1921
Volume 82, Issue 5
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645

Abstract

Abstract.

Congenital transmission (CT) has acquired relevance in Chagas disease (CHD). A cohort of pregnant CHD women (4,355) and their babies were studied in the period 1994–2004. Children were excluded when they had received blood transfusions, or were born or had been in endemic areas; CT rate was 6.1%. Babies were diagnosed between months 1 and 5 in 68.9% of the cases and between months 6 and 12 in 31.1%. In the latter group, parasitemia was detected in 94% and serology in 74.7%. Between months 6 and 9, parasitemia diagnosed 36.2% ( = 0.000) more cases than serology. If serology had been the diagnosis method, those children would have been considered CT free. Taking the overall outcomes, 38.1% of babies were CT free, and 55.8% did not complete the follow-up. Establishing CT as a public health priority and improving first-line health service, congenital CHD coverage could be more efficient in endemic countries.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2010.08-0383
2010-05-01
2019-03-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/14761645/82/5/838.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2010.08-0383&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Silveira CA, Rojas de Arias A, Segura E, Guillén G, Pinto Dias JC, Lorca M, Schenone H, Valdez Padilla J, Russomando G, Salvatella R, , 2002. El control de la enfermedad de Chagas en los países del Cono Sur de América. Historia de una iniciativa internacional OPS, 1991–2001. Available at: http://www.paho.org/Spanish/ad/dpc/cd/dch-historia-incosur.pdf. Accessed August 2009. [Google Scholar]
  2. OPS/MSF, 2005. Consulta técnica regional sobre Organización y Estructura de la atención médica del enfermo o infectado por Trypanosoma cruzi (enfermedad de Chagas) Montevideo, Uruguay. 13–14 Octubre OPS/DPC/CD/353/05. Available at: http://www.paho.org/Spanish/AD/DPC/CD/dch-consulta-ops-msf-2005.pdf. Accessed August 2009. [Google Scholar]
  3. Carlier Y, Torrico F, , 2003. Congenital infection with Trypanosoma cruzi: from mechanism of transmission to strategies for diagnosis and control. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 36: 767771.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  4. OPS, 2004. Consulta sobre Enfermedad de Chagas congénita, su epidemiología y manejo. Montevideo, Uruguay. 24 y 25 Junio OPS/DPC/CD/301/04. Available at: http://www.mex.ops-oms.org/documentos/chagas/dch-chagas-congenita-2004.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  5. Riera C, Guarro A, El Kassab H, Jorba JM, Castro M, Angrill R, Gállego M, Fisa R, Martín C, Lobato A, Portús M, , 2006. Congenital transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi in Europe (Spain): a case report. Am J Trop Med Hyg 75: 10781081. [Google Scholar]
  6. Muñoz J, Portús M, Corachan M, Fumadó V, Gascon J, , 2007. Congenital Trypanosoma cruzi in a non-endemic area. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 11: 11611162.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  7. Flores-Chávez M, Faez Y, Olalla JM, Cruz I, Gárate T, Rodríguez M, Blanc P, Cañavate C, , 2008. Fatal congenital Chagas' disease in a non-endemic area: a case report. BioMed Central. Available at: http//www.casesjournal.com/content/I/I/302. Accessed January 2010. [Google Scholar]
  8. Jackson I, Myers C, Diana A, Marti HP, Wolff H, Chappuis F, Loutan L, Gervaix A, , 2009. Congenital transmission of Chagas disease in Latin American immigrants in Switzerland. Emerg Infect Dis 5: 601603.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  9. Yadon ZE, Schmunis GA, , 2009. Congenital Chagas disease: estimating the potential risk in the United States. Am J Trop Med Hyg 81: 927933.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  10. Freilij H, Altcheh J, Storino R, Storino R, Milei J, , 1994. Chagas Congénito en Enfermedad de Chagas. , eds. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Mosby-Doyma, 267278. [Google Scholar]
  11. Martín García M, De Rissio AM, Ruiz AM, , 2007. Estudio epidemiológico y diagnóstico de la infección por Trypanosoma cruzi en mujeres embarazadas del Centro Nacional de Referencia Instituto Nacional de Parasitología “Dr. Mario Fatala Chaben.” Archivos Argentinos de Epidemiología 10: 4551. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cura EN, Segura EL, , 1998. Quality assurance of the serologic diagnosis of Chagas disease. Pan American J Publ Health 3: 242248.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  13. Alvarez M, Cerisola JA, Rohwedder RW, , 1968. Inmunofluorescence test in the diagnosis of Chagas' diseases. Bol Chil Parasitol 23: 48. [Google Scholar]
  14. Cura EN, Ruiz AM, Velázquez E, Malagrino N, Örn A, Segura EL, 1993. Estandarización de un kit de confirmación (Fatala Kit) para el immunodiagnóstico para infección para Trypanosoma cruzi . Medicina (B Aires) 53 (Suppl 1): 82. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ruiz AM, Segura EL, , 2000. Investigación biotecnológica en la enfermedad de Chagas y su aplicación al control de la transmisión. 1er Congreso Virtual de Cardiología. Available at: http//www.fac.org.ar/cvirtual/cvirtesp/cientesp/ecesp/ecc4520c/cruiz/cruiz.htm. Accessed August 2009. [Google Scholar]
  16. Cerisola JA, Rohwedder RW, Segura EL, Del Prado CE, de Martini GJW, , 1974. El Xenodiagnóstico. Normalización. Utilidad. Premio Lab. Ciba-Geigy. Buenos Aires: Secretaría Estado Salud Pública. [Google Scholar]
  17. Russomando G, Almiron M, Candia N, Franco L, Sanchez Z, de Guillen I, , 2005. Implementation and evaluation of a locally sustainable system of prenatal diagnosis to detect cases of congenital Chagas disease in endemic areas of Paraguay. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 38 (Suppl 2): 4954. [Google Scholar]
  18. Figueiró Filo EA, de Almeida Senefonte FR, Antunes López AH, Oliveira de Morais A, Gonçalvez Souza Júnior V, Lemos Maia T, Duarte G, , 2007. Frecuency of HIV-1, rubella, syphilis, toxoplasmosis, cytomegalovirus, simple herpes virus, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, Chagas disease and HTLV I/II infections in pregnant women in the State of Mato Grosso Do Sul. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 40: 181187.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lorca MH, Bahamonde MI, García A, Tassara R, Urarte E, Contreras Mdel C, Salinas P, Núñez E, , 2005. Trypanosoma cruzi transplacental infection in Chile: diagnosis, treatment and control. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 38 (Suppl 2): 4648. [Google Scholar]
  20. Salas NA, Cot M, Schneider D, Mendoza B, Santalla JA, Postigo J, Chippaux JP, Brutus L, , 2007. Risk factors and consequences of congenital Chagas disease in Yacuiba, south Bolivia. Trop Med Int Health 12: 14981505.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  21. Brutus L, Schneider D, Postigo J, Romero M, Santalla J, Chippaux JP, , 2008. Congenital Chagas disease: diagnostic and clinical aspects in an area without vectorial transmission, Bermejo, Bolivia. Acta Trop 106: 195199.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  22. Blanco SB, Segura EL, Cura EN, Chuit R, Tulián L, Flores I, Garbarino G, Villalonga JF, Gürtler R, , 2000. Congenital transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi: an operational outline for detecting and treating infected infants in north-western Argentina. Trop Med Int Health 5: 293301.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  23. Contreras S, Fernandez MR, Agüero F, Desse Desse J, Orduna T, Martino O, , 1999. Congenital Chagas-Mazza disease in Salta, Argentina. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 32: 633636.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zaidenberg M, , 2005. La enfermedad de Chagas congénita en la Provincia de Salta, Argentina, años 1980–1997. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 32 (Suppl 2): 689695. [Google Scholar]
  25. Streiger M, Fabbro D, del Barco M, Beltramino R, Bovero N, , 1995. Congenital Chagas disease in Santa Fe, diagnosis and treatment. Medicina (B Aires) 55: 125132. [Google Scholar]
  26. Moya P, Basso B, Moretti E, , 2005. Congenital Chagas disease in Córdoba, Argentina: epidemiological, clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic aspects. Experience of 30 years of follow up. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 38 (Suppl 2): 3340. [Google Scholar]
  27. Altcheh J, Biancard M, Lapeña A, Ballering G, Freilij H, , 2005. Congenital Chagas disease: experience in the Hospital de Niños Ricardo Gutiérrez, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 38 (Suppl 2): 4145. [Google Scholar]
  28. Schenone H, Gaggero M, Sapunar J, Contreras Md C, Rojas A, , 2001. Congenital Chagas disease of second generation in Santiago, Chile. Report of two cases. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 43: 231232.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sanchez Negrete O, Mora MC, Basombrío MA, , 2005. High prevalence of congenital Trypanosoma cruzi infection and family clustering in Salta, Argentina. Pediatrics 115: 668672.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  30. Luquetti A, Ferreira AW, Oliveira RA, Tavares SBL, Rassi A, Pinto Dias JC, Prata A, , 2005. Congenital transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi in Brasil: estimation of prevalence based on preliminary data of national serological surveys in children under 5 years old. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 38 (Suppl 2): 2426. [Google Scholar]
  31. Rassi A, Amado Neto V, Rassi GG, Sabagga Amato V, Rassi Júnior A, Luquetti A, Rassi SG, , 2004. A retrospective search for maternal transmission of Chagas infection from patients in the chronic phase. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 37: 485489.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lorca M, García A, Contreras M, Schenome H, Rojas A, , 2001. Evaluation of a Triatoma infestans elimination program by the decrease of Trypanosoma cruzi infection frequency in children younger than 10 years, Chile, 1991–1998. Am J Trop Med Hyg 6: 861864. [Google Scholar]
  33. Torrico F, Alonso-Vega C, Suarez E, Rodriguez P, Torrico MC, Dramaix M, Truyens C, Carlier I, , 2004. Maternal Trypanosoma cruzi infection, pregnancy outcome, morbidity and mortality of congenitally infected and non-infected newborns in Bolivia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 70: 201209. [Google Scholar]
  34. Sosa-Estani S, Dri L, Touris C, Abalde S, Dell'Arcipreste A, Braunstein J, , 2009. Transmisión vectorial y congénita del Trypanosoma cruzi en Las Lomitas, Formosa. Medicina (B Aires) 69: 424430. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gürtler R, Segura EL, Cohen JL, , 2003. Congenital transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in Argentina. Emerg Infect Dis 9: 2932.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  36. Virreira M, Torrico F, Truyens C, Alonso-Vega C, Solano M, Carlier I, Svoboda M, , 2003. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction methods for reliable and easy detection of congenital Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg 68: 574582. [Google Scholar]
  37. Diez CN, Manattini S, Zanuttini JC, Botasso JC, Marcipar I, , 2008. The value of molecular studies for the diagnosis of congenital Chagas disease in northeastern Argentina. Am J Trop Med Hyg 78: 624627. [Google Scholar]
  38. Russomando G, Figueredo A, Almiron M, Sakamoto M, Morita K, , 1992. Polymerase chain reaction-based detection of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA in serum. J Clin Microbiol 30: 28642868. [Google Scholar]
  39. Freilij H, Müller L, Gonzalez Cappa SM, , 1983. Direct micromethod for diagnosis of acute and congenital Chagas disease. J Clin Microbiol 18: 327330. [Google Scholar]
  40. De Rissio AM, Scollo K, Cardoni RL, , 2009. La transmisión madre-hijo del Trypanosoma cruzi en la Argentina. Medicina (B Aires) 69: 529535. [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2010.08-0383
Loading
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2010.08-0383
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Erratum

  • Received : 31 Aug 2008
  • Accepted : 20 Jan 2010

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error