah NO, Fulford AJ, Sesay SS, Abubakar I, Dunyo S, Sey O, Palmer A, Fofana M, Corrah T, Bojang KA, Whittle HC, Greenwood BM, Conway DJ, 2008. Changes in malaria indices between 1999 and 2007 in The Gambia: a retrospective analysis. Lancet 372: 15451554.[Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kleinschmidt I, Schwabe C, Benavente L, Torrez M, Ridl FC, Segura JL, Ehmer P, Nchama GN, 2009. Marked increase in child survival after four years of intensive malaria control. Am J Trop Med Hyg 80: 882888.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. malERA Consultative Group on Monitoring Evaluation and Surveillance, 2011. A research agenda for malaria eradication: monitoring, evaluation, and surveillance. PLoS Med 8: e1000400.[Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Rowe AK, 2009. Potential of integrated continuous surveys and quality management to support monitoring, evaluation, and the scale-up of health interventions in developing countries. Am J Trop Med Hyg 80: 971979.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. USAID. External Evaluation of the Peru Continuous Survey Experiment (December 2007). Available at: http://www.ghtechproject.com/resources.aspx. Accessed July 5, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. USAID. Nicaragua Health Program Evaluation (April 2008). Available at: www.ghtechproject.com/Attachment.axd?ID=1e06e02d-70bb-4671-b564-258f5ed70d26. Accessed July 5, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bryce J, Steketee R, 2010. Continuous surveys and quality management in low-income countries: a good idea. Am J Trop Med Hyg 82: 360; author reply 361–362.[Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. National Statistical Office (NSO) [Malawi] and ORC Macro, 2005. Malawi Demographic and Health Survey 2004. Calverton, MD: NSO and ORC Macro.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Roll Back Malaria. Malaria Indicators Surveys. Available at: http://www.malariasurveys.org/. Accessed June 2, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Received : 22 Jun 2011
  • Accepted : 14 Sep 2011
  • Published online : 01 Jan 2012
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error