1921
Volume 69, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645

Abstract

Despite the wealth of information on the prevalence and correlates of canine infection (CLI), data on its incidence are still sparse, and little is known regarding risk factors for CLI. We studied a cohort of dogs in an urban area in Brazil to determine whether incidence varied with age, breed, and environmental characteristics. The mean follow-up was 1.5 years, and the crude incidence rate was 11.8 cases/100 dog-years (95% confidence interval [CI] = 8.6–15.6). In the multivariate analysis, short fur was the strongest predictor of CLI (relative risk [RR] = 9.4). In addition, our data indicate that raising pigs (RR = 4.1), chickens (RR = 3.3), or other livestock (RR = 2.6) significantly increased the risk of CLI. Thus, suggesting control measures directed towards modifying the environmental factors favoring contact between vectors, reservoirs, and susceptible humans, such as proximity to pigpens or hen houses. Furthermore, conventional control programs of insecticidal spraying of human dwellings should also apply insecticide in and around animal sheds.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2003.69.393
2003-10-01
2017-09-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/14761645/69/4/0690393.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2003.69.393&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Miles MA, Vexenat JA, Campos JHF, Fonseca de Castro JA, 1999. Canine Leishmaniasis in Latin America: Control Strategies for Visceral Leishmaniasis.Proceedings of the International Canine Leishmaniasis Forum, Barcelona, Spain. Wiesbaden, Germany: Hoechst Roussel Vet: 46–53.
  2. Coutinho SG, Nunes MP, Marzochi MC, Tramontano N, 1985. A survey for American cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis among 1,342 dogs from areas in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) where the human diseases occur. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 80 : 17–22.
  3. Paranhos-Silva M, Freitas LA, Santos WC, Grimaldi GJ, Pontes-de-Carvalho LC, Oliveira-dos-Santos AJ, 1996. A cross-sectional serodiagnostic survey of canine leishmaniasis due to Leishmania chagasi. Am J Trop Med Hyg 55 : 39–44.
  4. França-Silva JC, da Costa RT, Siqueira AM, Machado-Coelho GLL, da Costa CA, Mayrink W, Vieira EP, Costa JS, Genaro O, Nascimento E, 2003. Epidemiology of canine visceral leishmaniasis in the endemic area of Montes Claros municipally, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Vet Parasitol 111 : 161–173.
  5. Courtenay O, Quinnell RJ, Garcez LM, Shaw JJ, Dye C, 2002. Infectiousness of a cohort of Brazilian dogs: why culling fails to control visceral leishmaniasis in areas of high transmission. J Infect Dis 186 : 1314–1320.
  6. Ashford DA, David JR, Freire M, David R, Sherlock I, Eulalio MC, Sampaio DP, Badaro R, 1998. Studies on control of visceral leishmaniasis: impact of dog control on canine and human visceral leishmaniasis in Jacobina, Bahia, Brazil. Am JTrop Med Hyg 59 : 53–57.
  7. Paranhos-Silva M, Nascimento EG, Melro MC, Oliveira GG, dos Santos WL, Pontes-de-Carvalho LC, Oliveira-dos-Santos AJ, 1998. Cohort study on canine emigration and Leishmania infection in an endemic area for American visceral leishmaniasis. Implications for the disease control. Acta Trop 69 : 75–83.
  8. Amela C, Mendez I, Torcal JM, Medina G, Pachon I, Canavate C, 1995. Epidemiology of canine leishmaniasis in the Madrid region. Eur J Epidemiol 11 : 157–161.
  9. Dye C, Killick-Kendrick R, Vitutia MM, Walton R, Killick-Kendrick M, Harith AE, Guy MW, Canavate MC, Hasibeder G, 1992. Epidemiology of canine leishmaniasis: prevalence, incidence and basic reproduction number calculated from a cross-sectional serological survey on the island of Gozo, Malta. Parasitology 105 : 35–41.
  10. Zaffaroni E, Rubaudo L, Lanfranchi P, Mignone W, 1999. Epidemiological patterns of canine leishmaniasis [correction of leishmaniosis] in Western Liguria (Italy). Vet Parasitol 81 : 11–19.
  11. Rodrigues AC, dos Santos AB, Feitosa LF, Santana CS, Nascimento EG, Moreira ED Jr, 1999. Criação peridomiciliar de galináceos aumenta o risco de leishmaniose visceral humana. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 32: 12–13.
  12. Alexander B, de Carvalho RL, McCallum H, Pereira MH, 2002. Role of the domestic chicken (Gallus gallus) in the epidemiology of urban visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis 8 : 1480–1485.
  13. Travi BL, Osorio Y, Becerra MT, Adler GH, 1998. Dynamics of Leishmania chagasi infection in small mammals of the undisturbed and degraded tropical dry forests of northern Colombia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 92 : 275–278.
  14. Guy MW, Killick-Kendrick R, Gill GS, Rioux JA, Bray RS, 1984. Ecology of leishmaniasis in the south of France. 19. Determination of the hosts of Phlebotomus ariasi Tonnoir, 1921 in the Cevennes by bloodmeal analyses. Ann Parasitol Hum Comp 59 : 449–458.
  15. Mutinga MJ, Kihara SM, Lohding A, Mutero CM, Ngatia TA, Karanu F, 1989. Leishmaniasis in Kenya: description of leishmaniasis of a domestic goat from Transmara, Narok District, Kenya. Trop Med Parasitol 40 : 91–96.
  16. Brazil RP, Nascimento MDSB, Macau RP, 1987. Infecção natural do porco (Sus scrofa) por Leishmania em foco recente de leishmaniose tegumentar na Ilha de São Luiz, Maranhão. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 82 : 145.
  17. Corredor A, Gallego JF, Tesh RB, Morales A, de Carrasquilla CF, Young DG, Kreutzer RD, Boshell J, Palau MT, Caceres E, Pelaez D, 1989. Epidemiology of visceral leishmaniasis in Colombia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 40 : 480–486.
  18. Morrison AC, Ferro C, Tesh RB, 1993. Host preferences of the sand fly Lutzomyia longipalpis at an endemic focus of American visceral leishmaniasis in Colombia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 49 : 68–75.
  19. Moreno J, Alvar J, 2002. Canine leishmaniasis: epidemiological risk and the experimental model. Trends Parasitol 18 : 399–405.
  20. Bandeira CG, Tellez CCC, Nascimento EG, Carvalho LCP, Paranhos-Silva M, Moreira ED Jr, 1999. Estudo de corte transversal de fatores de risco para leishmaniose visceral canina(LVC) numa área endemica em Jequié, Bahia, Brasil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 32 : 9–10.
  21. Cox DR, 1972. Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc B 34 : 187–220.
  22. Gradoni L, Gramiccia M, Mancianti F, Pieri S, 1988. Studies on canine leishmaniasis control. 2. Effectiveness of control measures against canine leishmaniasis in the Isle of Elba, Italy. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 82 : 568–571.
  23. Abranches P, Silva-Pereira MC, Conceicao-Silva FM, Santos-Gomes GM, Janz JG, 1991. Canine leishmaniasis: pathological and ecological factors influencing transmission of infection. J Parasitol 77 : 557–561.
  24. Fisa R, Gallego M, Castillejo S, Aisa MJ, Serra T, Riera C, Carrio J, Gallego J, Portus M, 1999. Epidemiology of canine leishmaniosis in Catalonia (Spain) the example of the Priorat focus. Vet Parasitol 83 : 87–97.
  25. Morillas F, Rabasco FS, Ocaña J, Martin-Sanchez J, Ocaña-Wihelmi J, Acedo C, Sanchiz-Marin MC, 1996. Leishmaniose in the focus of the Axarquía region, Malaga privince, southern Spain: a survey of the human, dogs, and vector. Parasitol Res 82 : 569–570.
  26. Sideris V, Karagouni E, Papadopoulou G, Garifallou A, Dotsika E, 1996. Canine visceral leishmaniasis in the great Athens area, Greece. Parasite 3 : 125–130.
  27. Ferro C, Pardo R, Torres M, Morrison AC, 1997. Larval micro-habitats of Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae) in an endemic focus of visceral leishmaniasis in Colombia. J Med Entomol 34 : 719–728.
  28. Ferro C, Morrison AC, Torres M, Pardo R, Wilson ML, Tesh RB, 1995. Age structure, blood-feeding behavior, and Leishmania chagasi infection in Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae) at an endemic focus of visceral leishmaniasis in Colombia. J Med Entomol 32 : 618–629.
  29. Alexander JB, 1987. Dispersal of phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in a Colombian coffee plantation. J Med Entomol 24 : 552–558.
  30. Morrison AC, Ferro C, Morales A, Tesh RB, Wilson ML, 1993. Dispersal of the sand fly Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae) at an endemic focus of visceral leishmaniasis in Colombia. J Med Entomol 30 : 427–435.
  31. Dye C, Davies CR, Lainson R, 1991. Communication among phlebotomine sandflies: a field study of domesticated Lutzomyia longipalpis populations in Amazonian Brazil. Anim Behav 42 : 183–192.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2003.69.393
Loading
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.2003.69.393
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Received : 02 Jul 2003
  • Accepted : 07 Aug 2003

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error