1921
Volume 83, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645

Abstract

Abstract.

In developed countries, informed consent is based on the autonomy of the individual, a written description of the studies proposed, and previous experience of the participant with Western medicine. Consent is documented by the signature of the participant and supervised by institutional review boards (IRBs), which have conflicts of interest because they are also responsible for limiting institutional liability. In developing countries, the initial decision-making for informed consent is typically vested in the community rather than the individual, and illiteracy is common—limiting the value of written documents and signatures. The challenges in developing countries are exacerbated by the fact that persons at greatest risk of disease are often illiterate, have limited experience with Western medicine, and have limited understanding of the scientific rationale for the studies proposed. Given these differences, it is unrealistic to expect that consent strategies used in developed countries would be effective in such diverse settings.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0014
2010-10-05
2018-12-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/14761645/83/4/743.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0014&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Shalala D, , 2000. Protecting research subjects—what must be done. N Engl J Med 343: 808810.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  2. Spicer CM, , 2000. Federal oversight and regulation of human subjects research—an update. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 10: 261264.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anonymous, 1998. Protection of human research subjects—HHS: notice of proposed rulemaking. Fed Regist 63: 2779427804. [Google Scholar]
  4. Faden RR, Beauchamp TL, , eds., 1986. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 3330. [Google Scholar]
  5. Tangwa GB, , 2000. Moral agency, moral worth and the question of double standards in medical research in developing countries. Dev World Bioeth 1: 156162.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  6. Tangwa GB, , 2000. The traditional African perception of a person: some implications for bioethics. Hastings Cent Rep 30: 3943.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barrett RJ, Parker DB, , 2003. Rites of consent: negotiating research participation in diverse cultures. Monash Bioeth Rev 22: 926.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  8. Benatar SF, , 2002. Reflections and recommendations on research ethics in developing countries. Soc Sci Med 54: 11311141.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bhutta ZA, , 2002. Ethics in international health research: a perspective from the developing world. Bull World Health Organ 80: 114120. [Google Scholar]
  10. Sanchez S, Salazar G, Tijero M, Diaz S, , 2001. Informed consent procedures: responsibilities of researchers in developing countries. Bioethics 15: 398412.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  11. Enwonwu CO, Falkler WA, Jr Idigbe EO, Afolabi BM, Ibrahim M, Onwujekwe D, Savage O, Meeks VI, , 1999. Pathogenesis of cancrum oris (noma): confounding interactions of malnutrition with infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg 60: 223232. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lavery JV, Grady C, Wahl ER, Emanuel EJ, , 2007. Ethical Issues in International Biomedical Research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 263294. [Google Scholar]
  13. Haworth L, Haworth L, , 1986. The concept of autonomy. , ed. Autonomy: An Essay in Philosophical Psychology and Ethics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 146. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dworkin G, , 1988. The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 3120.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dalla-Vorgia P, Lascaratos J, Skiadas P, Garanis-Papadatos T, , 2001. Is consent in medicine a concept only of modern times? J Med Ethics 27: 5961.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  16. Horner J, , 2003. Morality, ethics, and law: introductory concepts. Semin Speech Lang 24: 263274.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  17. Majumdar SK, , 1996. Aristotle's ethical theory and modern health care. Bull Indian Inst Hist Med Hyderabad 26: 7580. [Google Scholar]
  18. Brema TA, , 1999. Proposed revisions to the Declaration of Helsinki. N Engl J Med 341: 527531.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  19. Knippenberg R, Alihonou E, Soucat A, Oyegbite K, Calivis M, Hopwood I, Niimi R, Diallo MP, Conde M, Ofosu-Amaah S, , 1997. Implementation of the Bamako Initiative: strategies in Benin and Guinea. Int J Health Plann Manage 12 (Suppl 1): S29S47.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  20. Das PK, , 1991. Community participation in vector borne disease control: facts and fancies. Ann Soc Belg Med Trop 71 (Suppl 1): 233242. [Google Scholar]
  21. Uzochukwu BS, Onwujekwe OE, Akpala CO, , 2002. Effect of the Bamako Initiative drug-revolving fund on the availability and rational use of essential drugs in primary care facilities in south-east Nigeria. Health Policy Plan 17: 378383.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  22. Soucat A, Gandaho T, Levy-Bruhl D, de Bethune X, Alihonou E, Ortiz C, Gbedonou P, Adovohekpe P, Camara O, Ndiaye JM, Dieng B, Knippenberg R, , 1997. Health seeking behaviour and household health expenditures in Benin and Guinea: the equity implications of the Bamako Initiative. Int J Health Plann Manage 12 (Suppl 1): S137S163.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  23. Oguz NY, , 2003. Research ethics committees in developing countries and informed consent: with special reference to Turkey. J Lab Clin Med 141: 292296.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  24. Willerson JT, Kereiakes DJ, , 2003. Clinical research and future improvement in clinical care: the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and future difficulties but optimism for the way forward. Circulation 108: 919920.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  25. Joffe S, Cook EF, Cleary PD, Clark JW, Weeks JC, , 2001. Quality of informed consent: a new measure of understanding among research subjects. J Natl Cancer Inst 93: 139147.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  26. Fitzgerald DW, Marotte C, Verdier RI, Johnson WD, Jr Pape JW, , 2002. Comprehension during informed consent in a less-developed country. Lancet 360: 13011302.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  27. Angell M, , 2000. Investigators' responsibilities for human subjects in developing countries. N Engl J Med 342: 967969.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  28. Macfarlane S, Racelis M, Muli-Musiime F, , 2000. Public health in developing countries. Lancet 356: 841846.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  29. Truog RD, , 1996. Is “informed right of refusal” the same as “informed consent?” J Clin Ethics 7: 8789. [Google Scholar]
  30. van Bogaert L-J, , 2006. Rights and duties to non-consenting patients: informed refusal in the developing world. Dev World Bioeth 6: 1322.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  31. Featherstone K, Donovan JL, , 1998. Random allocation or allocation at random: patients' perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 317: 11771180.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  32. Llewellyn-Thomas HA, McGreal MJ, Thiel EC, Fine S, Erlichman C, , 1991. Patients' willingness to enter clinical trials: measuring the association with perceived benefit and preference for decision participation. Soc Sci Med 32: 3542.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  33. Taylor KM, Kelner M, , 1987. Informed consent: the physicians' perspective. Soc Sci Med 24: 135143.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  34. Macpherson CC, , 2001. Ethics committees. Research ethics: beyond the guidelines. Dev World Bioeth 1: 5768.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  35. Arda B, , 2000. Evaluation of research ethics committees in Turkey. J Med Ethics 26: 459461.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sollitto S, Hoffman S, Mehlman M, Lederman RJ, Youngner SJ, Lederman MM, , 2003. Intrinsic conflicts of interest in clinical research: a need for disclosure. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 13: 8391.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  37. Morin K, Rakatansky H, Riddick FA, Jr Morse LJ, O'Bannon JM, 3rd Goldrich MS, Ray P, Weiss M, Sade RM, Spillman MA, , 2002. Managing conflicts of interest in the conduct of clinical trials. J Am Med Assoc 287: 7884.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  38. LeVine RA, Dexter E, Velasco P, LeVine S, Joshi AR, Stuebing KW, Tapia-Uribe FM, , 1994. Maternal literacy and health care in three countries: a preliminary report. Health Transit Rev 4: 186191. [Google Scholar]
  39. Macklin R, , 2000. Informed consent for research: international perspectives. J Am Med Womens Assoc 55: 290293. [Google Scholar]
  40. Doumbo OK, Krogstad DJ, , 1998. Doctoral training of African scientists. Am J Trop Med Hyg 58: 127132. [Google Scholar]
  41. McPherson CC, , 2001. Research ethics: beyond the guidelines. Dev World Bioeth 1: 5768.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  42. Minnies D, Hawkridge T, Hannekom W, Ehrlich R, London L, Hussey G, , 2008. Evaluation of the quality of informed consent in a vaccine field trial in a developing country. BMC Med Ethics 9: 15.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  43. Krosin MT, Klitzman R, Levin B, Cheng J, Ranney ML, , 2006. Problems in comprehension of informed consent in rural and periurban Mali, West Africa. Clin Trials 3: 306313.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0014
Loading
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0014
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Received : 07 Jan 2010
  • Accepted : 17 May 2010

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error