Volume 83, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645



A commercial Dengue Duo rapid test kit was evaluated for early dengue diagnosis by detection of dengue virus NS1 antigen and immunoglobulin M (IgM)/IgG antibodies. A total of 420 patient serum samples were subjected to real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), in-house IgM capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), hemagglutination inhibition assay, and the SD Dengue Duo rapid test. Of the 320 dengue acute and convalescent sera, dengue infection was detected by either serology or RT-PCR in 300 samples (93.75%), as compared with 289 samples (90.31%) in the combined SD Duo NS1/IgM. The NS1 detection rate is inversely proportional, whereas the IgM detection rate is directly proportional to the presence of IgG antibodies. The sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing acute dengue infection in the SD Duo NS1/IgM were 88.65% and 98.75%, respectively. The assay is sensitive and highly specific. Detection of both NS1 and IgM by SD Duo gave comparable detection rate by either serology or RT-PCR.


Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Gubler DJ, Meltzer M, , 1999. Impact of dengue/dengue hemorrhagic fever on the developing world. Adv Virus Res 53: 3570.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  2. World Health Organization, 2000. Dengue haemorrhagic fever: diagnosis, treatment and control. Handbook of the World Health Organization. Geneva: WHO, 184. [Google Scholar]
  3. Innis BL, Porterfield JS, , 1995. Dengue and dengue haemorrhagic fever. , ed. Exotic Viral Infections. London: Chapman & Hall Medical, 103140. [Google Scholar]
  4. Blacksell SD, Mammen MP, Thongpaseuth S, Gibbons RV, Jarman RG, Jenjaroen K, Nisalak A, Phetsouvanh R, Newton PN, Day NP, , 2008. Evaluation of the Panbio dengue virus nonstructural 1 antigen detection and immunoglobulin M antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for the diagnosis of acute dengue infections in Laos. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 60: 4349.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dussart P, Labeau B, Lagathu G, Louis P, Nunes MR, Rodrigues SG, Storck-Hermann C, Cesaire R, Morvan J, Flamand M, Baril L, , 2006. Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay for detection of dengue virus NS1 antigen in human serum. Clin Vaccine Immunol 13: 11851189.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kumarasamy V, Wahab AH, Chua SK, Hassan Z, Chem YK, Mohamad M, Chua KB, , 2007. Evaluation of a commercial dengue NS1 antigen-capture ELISA for laboratory diagnosis of acute dengue virus infection. J Virol Methods 140: 7579.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  7. McBride W, , 2009. Evaluation of dengue NS1 test kits for the diagnosis of dengue fever. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 64: 3136.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sekaran SD, Lan EC, Mahesawarappa KB, Appanna R, Subramaniam G, , 2007. Evaluation of a dengue NS1 capture ELISA assay for the rapid detection of dengue. J Infect Dev Ctries 1: 182188. [Google Scholar]
  9. Young PR, Hilditch PA, Bletchly C, , 2000. An antigen capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay reveals high levels of the dengue virus protein NS1 in the sera of infected patients. J Clin Microbiol 38: 10531057. [Google Scholar]
  10. Alcon S, Talarmin A, Debruyne M, Falconar A, Deubel V, Flammand M, , 2002. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay specific to dengue virus type 1 nonstructural protein NS1 reveals circulation of the antigen in blood during the acute phase of disease in patient experiencing primary or secondary infection. J Clin Microbiol 40: 376381.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shu P, Huang J, , 2004. Current advances in dengue diagnosis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 11: 642650. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gubler DJ, , 1996. Serological diagnosis of dengue haemorrhagic fever. Dengue Bull 20: 2023. [Google Scholar]
  13. Innis B, Gubler DJ, Kuno G, , 1997. Antibody responses to dengue virus infections. , eds. Dengue and Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever. New York: CAB International, 221243. [Google Scholar]
  14. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki, 2000. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 284: 30433045.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kuberski TT, Rosen L, , 1977. A simple technique for detection of dengue antigen in mosquitoes by immunofluorescence. Am J Trop Med Hyg 26: 533537. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gubler DJ, Kuno G, Sather GE, Velez M, Oliver A, , 1984. Use mosquitoes cell culture and specific monoclonal antibodies for routine surveillance of dengue viruses. Am J Trop Med Hyg 33: 158165. [Google Scholar]
  17. Clarke DH, Cassals J, , 1958. Techniques for haemagglutination and haemagglutination inhibition with arthropod-borne viruses. Am J Trop Med Hyg 7: 561573. [Google Scholar]
  18. World Health Organization, 1997. Management of dengue epidemic. Regional Guidelines on Dengue/DHF Prevention & Control. WHO/SEARO. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lam SK, Devi S, Pang T, , 1987. Detection of specific IgM in dengue infection. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 18: 532538. [Google Scholar]
  20. Yong YK, Thayan R, Chong HT, Tan CT, Sekaran SD, , 2007. Rapid detection and serotyping of dengue virus by multiplex RT-PCR and real-time SYBR green RT-PCR. Singapore Med J 448: 662668. [Google Scholar]
  21. Vajpayee M, Singh UB, Seth P, Broor S, , 2001. Comparative evaluation of various commercial assays for diagnosis of dengue fever. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Health 32: 472475. [Google Scholar]
  22. Dussart P, Petit L, Labeau B, Bremand L, Leduc A, Moua D, Matheus S, Baril L, , 2008. Evaluation of two new commercial tests for the diagnosis of acute dengue virus infection using NS1 antigen detection in human. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2: e280.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lapphra K, Sangsharaswichai A, Chokephaibulkit K, Tiengrim S, Piriyakarnsakul W, Chakorn T, Yoksan S, Wattanamongkolsil L, Thamlikitkul V, , 2008. Evaluation of an NS1 antigen detection for diagnosis of acute dengue infection in patients with acute febrile illness. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 60: 387391.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

Supplementary data for Figures 1 and 2

  • Received : 22 Feb 2010
  • Accepted : 11 May 2010
  • Published online : 07 Sep 2010

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error