Volume 80, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645


The 2005 dengue outbreak in Singapore cumulated in > 14,000 cases and 27 reported dengue deaths. We fit the single-phase Richards model to weekly dengue notification numbers to detect the turning point for the outbreak, which enables us to study the impact of intervention measures relating to the turning point. The results indicate that turning point had most likely occurred in late August or early September, before large-scale intervention measures were implemented. The “initial” reproduction number for the outbreak is estimated to be ~1.89–2.23 (95% confidence interval: 1.15–3.00). One of the lessons learned from the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak is that multiple phases of outbreak were observed in some affected countries when efforts to intensify intervention or to sustain vigilance were compromised. Intensive and continuing efforts in the implementation of control measures are essential in reducing further dengue occurrences during any resurgence of dengue.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Mackenzie JS, Gubler DJ, Petersen LR, 2004. Emerging flaviviruses: the spread and resurgence of Japanese encephalitis, West Nile and dengue viruses. Nat Med 10 : S98–S109.
  2. World Health Organization, Dengue and Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever, 2002. Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/fact-sheets/fs117/en/. Accessed October 11, 2007.
  3. Ministry of Health, Singapore. Report on Communicable Diseases Surveillance in Singapore 2005. Available at: http://www.moh.gov.sg/mohcorp/uploadedfiles/Publications/Reports/2006/Vector_Borne_Diseases.pdf. Accessed October 12, 2007.
  4. Ministry of Health, Singapore. Report on Communicable Diseases Surveillance in Singapore 2004. Available at: http://www.moh.gov.sg/mohcorp/uploadedfiles/Publications/Reports/2005/Vector-Borne_Diseases.pdf. Accessed October 12, 2007.
  5. Ooi EE, Goh KT, Gubler DJ, 2006. Dengue prevention and 35 years of vector control in Singapore. Emerg Infect Dis 12 : 887–893.
  6. Ang LW, Foong BH, Ye T, Chow A, Chew SK, 2007. Impact of “Carpet-combing” vector control operations in terminating the 2005 dengue outbreak in Singapore. Epidemiol News Bull 33 : 31–36.
  7. Burattini MN, Chen M, Chow A, Coutinho FAB, Goh KT, Lopez LF, Ma S, Massad E, 2007. Modelling the control strategies against dengue in Singapore. Epidemiol Infect 31 : 1–11.
  8. Zhou G, Yan G, 2003. Severe acute respiratory syndrome epidemic in Asia. Emerg Infect Dis 9 : 1608–1610.
  9. Richards FJ, 1959. A flexible growth function for empirical use. J Exp Bot 10 : 290–300.
  10. Hsieh YH, Lee JY, Chang HL, 2004. SARS epidemiology. Emerg Infect Dis 10 : 1165–1167.
  11. Hsieh YH, Cheng YS, 2006. Real-time forecast of multi-wave epidemic outbreaks. Emerg Infect Dis 12 : 122–127.
  12. Hsieh YH, 2008. Richards model: a simple procedure for real-time prediction of outbreak severity. Ma Z, Wu J, Zhou Y, eds. Modeling and Dynamics of Infectious Diseases. Series in Contemporary Applied Mathematics (CAM). Volume 11, 218–239. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
  13. Verhulst PF, 1838. Notice sur la loi que la population pursuit dans son accroissement. Correspond Math Physique 10 : 113–121.
  14. Boyce WE, DiPrima RC, 2005. Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems. Eighth Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  15. Ministry of Health of Singapore, 2006. Communicable Diseases Surveillance in Singapore 2005. Available at: http://www.moh.gov.sg/mohcorp/publicationsreports.aspx?id=15272. Accessed December 14, 2007.
  16. Smith DL, McKenzie FE, Snow RW, Hay SI, 2007. Revisiting the basic reproductive number for malaria and its implications for malaria control. PLoS Biol 5 : 531–542.
  17. Bailey NTJ, 1982. The Biomathematics of Malaria. London: Griffin.
  18. Diekmann O, Heesterbeek JAP, Metz JAJ, 1990. On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio R0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations. J Math Biol 28 : 365–382.
  19. US CDC Division of Vector-borne Infectious Diseases, Dengue: Clinical and Public Health Aspects. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/dengue/slideset/set1/i/slide04.htm. Accessed December 25, 2007.
  20. Massad E, Coutinho FA, Burattini MN, Lopez LF, 2001. The risk of yellow fever in a dengue-infested area. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 95 : 370–374.
  21. Halstead SB, 1990. Dengue. Warren KS, Mahmoud AAF, eds. Tropical and Geographical Medicine. New York: McGraw-Hill, 675–684.
  22. Mediacorp ChannelNewsAsia. NEA to Recruit More Field Inspectors to Fight Rising Dengue Cases. Available at: http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/164775/1/.html. Accessed April 10, 2008.
  23. Svoboda T, Henry B, Shulman L, Kennedy E, Rea E, Ng W, Wallington T, Yaffe B, Gournis E, Vicencio E, Basrur S, Glazier RD, 2004. Public health measures to control the spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome during the outbreak in Toronto. N Engl J Med 350 : 2352–2361.
  24. Goh KT, Cutter J, Heng BH, Ma S, Koh BK, Kwok C, Toh CM, Chew SK, 2006. Epidemiology and control of SARS in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore 35 : 301–316.
  25. Chowell G, Sanchez F, 2006. Climate-based descriptive model of dengue fever: the 2002 epidemic in Colima, Mexico. J Environ Health 68 : 40–44.
  26. Egger JR, Ooi EE, Kelly DW, Woolhouse ME, Davies CR, Coleman PG, 2008. Reconstructing historical changes in the force of infection of dengue fever in Singapore: implications for surveillance and control. Bull WHO 86 : 161–240.
  27. Koopman JS, Prevots DR, Mann MAV, Dantes HG, Zarate Aquino ML, Longini IM, Amor J, 1991. Determinants and predictors of dengue infection in Mexico. Am J Epidemiol 133 : 1168–1178.
  28. Marques C, Forattini O, Massad E, 1994. The basic reproduction number for dengue fever in Sao Paulo state, Brazil: 1990–1991 epidemic. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 88 : 88–89.
  29. Dietz K, Heesterbeek JAP, 2002. Daniel Bernoulli’s epidemiological model revisited. Math Biosci 180 : 1–21.
  30. Khoa TDT, Tran QB, Phan TG, Hoang LP, Le QH, Nguyen VN, Tran TN, Groen J, Nagelkerke N, de Vries PJ, 2005. Seroprevalence of dengue antibodies, annual incidence and risk factors among children in southern Vietnam. Trop Med Int Health 10 : 379–386.
  31. Chowell G, Diaz-Dueñas P, Miller JC, Alcazar-Velazco A, Hyman JM, Fenimore PW, Castillo-Chavez C, 2007. Estimation of the reproduction number of dengue fever from spatial epidemic data. Math Biosci 208 : 571–589.
  32. Luz PM, Codeço CT, Massad E, Struchiner CJ, 2003. Uncertainties regarding dengue modeling in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 98 : 871–878.
  33. Favier C, Degallier N, Rosa-Freitas MG, Boulanger JP, Costa Lima JR, Luitgards-Moura JF, Menkès CE, Mondet B, Oliveira C, Weimann ET, Tsouris P, 2006. Early determination of the reproductive number for vector-borne diseases: the case of dengue in Brazil. Trop Med Int Health 11 : 332–340.
  34. Ferguson NM, Donnelly CA, Anderson RM, 1999. Transmission dynamics and epidemiology of dengue: insights from age-stratified sero-prevalence surveys. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 354 : 757–768.
  35. Massad E, Ma S, Burattini MN, Tun Y, Coutinho FAB, Ang LW, 2008. The risk of chikungunya fever in a dengue endemic area. J Travel Med 15 : 147–155.
  36. Wilder-Smith A, Foo W, Earnest A, Sremulanathan S, Paton NI, 2004. Seroepidemiology of dengue in the adult population of Singapore. Trop Med Int Health 9 : 305–308.
  37. Nishiura H, 2006. Mathematical and statistical analyses of the spread of dengue. Dengue Bull 30 : 51–67.
  38. Nagao Y, Koelle K, 2008. Decreases in dengue transmission may act to increase the incidence of dengue hemorrhagic fever. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105 : 2238–2243.

Data & Media loading...

  • Received : 09 May 2008
  • Accepted : 18 Sep 2008

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error