1921
Volume 74, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645

Abstract

School children were used as indicators for the identification of schistosomiasis-positive family members in a area of low endemicity. This study was designed to improve current schistosomiasis control programs by applying this strategy to identify schistosomiasis-positive individuals in a more efficient way. The initial prevalence among school children was 8.6%. However, the prevalence among the family members of these school children increased to 15.5%. In contrast to these findings the prevalence in family members of schistosomiasis-negative school children was 3.8%. Although the applied methodology showed a relatively low sensitivity (50.0%), the high negative predictive value (87.7%) indicates that a few positive family members of school children with a negative stool result will be missed. This shows that this method of evaluation could be a strategy for a more efficient and cheaper identification of schistosomiasis-positive individuals in areas of low endemicity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2006.74.495
2006-03-01
2017-09-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/14761645/74/3/0740495.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2006.74.495&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Engels D, Chitsulo L, Montresor A, Savioli L, 2002. The global epidemiological situation of schistosomiasis and new approaches to control and research. Acta Trop 82 : 139–146.
  2. Lambertucci JR, Serufo JC, Gerspacher-Lara R, Rayes AAM, Teixeira R, Nobre V, Antunes CMF, 2000. Schistosoma mansoni: assessment of morbidity before and after control. Acta Trop 77 : 101–109.
  3. Katz N, 1998. Schistosomiasis control in Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 93 (Suppl 1): 33–35.
  4. Montresor A, Crompton DWT, Gyorkos TW, Savioli L, 2002. Helminth Control in School-Age Children: A Guide for Managers for Control Programmes. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  5. Guyatt HL, Brooker S, Donnelly CA, 1999. Can prevalence of infection in school-age children be used as an index for assessing community prevalence? Parasitology 118 : 257–268.
  6. Cairncross S, Blumenthal U, Kolsky P, Maores L, Tayeh A, 1996. The public and domestic domains in the transmission of disease. Trop Med Int Health 1 : 27–34.
  7. Watts S, Khallaayoune K, Bensefia R, Laamrani H, Gryseels B, 1998. The study of human behaviour and schistosomiasis transmission in an irrigated area in Moroco. Soc Sci Med 46 : 755–765.
  8. Katz N, Chaves A, Pellegrino J, 1972. A simple device for quantitative stool thick-smear technique schistosomiasis mansoni. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 14 : 397–400.
  9. Dean AG, Dean JA, Burton AH, Dicker RC, 1990. EPI-INFO, Version 6.04: A Word Processing Database and Statistics Program for Epidemiology on Microcomputers. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
  10. Massara CL, Peixoto SV, Barros HS, Enk MJ, Carvalho OS, Schall VT, 2004. Factors associated with schistosomiasis mansoni in a population from the municipality of Jaboticatubas, State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 99 (Suppl 1): 127–134.
  11. Rodrigues LC, Wheeler JG, Shier R, Guerra HL, Pimenta F Jr, Lima e Costa MF, 2000. Predicting the community prevalence of schistosomiasis mansoni from the prevalence among 7- to 14-year-olds. Parasitology 121 : 507–512.
  12. Massara CL, Schall VT, 2004. A pedagogical approach of schistosomiasis—an experience in health education in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 99 (Suppl 1): 113–119.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2006.74.495
Loading
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2006.74.495
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Received : 22 Mar 2005
  • Accepted : 17 Jun 2005

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error