1921
Volume 82, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645

Abstract

Abstract.

The epidemiology of Chagas disease was studied in five rural communities located in the eastern region of the Panama Province. Serological tests for infection revealed a prevalence of 5.88% (12/204). Hemocultures coupled with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis showed a infection rate of 5.88% (12/204). An overall trypanosome infection index of 11.76% (24/204) was detected in this population. A total of 121 triatomine specimens were collected in domestic and peridomestic habitats. was confirmed as the predominant species. Molecular analysis showed that 17.8% (13/73) of the examined insects were positive for , 17.8% (13/73) for and 35.6% (26/73) presented mixed infections. Among 73 evaluated, 16.4% (12/73) contained opossum blood meals. The epidemiological implications of these findings are discussed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0397
2010-04-05
2020-10-31
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/14761645/82/4/580.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0397&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Dias JC, 2000. Chagas disease control and the natural history of human Chagas disease: a possible interaction? Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 95: (Suppl II): 1422.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dias JCP, Silveira AC, Schofield CJ, 2002. The impact of Chagas disease control in Latin America: a review. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 97: 603612.[Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Moncayo A, 2003. Chagas disease: current epidemiological trends after the interruption of vectorial and transfusional transmission in the Southern Cone countries. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 98: 577591.[Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ponce C, 2007. Current situation of Chagas disease in Central America. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 102: (Suppl 1): 41–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Vasquez AM, Samudio FE, Saldana A, Paz HM, Calzada JE, 2004. Eco-epidemiological aspects of Trypanosoma cruzi, Trypanosoma rangeli and their vector (Rhodnius pallescens) in Panama. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 46: 217222.[Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Sousa OE, Johnson CM, 1971. Frequency and distribution of Trypanosoma cruzi and Trypanosoma rangeli in the Republic of Panama. Am J Trop Med Hyg 20: 405410.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Saldaña A, Samudio F, Miranda F, Herrera LM, Saavedra S, Cáceres L, Bayard V, Calzada JE, 2005. Predominance of Trypanosoma rangeli infection in children from a Chagas disease endemic area in the west-shore of the Panama Canal. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 100: 729731.[Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Abad-Franch F, Palomeque FS, Aguilar HM 5th, Miles MA, 2005. Field ecology of sylvatic Rhodnius populations (Heteroptera, Triatominae): risk factors for palm tree infestation in western Ecuador. Trop Med Int Health 10: 12581266.[Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Whitlaw JT, Chaniotis BN, 1978. Palm trees and Chagas' disease in Panama. Am J Trop Med Hyg 27: 873881.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Saldana A, Sousa OE, Orn A, 1995. Immunoparasitological studies of Trypanosoma cruzi low virulence clones from Panama: humoral immune responses and antigenic cross-reactions with Trypanosoma rangeli in experimentally infected mice. Scand J Immunol 42: 644650.[Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Vasquez JE, Krusnell J, Orn A, Sousa OE, Harris RA, 1997. Serological diagnosis of Trypanosoma rangeli infected patients. A comparison of different methods and its implications for the diagnosis of Chagas' disease. Scand J Immunol 45: 322330.[Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chiurillo MA, Crisante G, Rojas A, Peralta A, Dias M, Guevara P, Añez N, Ramírez JL, 2003. Detection of Trypanosoma cruzi and Trypanosoma rangeli infection by duplex PCR assay based on telomeric sequences. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 10: 775779.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Calzada JE, Pineda V, Montalvo E, Alvarez D, Santamaría AM, Samudio F, Bayard F, Cáceres L, Saldaña A, 2006. Human trypanosome infection and the presence of intradomicile Rhodnius pallescens in the western border of the Panama Canal, Panama. Am J Trop Med Hyg 74: 762765.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Pineda V, Montalvo E, Alvarez D, Santamaría A, Calzada JE, Saldaña A, 1998. Feeding sources and trypanosome infection index of Rhodnius pallescens in a Chagas disease endemic area of Amador County, Panama. Rev Med Trop de São Paulo 50: 113116.[Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Basso B, Cervetta L, Moretti E, Carlier Y, Truyens C, 2004. Acute Trypanosoma cruzi infection: IL-12, IL-18, TNF, sTNFR and NO in T. rangeli-vaccinated mice. Vaccine 15-16: 18681872.[Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Palau MT, Mejia AJ, Vergara U, Zuniga CA, 2003. Action of Trypanosoma rangeli in infections with virulent Trypanosoma cruzi populations. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 98: 543548.[Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0397
Loading
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0397
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Received : 13 Jul 2009
  • Accepted : 17 Dec 2009
  • Published online : 05 Apr 2010
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error