Volume 73, Issue 5
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645


We compared the diagnosis of malaria in 297 patients from Thailand by a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay using the LightCycler with conventional microscopy using Giemsa-stained thick and thin blood films. The PCR assay can be completed in one hour and has the potential to detect and identify four species of in a single reaction by use of melting temperature curve analysis (however, we did not detect in this study). Blood was collected, stored, and transported on IsoCode STIX, which provide a stable matrix for the archiving and rapid simple extraction of DNA. A genus-specific primer set corresponding to the 18S ribosomal RNA was used to amplify the target sequence. Fluorescence resonance energy technology hybridization probes were designed for over a region containing basepair mismatches, which allowed differentiation of the other species. The PCR results correlated with the microscopic results in 282 (95%) of 297 patient specimens. Most of these were single-species infections caused by (150) and (120), along with 5 , 2 mixed infections ( and ), and 5 negative specimens. No negative microscopy specimens were positive by PCR (100% specificity for detection of any The 15 discrepant results could not be resolved, but given the subjective nature of microscopy and the analytical objectivity of the PCR, the PCR results may be correct. The ability of the PCR method to detect mixed infections or to detect could not be determined in this study. Within the limitations of initial equipment costs, this real-time PCR assay is a rapid, accurate, and efficient method for the specific diagnosis of malaria. It may have application in clinical laboratories, as well as in epidemiologic studies and antimalarial efficacy trials.


Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. World Health Organization, 1996. Fact Sheet No. 94. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  2. Stauffer W, Fischer PR, 2003. Diagnosis and treatment of malaria in children. Clin Infect Dis 37 : 1340–1348. [Google Scholar]
  3. Amexo M, Tolhurst R, Barnish G, Bates I, 2004. Malaria misdiagnosis: effects on the poor and vulnerable. Lancet 364 : 1896–1898. [Google Scholar]
  4. Coleman R, Maneechat N, Rachaphaew N, Kumpitak C, Miller RS, Soyseng V, Thimasarn K, Sattabongkot J, 2002. Comparison of field and expert laboratory microscopy for active surveillance for asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax in western Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg 67 : 141–144. [Google Scholar]
  5. McKenzie FE, Sirichaisinthop J, Miller RS, Gasser RA Jr, Wongsrichanalai C, 2003. Dependence of malaria detection and species diagnosis by microscopy on parasite density. Am J Trop Med Hyg 69 : 372–376. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ohrt C, Purnomo, Sutamihardja MA, Tang D, Kain KC, 2002. Impact of microscopy error on estimates of protective efficacy in malaria-prevention trials. J Infect Dis 186 : 540–546. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gilles H, 1993. Diagnostic Methods in Malaria. Londan: Edward Arnold.
  8. Snounou G, Viriyakosol S, Jarra W, Thaithong S, Brown KN, 1993. Identification of the four human malaria parasite species in field samples by the polymerase chain reaction and detection of a high prevalence of mixed infections. Mol Biochem Parasitol 58 : 283–292. [Google Scholar]
  9. Arai M, Kunisada K, Kim H, Miyake H, Mizukoshi C, Kakutani T, Yamane A, Nakagami S, Kawai S, Kawamoto F, Wataya Y, 1996. A colorimetric DNA diagnostic method for falciparum malaria and vivax malaria: a field trial in the Solomon Islands. Nucleosides Nucleotides 15 : 719–731. [Google Scholar]
  10. Singh B, Bobogare A, Cox-Singh J, Snounou G, Abdullah MS, Rahman HA, 1999. A genus- and species-specific nested polymerase chain reaction malaria detection assay for epidemiologic studies. Am J Trop Med Hyg 60 : 687–692. [Google Scholar]
  11. Schindler HC, Montenegro L, Montenegro R, Carvalho AB, Abath FG, Jaureguiberry G, 2001. Development and optimization of polymerase chain reaction-based malaria diagnostic methods and their comparison with quantitative buffy coat assay. Am J Trop Med Hyg 65 : 355–361. [Google Scholar]
  12. Laoboonchai A, Kawamoto F, Thanoosingha N, Kojima S, Scott Miller RR, Kain KC, Wongsrichanalai C, 2001. PCR-based ELISA technique for malaria diagnosis of specimens from Thailand. Trop Med Int Health 6 : 458–462. [Google Scholar]
  13. McNamara DT, Thomson JM, Kasehagen LJ, Zimmerman PA, 2004. Development of a multiplex PCR-ligase detection reaction assay for diagnosis of infection by the four parasite species causing malaria in humans. J Clin Microbiol 42 : 2403–2410. [Google Scholar]
  14. Whiley DM, LeCornec GM, Baddeley A, Savill J, Syrmis MW, Mackay IM, Siebert DJ, Burns D, Nissen M, Sloots TP, 2004. Detection and differentiation of Plasmodium species by polymerase chain reaction and colorimetric detection in blood samples of patients with suspected malaria. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 49 : 25–29. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mockenhaupt FP, Ulmen U, von Gaertner C, Bedu-Addo G, Bienzle U, 2002. Diagnosis of placental malaria. J Clin Microbiol 40 : 306–308. [Google Scholar]
  16. Nsobya SL, Parikh S, Kironde F, Lubega G, Kamya MR, Rosenthal PJ, Dorsey G, 2004. Molecular evaluation of the natural history of asymptomatic parasitemia in Ugandan children. J Infect Dis 189 : 2220–2226. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee MA, Tan CH, Aw LT, Tang CS, Singh M, Lee SH, Chia HP, Yap EP, 2002. Real-time fluorescence-based PCR for detection of malaria parasites. J Clin Microbiol 40 : 4343–4345. [Google Scholar]
  18. Farcas GA, Zhong KJ, Mazzulli T, Kain KC, 2004. Evaluation of the RealArt Malaria LC real-time PCR assay for malaria diagnosis. J Clin Microbiol 42 : 636–638. [Google Scholar]
  19. Rougemont M, van Saanen M, Sahli R, Hinrikson HP, Bille J, Jaton K, 2004. Detection of four Plasmodium species in blood from humans by 18S rRNA gene subunit-based and species-specific real-time PCR assays. J Clin Microbiol 42 : 5636–5643. [Google Scholar]
  20. Smith T, Uhl J, Espy M, Sloan L, Vetter E, Jones M, Rosenblatt J, Cockerill FI, 2004. Development, implementation, and trend analysis of real-time PCR tests for the clinical microbiology laboratory. Clin Microbiol Newsletter 26 : 145–153. [Google Scholar]
  21. Coyne SR, Craw PD, Norwood DA, Ulrich MP, 2004. Comparative analysis of the Schleicher and Schuell IsoCode STIX DNA isolation device and the Qiagen QIAamp DNA Mini Kit. J Clin Microbiol 42 : 4859–4862. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhong KJ, Salas CJ, Shafer R, Gubanov A, Gasser RA Jr, Magill AJ, Forney JR, Kain KC, 2001. Comparison of IsoCode STIX and FTA Gene Guard collection matrices as whole-blood storage and processing devices for diagnosis of malaria by PCR. J Clin Microbiol 39 : 1195–1196. [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...


  • Received : 31 Jan 2005
  • Accepted : 20 Jun 2005

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error