Volume 74, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645


Control of arthropod-borne diseases based on population replacement with genetically modified non-competent vectors has been proposed as a promising alternative to conventional control strategies. Due to likely fitness costs associated with vectors manipulated to carry anti-pathogen effector genes, the effector genes will need to be coupled with a strong drive system to rapidly sweep them into natural populations. Endogenous meiotic drive systems have strong and stable population replacement potential, and have previously been reported in two mosquito species: and . To investigate the influence of an endogenous meiotic drive gene on population dynamics, we established three experimental population types that were initiated with 100%, 10%, and 1% male mosquitoes carrying a strong meiotic driver (T37 strain) and 100% sensitive females (RED strain), respectively. Among the 100% and 10% populations, early generations were highly male biased, which reflected the effects of the meiotic driver, and remained more than 60% male by the F. A genetic marker tightly linked with the meiotic driver on chromosome 1 showed strong selection for the T37 strain-specific allele. Similar but reduced effects of the meiotic driver were also observed in the 1% populations. These results suggest that release of males carrying a strong meiotic driver into drive sensitive populations can be an effective tool for population replacement, and provide a foundation for additional studies including both experimental populations and simulations by mathematical modeling.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Knipling EF, Laven H, Craig GB, Pal R, Kitzmiller JB, Smith CN, Brown AW, 1968. Genetic control of insects of public health importance. Bull World Health Organ 38 : 421–438.
  2. Pal R, 1974. WHO/ICMR programme of genetic control of mosquitoes in India. Pal R, Whitten MJ, eds. The Use of Genetics in Insect Control. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 73–95.
  3. Lorimer N, Lounibos LP, Petersen JL, 1976. Field trials with a translocation homozygote in Aedes aegypti for population replacement. J Econ Entomol 69 : 405–409.
  4. Yasuno M, Mcdonald WW, Curtis CF, Grover KK, Rajagopalan PK, Sharma LS, Sharma VP, Singh D, Singh KRP, Agarwal HV, Kazmi SJ, Menon PKB, Menon R, Razdan RK, Samuel D, Vaidyanathan V, 1978. A control experiment with chemo-sterilized male Culex pipiens fatigans Wied in a village near Delhi surrounded by a breeding-free zone. Jpn J Sanit Zool 29 : 325–343.
  5. Baker RH, Reisen WK, Sakai RK, Hayes CG, Aslamkhan M, Saifuddin UT, Mahmood F, Perveen A, Javed S, 1979. Field assessment of mating competitiveness of male Culex tritaenio-rhynchus carrying a complex chromosomal aberration. Ann Entomol Soc Am 72 : 751–758.
  6. Asman SM, McDonald PT, Prout T, 1981. Field studies of genetic control systems for mosquitoes. Annu Rev Entomol 26 : 289–318.
  7. Curtis CF, 1985. Genetic control of insect pests: growth industry or lead balloon? Biol J Linn Soc 26 : 359–374.
  8. Robinson AS, Franz G, Atkinson PW, 2004. Insect transgenesis and its potential role in agriculture and human health. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 34 : 113–120.
  9. Curtis CF, Graves PM, 1988. Methods for replacement of malaria vector populations. J Trop Med Hyg 91 : 43–48.
  10. Morris AC, Eggleston P, Crampton JM, 1989. Genetic transformation of the mosquito Aedes aegypti by micro-injection of DNA. Med Vet Entomol 3 : 1–7.
  11. Alphey L, Ben BC, Billingsley P, Coetzee M, Crisanti A, Curtis C, Eggleston P, Godfray C, Hemingway J, Jacobs-Lorena M, James AA, Kafatos FC, Mukwaya LG, Paton M, Powell JR, Schneider W, Scott TW, Sina B, Sinden R, Sinkin S, Spielman A, Touré Y, Collins FH, 2002. Malaria control with genetically manipulated insect vectors. Science 298 : 119–121.
  12. Catteruccia F, Godfray HCJ, Crisanti A, 2003. Impact of genetic manipulation on the fitness of Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes. Science 299 : 1225–1227.
  13. Irvin N, Hoddle MS, O’Brochta DA, Carey B, Atkinson PW, 2004. Assessing fitness costs for transgenic Aedes aegypti expressing the GFP marker and transposase genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101 : 891–896.
  14. Moreira LA, Wang J, Collins FH, Jacobs-Lorena M, 2004. Fitness of anopheline mosquitoes expressing transgenes that inhibit Plasmodium development. Genetics 166 : 1337–1341.
  15. James AA, 2005. Gene drive systems in mosquitoes: rules of the road. Trends Parasitol 21 : 64–67.
  16. Sandler L, Novitski E, 1957. Meiotic drive as an evolutionary force. Am Nat 91 : 105–110.
  17. Lyttle TW, 1993. Cheater sometimes prosper: distortion of men-delian segregation by meiotic drive. Trends Genet 9 : 205–210.
  18. Crow JF, 1999. Unmasking a cheating gene. Science 283 : 1651–1652.
  19. Palopoli MF, Wu CI, 1996. Rapid evolution of a coadapted gene complex: evidence from the segregation distorter (SD) system of meiotic drive in Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics 143 : 1675–1688.
  20. Craig GB, Hickey WA, VandeHey RC, 1960. An inherited male-producing factor in Aedes aegypti.Science 23 : 1887–1889.
  21. Sweeny TL, Barr AR, 1978. Sex ratio distortion caused by meiotic drive in a mosquito, Culex pipiens L. Genetics 88 : 427–446.
  22. Newton ME, Wood RJ, Southern DI, 1978. Cytological mapping of the M and D loci in the mosquito, Aedes aegypti (L.). Genetica 48 : 137–143.
  23. Hickey WA, Craig GB, 1966. Distortion of sex ratio in populations of Aedes aegypti.Can J Genet Cytol 8 : 260–278.
  24. Wood RJ, Ouda NA, 1987. The genetic basis of resistance and sensitivity to the meiotic drive gene D in the mosquito Aedes aegypti L. Genetica 72 : 69–79.
  25. Wood RJ, Cook LM, Hamilton A, Whitelaw A, 1977. Transporting the marker gene re (red eye) into a laboratory cage population of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae), using meiotic drive at the M D locus. J Med Entomol 14 : 461–464.
  26. Curtis CF, Grover KK, Suguna SG, Uppal DK, Dietz K, Agarwal HV, Kazmi SJ, 1976. Comparative field cage tests of the population suppressing efficiency of three genetic control systems for Aedes aegypti.Heredity 36 : 11–29.
  27. Suguna SG, Kazami SJ, Curtis CF, 1977. Sex-ratio distorter translocation homozygotes in Aedes aegypti.Genetica 47 : 125–133.
  28. Mori A, Chadee DD, Graham DH, Severson DW, 2004. Reinvestigation of an endogenous meiotic drive system in the mosquito, Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol 41 : 1027–1033.
  29. Hickey WA, Craig GB, 1966a. Genetic distortion of sex ratio in a mosquito Aedes aegypti.Genetics 53 : 1177–1196.
  30. Severson DW, Meece JK, Lovin DD, Saha G, Morlais I, 2002. Linkage map organization of expressed sequence tags and sequence tagged sites in the mosquito, Aedes aegypti.Insect Mol Biol 11 : 371–378.
  31. Severson DW, 1997. RFLP analysis of insect genomes. Crampton JM, Beard CB, Louis C, eds. The Molecular Biology of Insect Disease Vectors: A Methods Manual. London: Chapman and Hall, 309–320.
  32. Wood RJ, Newton ME, 1991. Sex-ratio distortion caused by meiotic drive in mosquitoes. Am Nat 137 : 379–391.
  33. Wood RJ, 1976. Between-family variation in sex ratio in the Trinidad (T-30) strain of Aedes aegypti (L.) indicating differences in sensitivity to the meiotic drive gene M D .Genetica 46 : 345–361.
  34. Kusano A, Staber C, Ganetzky B, 2002. Segregation distortion induced by wild-type RanGAP in Drosophila.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99 : 6866–6870.
  35. Merrill C, Bayraktaroglu L, Kusano A, Ganetzky B, 1999. Truncated RanGAP encoded by the Segregation Distorter locus of Drosophila.Science 283 : 1742–1745.
  36. Sazer S, Dasso M, 2000. The Ran decathlon: multiple roles of Ran. J Cell Sci 113 : 1111–1118.

Data & Media loading...

  • Received : 03 Jun 2005
  • Accepted : 25 Aug 2005

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error