Volume 75, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645


This study evaluated bovine tuberculosis in Mejia canton, a major dairy cattle production region in Ecuador. Randomly selected cattle (1,012 from 59 farms) classified according to herd size were tested by the single tuberculin test (STT). Sixty days later, positive reactors were tested again by the comparative tuberculin test (CTT). In addition, tissue samples from two STT-CTT-positive reactors detected on a farm were obtained in a local slaughterhouse and analyzed bacteriologically. A total of 4.24% of the cattle were positive in the STT and 3.85% were positive in the CTT, with the highest number (7.95%) in large herds versus 3.4% in medium herds and 0.3% in small herds. was isolated from mesenteric lymph nodes and lungs of one animal. A 16S ribosomal RNA-based polymerase chain reaction confirmed culture results and differentiated mycobacteria other than . This study confirms the zoonotic importance of tuberculosis in Ecuadorian dairy cattle with herd size likely to be a crucial parameter in the prevalence of the disease. The implementation of a national control program is necessary and should be based on the detection of positive cattle by STT in combination with CTT.


Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Acha P, Szyfres B, 2001. Zoonoses and Communicable Diseases Common to Man and Animals. Bacterioses and Mycoses. Third edition. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization. Scientific and Technical Publication No. 580, 283–299.
  2. Phillips CJ, Foster CR, Morris PA, Teverson R, 2003. The transmission of Mycobacterium bovis infection to cattle. Res Vet Sci 74 : 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Suazo FM, Escalera AM, Torres RM, 2003. A review of M. bovis BCG protection against TB in cattle and other animal species. Prev Vet Med 58 : 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Krauss H, Weber A, Appel M, Enders B, Isenberg HD, Schiefer HG, Slenczka W, von Graevenitz A, Zahner H, 2003. Zoonoses Infectious Diseases Transmissible from Animals to Humans. Third edition. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology Press, 210–216.
  5. Freire F, Aguilar E, Cobo J, Vásconez M, 2001. Casos, Tasas y Tendencias de la Tuberculosis en el Ecuador entre 1992–2001. Programa Nacional de Control de la Tuberculosis. Quito: Ecuador, Ministerio de Salud Pública.
  6. Cosivi O, Grange JM, Daborn CJ, Raviglione MC, Fujikura T, Cousins D, Robinson RA, Huchzermeyer HF, de Knator I, Meslin FX, 1998. Zoonotic tuberculosis due to Mycobacterium bovis in developing countries. Emerg Infect Dis 4 : 59–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. OIE, 2000. Bovine tuberculosis. Manual of Standards for Diagnosis Tests and Vaccines. Geneva: World Health Organization. Avaiable from http://www.oie.int/eng/normes/mmanual/A_00050.htm
  8. Shakespeare M, 2002. Zoonoses. London: Pharmaceutical Press, 98–101.
  9. Portaels F, Agular J, Fissette K, Fonteyne PE, de Beenhouwer H, de Rijk P, Guedenon A, Lemans R, Steunou C, Zinsou C, Dumonceau JM, Meyers WM, 1997. Direct detection and identification of Mycobacterium ulcerans in clinical specimens by PCR and oligonucleotide-specific capture plate hybridization. J Clin Microbiol 35 : 1097–1100.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Portaels F, Johnson RC, Meyers WM, 2001. Buruli Ulcer. Diagnosis of Mycobacterium ulcerans. A Manual for Health Care Providers. Geneva: World Health Organization. WHO/CDS/GBUI/2001.
  11. Parks LC, 1997. Microbiological Media. Second edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 774–776.
  12. Lévy-Frébault V, Portaels F, 1992. Proposed minimal standards for the genus Mycobacterium and for description of new slowly growing Mycobacterium species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 42 : 315–323.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Portaels F, Realini L, Bauwens L, Hirschel B, Meyers WM, de Meurichy W, 1996. Mycobacteriosis caused by Mycobacterium genavense in birds kept in a zoo: 11-year survey. J Clin Microbiol 34 : 319–323.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Boddinghaus B, Rogall T, Flohr T, Blocker H, Bottger EC, 1990. Detection and identification of mycobacteria by amplification of rRNA. J Clin Microbiol 28 : 1751–1759.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gil A, Samartino L, 2001. Zoonosis en los Sistemas de Producción Animal de las Áreas Urbanas y Periurbanas de América Latina. Livestock Policy Discussion Paper No. 2. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization, 16–22.
  16. Adams LG, 2001. In vivo and in vitro diagnosis of Mycobacterium bovis infection. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epizoot 20 : 304–324.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Biberstein EL, Hirsh DC, 1999. Mycobacterium species: the agents of animal tuberculosis. Hirsh DC, Zee YC, ed. Veterinary Microbiology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science Press, 158–164.
  18. Grooms D, Molesworth J, 2000. The Comparative Cervical Tuberculin Test. Michigan State University Extension. Bovine TB Notes. Extension Buletin E-2731, New, September. Available from http://cvm.msu.edu/extension/docs/TB/E-2731.pdf
  19. Monaghan ML, Doherty ML, Collins JD, Kazda JF, Quinn PJ, 1994. The tuberculin test. Vet Microbiol 40 : 111–124.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Sreevatsan S, Bookout JB, Ringpis F, Perumaalla VS, Ficht TA, Adams LG, Hagius SD, Elzer PH, Bricker BJ, Kumar GK, Rajasekhar M, Isloor S, Barathur RR, 2000. A multiplex approach to molecular detection of Brucella abortus and/or Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle. J Clin Microbiol 38 : 2602–2610.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Leslie IW, Hebert CN, Burn KL, McClancy BN, Donnelly WJC, 1975. Comparison of the specificity of human and bovine tuberculin PPD for the testing cattle. Vet Rec 96 : 332–341.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Worthington RW, 1967. Mycobacterial sensitins and the non-specific reactor problem. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 34 : 345–438.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Quinn PJ, Carter ME, Markey B, Carter GR, 1999. Clinical Veterinary Microbiology. London: Mosby Press, 156–169.
  24. Latini O, Canal AM, Ferrara ME, Sequeira MD, Sequeira G, Bagnaroli R, Torres P, 1997. Confiabilidad en la determinación de prevalencia de infección por Mycobacterium bovis en ga-nado bovino por decomisos en frigoríficos. Arch Med Vet 29 : 1–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Rigouts L, Maregeya B, Traore H, Collart JP, Fissette K, Portaels F, 1996. Use of DNA restriction fragment typing in the differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates from animals and humans in Burundi. Tuber Lung Dis 77 : 264–268.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Portaels F, Fissette K, De Ridder KM, Macedo P, de Muynck A, Silva MT, 1988. Effects of freezing and thawing on the viability and the ultrastructure of in vivo grown mycobacteria. Int J Lepr 56 : 580–587.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Vitale F, Capra G, Maxia L, Reale S, Vesco G, Caracappa S, 1998. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in cattle by PCR using milk, lymph node aspirates, and nasal swabs. J Clin Microbiol 36 : 1050–1055.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Received : 23 Jun 2005
  • Accepted : 28 Sep 2005

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error