1921
Volume 72, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645

Abstract

The reliability and validity of the earlier developed Buruli ulcer functional limitation score (BUFLS) questionnaire was assessed. Of 638 former Buruli ulcer patients (of 678 individuals examined), sufficient items on daily activities (≥ 13 of the 19) were applicable to calculate a score. To determine the validity, the functional limitation scores of the 638 individuals were compared with the global impression of the limitations, range of motion (ROM), and the social impact (change of occupation or education) of Buruli ulcer. To determine inter-observer reliability, the functional limitation score was reassessed in 107 participants within one and three weeks after the first interview by another interviewer and interpreter. Both global impression and ROM correlated well with the functional limitation scores (ρ = 0.66 and ρ = 0.61). The inter-observer reliability of 107 participants as measured by an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.86 was very good. The functional limitation scores measured in the second assessment were significantly higher than in the first assessment. This should be taken into account when the functional limitation score is used for the individual patient. The BUFLS can be used as for between group comparisons of endpoints in clinical trials and in the planning of resources.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2005.72.449
2005-04-01
2017-11-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/14761645/72/4/0720449.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2005.72.449&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Asiedu K, Raviglione M, Scherpbier R, 1998. International Conference on Buruli Ulcer Control and Research. Yamoussoukro, Côte d’Ivoire, July 6–8, 1998. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  2. Stienstra Y, van der Graaf WTA, te Meerman GJ, The TH, de Leij LF, van der Werf TS, 2001. Susceptibility to development of Mycobacterium ulcerans disease: review of possible risk factors. Trop Med Int Health 6 : 554–562.
  3. van der Werf TS, van der Graaf WTA, Tappero JW, Asiedu K, 1999. Mycobacterium ulcerans infection. Lancet 354 : 1013–1018.
  4. Asiedu K, Scherpbier RW, Raviglione M, 2000. Buruli Ulcer—Mycobacterium ulcerans Infection. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  5. Teelken MA, Stienstra Y, Ellen DE, Quarshie E, Klutse E, van der Graaf WTA, van der Werf TS, 2003. Buruli ulcer: differences in treatment outcome between two centres in Ghana. Acta Trop 88 : 51–56.
  6. Ellen DE, Stienstra Y, Teelken MA, Dijkstra PU, van der Graaf WTA, van der Werf TS, 2003. Assessment of functional limitations caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans infection: towards a Buruli ulcer functional limitation score. Trop Med Int Health 8 : 90–96.
  7. Stienstra Y, Dijkstra PU, Guedenon A, Johnson RC, Ampadu EO, Mensah T, Klutse EY, Etuaful S, Deepak S, van der Graaf WTA, van der Werf TS, 2004. Development of a questionnaire assessing Buruli ulcer-induced functional limitation. Am J Trop Med Hyg 70 : 318–322.
  8. Streiner DL, Norman GR, 1989. Health Measurement Scales. A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. Gerhardt JJ, Rondinelli RD, 2001. Goniometric techniques for range-of-motion assessment. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 12 : 507–527.
  10. Bland JM, Altman DG, 1999. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8 : 135–160.
  11. Bland JM, Altman DG, 1986. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1 : 307–310.
  12. Brouwer S, Kuijer W, Dijkstra P, Goeken L, Groothoff J, Geertzen J, 2004. Reliability and stability of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire: intra class correlation and limits of agreement. Disabil Rehabil 26 : 162–165.
  13. Jensen MP, 2003. Questionnaire validation: a brief guide for readers of the research literature. Clin J Pain 19 : 345–352.
  14. Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Bickenbach J, Kostanjsek N, Schneider M, 2003. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a new tool for understanding disability and health. Disabil Rehabil 25 : 565–571.
  15. van Brakel WH, Anderson AM, Worpel FC, Saiju R, Bk HB, Sherpa S, Sunwar SK, Gurung J, de Boer M, Scholten E, 1999. A scale to assess activities of daily living in persons affected by leprosy. Lepr Rev 70 : 314–323.
  16. Brandsma JW, van Brakel WH, 2003. WHO disability grading: operational definitions. Lepr Rev 74 : 366–373.
  17. Guyatt GH, Kirshner B, Jaeschke R, 1992. Measuring health status: what are the necessary measurement properties? J Clin Epidemiol 45 : 1341–1345.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2005.72.449
Loading
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2005.72.449
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Received : 01 Jun 2004
  • Accepted : 12 Aug 2004

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error