Volume 73, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645


One of the main problems with dengue is the control of , its major vector. In Brazil, the current control program for and populations includes larval density surveys. An interesting alternative is the use of a distinct index, the Premise Condition Index (PCI). This tool relates conditions of property, such as houses and yards, and the degree of shade with the occurrence of sp. oviposition, and is calculated as scores from 3 to 9. The lowest score indicates property in good condition and an unfavorable breeding environment, while the highest score indicates property at high risk for infestation by sp. The present study is based on the application of the PCI in an urban area of Botucatu, Brazil to confirm its effectiveness.


Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. McBride WJ, Bielefelted-Ohmann H, 2000. Dengue viral infections; pathogenesis and epidemiology. Microbes Infect 2 : 1041–1050. [Google Scholar]
  2. Forattini OP, 1986. Identificação de Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Skuse) no Brasil. Rev Saude Publica 20 : 244–245. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ayres CF, Romao TP, Melo-Santos MA, Furtado AF, 2002. Genetic diversity in Brazilian populations of Aedes albopictus. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 97 : 871–875. [Google Scholar]
  4. Reiter P, Sprenger D, 1987. The used tire trade: a mechanism for the worldwide dispersal of container breeding mosquitoes. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 3 : 494–501. [Google Scholar]
  5. Craven RB, Eliason DA, Francy DB, Reiter P, Campos EG, Jakob WL, Smith GC, Bozzi CJ, Moore CG, Maupin GO, Monath TP, 1988. Importation of Aedes albopictus and other exotic mosquito species into the United States in used tires from Asia. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 4 : 138–142. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mitchell CJ, 1995. The role of Aedes albopictus as an arbovirus vector. Parassitologia 37 : 109–113. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ibanez-Bernal S, Briseno B, Mutebi JP, Argot E, Rodriguez G, Martinez-Campos C, Paz R, de la Fuente-San Roman P, Tapia-Conyer R, Flisser A, 1997. First record in America of Aedes albopictus naturally infected with dengue virus during the 1995 outbreak at Reynosa, Mexico. Med Vet Entomol 11 : 305–309. [Google Scholar]
  8. Miller BR, Ballinger ME, 1988. Aedes albopictus mosquitoes introduced into Brazil: vector competence for yellow fever and dengue viruses. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 82 : 476–477. [Google Scholar]
  9. Rodhain F, 1995. Aedes albopictus: a potential problem in France. Parassitologia 37 : 115–119. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hawley WA, Pumpuni CB, Brady RH, Graig GB Jr, 1989. Overwintering survival of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) eggs in Indiana. J Med Entomol 26 : 122–129. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hanson SM, Graig GB Jr, 1994. Cold acclimation, diapause, and geographic origin affect cold hardiness in eggs of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol 31 : 192–201. [Google Scholar]
  12. Rawlins SC, Martinez R, Wiltshire S, Legall G, 1998. A comparision of surveillance systems for the dengue vector Aedes aegypti in Port of Spain, Trinidad. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 14 : 131–136. [Google Scholar]
  13. Pontes RJ, Freeman J, Oliveira-Lima JW, Hodgson JC, Spielman A, 2000. Vector densities that potentiate dengue outbreaks in a Brazilian city. Am J Trop Med Hyg 62 : 378–383. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ministério da Saúde: Fundação Nacional da Saúde, 2001. Dengue Instruções para Pessoal de Combate ao Vetor: Manual de Normas Técnicas. Revised third edition. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde: Fundação Nacional da Saúde.
  15. Tun-Lin W, Kay BH, Barnes A, 1995. The premise condition index: a tool for streamlining surveys of Aedes aegypti. Am J Trop Med Hyg 53 : 591–594. [Google Scholar]
  16. Forattini OP, 2002. Culicidologia Médica. Volume 2. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo, 411–415.
  17. Braga IA, Gomes AC, Nelson M, Mello RCG, Bergamaschi DP, Souza JMP, 2000. Comparação entre pesquisa larvária e armadilha de oviposição, para detecção de Aedes aegypti. Ver Soc Bras Med Trop 33 : 347–353. [Google Scholar]
  18. Marques CCA, Marques GRAM, Brito M, Santos-Neto LG, Ishibashi VC, Gomes FA, 1993. Estudo comparativo de eficácia de larvitrampas e ovitrampas para vigilância de vetores de dengue e febre amarela. Rev Saude Publica 27 : 237–241. [Google Scholar]
  19. Serufo JC, Oca HM, Tavares VA, Souza AM, Rosa RV, Jamal MC, Lemos JR, Oliveira MA, Nogueira RMR, Schatzmayr HG, 1993. Isolation of dengue virus type 1 from larvae of Aedes albopictus in Campos Altos City, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 88 : 503–504. [Google Scholar]
  20. Shroyer DA, 1990. Vertical maintenance of dengue-1 virus in sequential generation of Aedes albopictus. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 6 : 312. [Google Scholar]
  21. Freier JE, Rosen L, 1987. Vertical transmission of dengue viruses by mosquitoes of the Aedes scutellaris group. Am J Trop Med Hyg 37 : 640. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gubler DJ, Sather GE, Kuno G, Cabral JR, 1986. Dengue 3 virus transmission in Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg 35 : 1280–1284. [Google Scholar]
  23. Rosen L, Gubler DJ, 1974. The use of mosquitoes to detect and propagate dengue viruses. Am J Trop Med Hyg 23 : 1153–1160. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gómez FE, Suárez CMM, Cardenas RC, 2001. Spa: Factores que modificam los índices larvários de Aedes aegypti en Colima, Mexico. Rev Panam Salud Publica 10 : 6–12. [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Received : 02 Apr 2004
  • Accepted : 24 Feb 2005

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error