Volume 73, Issue 5
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645


Chagas disease is a parasitic disease in Latin America. Despite vector control programs that have reduced incidence by 70%, there are at least 12–14 million prevalent cases. We used a Markov model to examine strategies for control and treatment of Chagas disease that compared annual costs, life expectancies, and cost-effectiveness of three vector control and drug treatment strategies. Vector control programs alone and vector control plus drug treatment are dominant over no vector control (i.e., less costly and save more lives), and vector control plus drug is highly cost-effective compared with vector control alone. We demonstrated expected changes in deaths over time resulting from various prevention approaches. Vector control affects primarily incidence, not decreasing deaths and prevalence for 30 years, while drug treatment affects prevalence and deaths immediately. The best strategy to combat Chagas disease is combinations of vector control and a potential new drug.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Moncayo A, 2003. Chagas disease: current epidemiological trends after the interruption of vectoral and transfusional transmission in the Southern Cone countries. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 98 : 577–591.
  2. Torrico F, Alonso-Vega C, Suarez E, Rodriguez P, Torrico MC, Dramaix M, Truyens C, Carlier Y, 2004. Maternal Trypanosoma cruzi infection, pregnancy outcome, morbidity and mortality of congenitally infected and non-infected newborns in Bolivia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 70 : 201–209.
  3. WHO, 1991. Control of Chagas diseases. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 811 : 1–95.
  4. UNDP, World Bank, and WHO, 1991. Special Program for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases. Geneva: World Health Organization. Eleventh Program Report, 67.
  5. Schmunis GA, 1999. Initiativa del Cono Sur. Proceedings of the II International Workshop on Population Genetics and Control of Triatominae. Tegucigalpa, Honduras, 26–31.
  6. Dias JCP, Silveira AC, Schofield CJ, 2002. Impact of Chagas disease control in Latin America: a review. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 97 : 603–612.
  7. Schofield CJ, 2002. Eradication of Triatoma infections: A new regional program for southern Latin America. Ann Soc Belg Med Trop 72 : 69–71.
  8. Murray CHL, Lopez AD, Jaimson DT, 1994. The global burden of disease in 1990: summary results, sensitivity analysis, and future directions. Murray CHL LA, ed. ed. Global Comparative Assessments in the Health Sector: Disease Burden Expenditures and Intervention Packages. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  9. Leiby DA, 2004. Medical and Scientific Updates: Number 99-1: Present Status of Studies on Trypanosoma cruzi in U.S. Blood Donors. Oakland, CA: Holland Laboratory, American Red Cross, 1–5
  10. Rassi A Jr, Rasi SG, Rassi A, 2001. Sudden death in Chagas’ disease. Arq Bras Cardol 76 : 86–96.
  11. Viotti RJ, Vigliano C, Laucella S, Lococo B, Petti M, Bertocchi G, Ruiz Vera B, Armenti H, 2004. Value of echocardiography for diagnosis and prognosis of chronic chagas disease cardiomyopathy without heart failure. Heart 190 : 655–660.
  12. Cubillos-Garzon LA, Cassas JP, Morillo CA, Bautista LE, 2004. Congestive heart failure in Latin America: the next epidemic. Am Heart J 147 : 412–417.
  13. Sales G, Zavier S, Sousa A, Hasslocher-Moreno A, Cardoso C, 2003. Prognostic value of QT interval parameters for mortality risk stratification in Chagas’ disease: results of a long-term follow-up study. Circulation 108 : 305–312.
  14. Meneghelli UG, 1999. Clinical treatment of the digestive form of Chagas disease. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 94 : 341–342.
  15. Ebrahim GJ, 2004. Eradication of American trypanosomiasis (Chagas’ disease): an achievable goal? J Trop Pediatr 50 : 320–321.
  16. Carlier Y, Luquetti AO, 2003. Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis). EMed J 4 : 1–24.
  17. Miles MA, Feliciangeli MD, de Arias AR, 2003. Science medicine and the future: American trypanosomiasis (Chagas’ disease) and the role of molecular epidemiology in guiding control strategies. BMJ 326 : 1444–1448.
  18. Sonnenberg FA, Beck JR, 1993. Markov models in medical decision making: a practical guide. Med Decis Making 13 : 322–338.
  19. WHO Life Tables, 2001. Statistical Yearbook for Latin America and the Caribbean 2000: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  20. Murray CHL, Lopez AD, 1996. Global Health Statistics. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  21. WHO, 2002. Control of Chagas Disease: Second Report of the WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 905 : 1–109.
  22. Chiaki M, 1995. The Cost-Effectiveness of Blood Donor Screening Programs to Identify Transfusion Transmitted Chagas’ Disease in Bolivia. Boston: Bureau of International Cooperation, International Medical Center of Japan, Takemi Program in International Health, Harvard School of Public Health, 1–34.
  23. Espinosa R, Carrasco HA, Belandria F, Fuenmayor AM, Molina C, Gonzalez R, Martinez O, 1985. Life expectancy analysis in patients with Chagas’ disease: prognosis after one decade (1973–1983). Int J Cardiol 8 : 45–56.
  24. Wendel S, Dias JCP, 1992. Transfusion transmitted Chagas disease. Wendel S, Brener Z, Camargo ME, Rassi A, eds. Chagas Disease (American trypanosomiasis): Its Impact on Transfusion and Clinical Medicine. Sao Paulo, Brazil: International Society of Blood Transfusion Brazil ’92, Sociedade Brasileira Hemalologia e Hemoterapia, 103–133.
  25. Netinho JG, Teixeira FV, 2003. Surgical treatment of chagasic megacolon: Duhamel-Haddad procedure is also a good option. Dis Colon Rectum 46 : 1576–1578.
  26. Schlant RC, Hurst JW, 1990. The Heart, Companion Handbook. New York: McGraw Hill.
  27. Kobayasi S, Mendes EF, Rodrigues MA, Franco MF, 1992. Toxic dilatation of the colon in Chagas’ disease. Br J Surg 79 : 1202–1203.
  28. Pinotti HW, Habr-Gama A, Cecconello I, Felix VN, Zilberstein B, 1993. The surgical treatment of megaesophagus and mega-colon. Dig Dis 11 : 206–215.
  29. Sales GB, Chiocca JC, Mazure PA, 1987. Esophageal achalasia: review of the results after 15 years’ experience. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam 17 : 7–13.
  30. Dantas RO, 1998. Dysphagia in patients with Chagas’ disease. Dysphagia 13 : 53–57.
  31. Dantas RO, 2003. Comparison between idiopathic achalasia and achalasia caused by Chagas disease: a review on the publications about the subject. Arq Gastroenterol 40 : 126–130.
  32. Akhavan D, 1996. Analise de Custo-Efetivadade do Programa de Controle da Doenca de Chagas no Brasil. Monographic paper. Brasilia, Brazil: National Health Foundation (Ministry of Health): 44.
  33. Bosombrio MA, Schofield CJ, Rojas CL, del Rey EC, 1998. A cost-benefit analysis of Chagas disease control in northwestern Argentina. Trans R. Soc Trop Med Hyg. 92 : 137–143.
  34. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC, eds., 1996. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press.
  35. United Nations Statistical Division, 2000. National Accounts Main Aggregates-GDP-All Series. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
  36. Evers SM, Struijs JN, Ament AJ, van Genugten ML, Jager JH, van den Bos GA, 2004. International comparison of stroke cost studies. Stroke 35 : 1209–1215.
  37. OPS, 1998. VII Reunion de la Commission Intergubernamental para la Eliminacion de Triatoma infestans y la Interrupcion de la Transmission de la Tripanosomiasis Americana per Transfusionk. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization. Document OPS/HCP/HCT/98.114, 78.
  38. World Bank Group, 2002. Developing Countries, HNP Statistics, HNP Group Data: Latin America and Caribbean. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  39. Castro C, Prata A, Macedo V, 2001. Estudo clinico durante 13 anos de 190 chagasicos cronicos de Mambai, Goias, Brasil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 34 : 309–318.

Data & Media loading...

  • Received : 28 Mar 2005
  • Accepted : 16 Jun 2005

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error