Volume 76, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645


Xenomonitoring (detection of filarial larvae or their DNA in mosquitoes) is a sensitive marker for assessing the endemicity of filariasis and a useful tool for evaluating elimination programs. To examine the fate of microfilariae (mf) and filarial DNA in vector competent and non-competent mosquito strains, we compared the detection of parasites by dissection and by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in three different mosquito strains. We conclude that PCR is much more sensitive than dissection for detecting filarial larvae, especially their remnants in mosquitoes. However, parasite DNA can be detected in both vector and non-vector mosquitoes for two weeks or longer after they ingest mf-positive blood. Thus, although xenomonitoring with vector and non-vector mosquito species may be a sensitive method for indirectly detecting filarial parasites in human populations, positive test results for parasite DNA in mosquitoes do not necessarily prove that transmission is ongoing in the study area.


Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Ottesen EA, 2006. Lymphatic filariasis: treatment, control and elimination. Adv Parasitol 61 : 395–441. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bockarie MJ, Fischer P, Williams SA, Zimmerman PA, Griffin L, Alpers MP, Kazura JW, 2000. Application of a polymerase chain reaction-ELISA to detect Wuchereria bancrofti in pools of wild-caught Anopheles punctulatus in a filariasis control area in Papua New Guinea. Am J Trop Med Hyg 62 : 363–367. [Google Scholar]
  3. Fischer P, Wibowo H, Pischke S, Ruckert P, Liebau E, Ismid IS, Supali T, 2002. PCR-based detection and identification of the filarial parasite Brugia timori from Alor Island, Indonesia. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 96 : 809–821. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rao RU, Atkinson LJ, Ramzy RM, Helmy H, Farid HA, Bockarie MJ, Susapu M, Laney SJ, Williams SA, Weil GJ, 2006. A real-time PCR-based assay for detection of Wuchereria bancrofti DNA in blood and mosquitoes. Am J Trop Med Hyg 74 : 826–832. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ramzy RM, El Setouhy M, Helmy H, Ahmed ES, Abd Elaziz KM, Farid HA, Shannon WD, Weil GJ, 2006. Effect of yearly mass drug administration with diethylcarbamazine and albendazole on bancroftian filariasis in Egypt: a comprehensive assessment. Lancet 367 : 992–999. [Google Scholar]
  6. Albuquerque CM, Cavalcanti VM, Melo MA, Vercosa P, Regis LN, Hurd H, 1999. Bloodmeal microfilariae density and the uptake and establishment of Wuchereria bancrofti infections in Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes aegypti. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 94 : 591–596. [Google Scholar]
  7. Farid HA, Hammad RE, Hassan MM, Ramzy RM, El Setouhy M, Weil GJ, 2005. Effects of combined diethylcarbamazine and albendazole treatment of bancroftian filariasis on parasite uptake and development in Culex pipiens L. Am J Trop Med Hyg 73 : 108–114. [Google Scholar]
  8. Farid HA, Hammad RE, Soliman DA, El Setouhy MA, Ramzy RM, Weil GJ, 2003. Relationships between Wuchereria bancrofti microfilaria counts in human blood and parasite uptake and maturation in Culex pipiens, with observations on the effects of diethylcarbamazine treatment on these parameters. Am J Trop Med Hyg 68 : 286–293. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gad AM, Hammad RE, Farid HA, 1996. Uptake and development of Wuchereria bancrofti in Culex pipiens L. and Aedes caspius Pallas. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 26 : 305–314. [Google Scholar]
  10. Christensen BM, Sutherland DR, 1984. Brugia pahangi: exsheathment and midgut penetration in Aedes aegypti. Trans Am Microsc Soc 103 : 423–433. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bartholomay LC, Farid HA, Ramzy RM, Christensen BM, 2003. Culex pipiens pipiens: characterization of immune peptides and the influence of immune activation on development of Wuchereria bancrofti. Mol Biochem Parasitol 130 : 43–50. [Google Scholar]
  12. Rutledge LC, Ward RA, Gould DJ, 1964. Studies on the feeding response of mosquitoes to nutritive solutions in a new membrane feeder. Mosq News 24 : 407–419. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hayes RO, 1953. Determination of a physiological solution for Aedes aegypti (L.). J Econ Entomol 46 : 624–627. [Google Scholar]
  14. Rao RU, Weil GJ, Fischer K, Supali T, Fischer P, 2006. Detection of Brugia parasite DNA in human blood samples by real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol 44 : 3887–3893. [Google Scholar]
  15. Katholi CR, Unnasch TR, 2006. Important experimental parameters for determining infection rates in arthropod vectors using pool screening approaches. Am J Trop Med Hyg 74 : 779–785. [Google Scholar]
  16. World Health Organization, 1992. Lymphatic filariasis: the disease and its control. Fifth report of the WHO Expert Committee on Filariasis. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 821 : 1–71. [Google Scholar]
  17. Christensen BM, Sutherland DR, Gleason LN, 1984. Defense reactions of mosquitoes to filarial worms: comparative studies on the response of three different mosquitoes to inoculated Brugia pahangi and Dirofilaria immitis microfilariae. J Invertebr Pathol 44 : 267–274. [Google Scholar]
  18. Mukabana WR, Takken W, Knols BG, 2002. Analysis of arthropod bloodmeals using molecular genetic markers. Trends Parasitol 18 : 505–509. [Google Scholar]
  19. Goodman DS, Orelus JN, Roberts JM, Lammie PJ, Streit TG, 2003. PCR and mosquito dissection as tools to monitor filarial infection levels following mass treatment. Filaria J 2 : 11. [Google Scholar]
  20. Plichart C, Sechan Y, Davies N, Legrand AM, 2006. PCR and dissection as tools to monitor filarial infection of Aedes polynesiensis mosquitoes in French Polynesia. Filaria J 5 : 2. [Google Scholar]
  21. Williams SA, Laney SJ, Bierwert LA, Saunders LJ, Boakye DA, Fischer P, Goodman D, Helmy H, Hoti SL, Vasuki V, Lammie PJ, Plichart C, Ramzy RM, Ottesen EA, 2002. Development and standardization of a rapid, PCR-based method for the detection of Wuchereria bancrofti in mosquitoes, for xenomonitoring the human prevalence of bancroftian filariasis. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 96 (Suppl 2): S41–S46. [Google Scholar]
  22. Rodriguez-Perez MA, Katholi CR, Hassan HK, Unnasch TR, 2006. Large-scale entomologic assessment of Onchocerca volvulus transmission by poolscreen PCR in Mexico. Am J Trop Med Hyg 74 : 1026–1033. [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Received : 12 Sep 2006
  • Accepted : 22 Nov 2006

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error