Volume 69, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645


Diagnosis of infection in dogs by detecting adult worms recovered post mortem or purged from the intestines after treatment with arecoline is not suitable for mass screening. Large-scale diagnosis by detection of copro-antigens is useful but only with relatively high intensity infections, and only by genus. To provide a more sensitive and specific diagnosis, a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was developed, that amplified a target repeated sequence (EgG1 III) newly identified in the genome of the common sheep strain of . This repeated sequence consists of approximately 6,900 copies, arranged in tandem, in groups of 2–6 repeats. The corresponding primers used in the PCR easily detected a single egg with no cross-amplification of DNA from closely related cestodes, including and spp. Fecal samples from naturally infected dogs, with 2–10,000 worms at necropsy, were all PCR positive, while or spp. positive controls as well as non-endemic controls were all PCR negative. This copro-PCR assay was demonstrated to be 100% specific and also detected all necropsy-positive -infected dogs. It is suggested that this copro-PCR assay has the potential for pre-mortem diagnosis of infection even in areas where and are co-endemic.


Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. WHO, 2001. WHO/OIE Manual on Echinococcosis in Humans and Animals, a Public Health Problem of Global Concern. Eckert J, Gemmel MA, Meslin FX, Pawlowski ZS, eds. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  2. Eckert J, Conraths FJ, Tackmann K, 2000. Echinococcosis: an emerging or re- emerging zoonosis? Int J Parasitol 30 : 1283–1294. [Google Scholar]
  3. Craig PS, Rogan MT, Allan JC, 1996. Detection, screening and community epidemiology of taeniid cestode zoonoses: cystic echinococcosis, alveolar echinococcosis and cysticercosis. Adv Parasitol 38 : 169–250. [Google Scholar]
  4. WHO (FAO/UNEP/WHO), 1981. Guidelines for Surveillance, Prevention and Control of Hydatid Disease. Eckert J, Gemmel MA, Soulsby EJL, eds. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  5. Allan JC, Craig PS, Garcia Novel J, Mencos F, Liu D, Wang Y, Wen H, Zhou P, Stringer R, Rogan M, Zeyhle E, 1992. Coproantigen detection for immunodiagnosis of echinococcosis and taeniasis in dogs and humans. Parasitology 104 : 347–356. [Google Scholar]
  6. Deplazes P, Jimenez-Palacios S, Gottstein B, Skaggs J, Eckert J, 1994. Detection of Echinococcus coproantigens in stray dogs of northern Spain. Appl Parasitol 35 : 297–301. [Google Scholar]
  7. El-Shehabi FS, Kamhawi SA, Schanz PM, Craig PS, Abdel-Hafez SK, 2000. Diagnosis of canine echinococcosis: comparison of coproantigen detection with necropsy in stray dogs and red foxes from northern Jordan. Parasite 7 : 83–90. [Google Scholar]
  8. Jenkins DJ, Fraser A, Bradshaw H, Craig PS, 2000. Detection of Echinococcus granulosus coproantigens in Australian canids with natural or experimental infection. J Parasitol 86 : 140–145. [Google Scholar]
  9. Moro PL, Bonifacio N, Gilman RH, Lopera L, Silva B, Takumoto R, Verastegui M, Cabrera L, 1999. Field diagnosis of Echinococcus granulosus infection among intermediate and definitive hosts in an endemic focus of human cystic echinococcosis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 93 : 611–615. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bretagne S, Guillou JP, Monad M, Houin R, 1993. Detection of Echinococcus multilocularis DNA in fox faeces using DNA amplification. Parasitology 106 : 193–199. [Google Scholar]
  11. Dinkel A, von Nickisch-Rosenegk M, Bilger B, Merli M, Lucius R, Roming T, 1998. Detection of Echinococcus multilocularis in the definitive host: coprodiagnosis by PCR as an alternative to necropsy. J Clin Microbiol 36 : 1871–1876. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cabrera M, Canova S, Rosenvzvit M, Guarnera E, 2002. Identification of Echinococcus granulosus eggs. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 44 : 29–34. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hamburger J, Xu YX, Ramzi RM, Jourdane J, Ruppel A, 1998. Development and laboratory evaluation of a polymerase chain reaction for monitoring Schistosoma mansoni infestation of water. Am Trop Med Hyg 59 : 468–473. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hamburger J, He-Na, Abbasi I, Ramzy RM, Jourdane J, Ruppel A, 2001. Polymerase chain reaction assay based on a highly repeated sequence of Schistosoma haematobium: a potential tool for monitoring schistosome-infested water. Am J Trop Med Hyg 65 : 907–911. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hertel J, Hamburger, Haberl B, Hass W, 2002. Detection of bird schistosomes by PCR and filter- hybridization. Exp Parasitol 101 : 57–63. [Google Scholar]
  16. Rosenzvit MC, Canova SG, Kamenetzky L, Ledesma B, Guarnera EA, 1997. Echinococcus granulosus: cloning and characterization of a tandemly repeated DNA element. Exp Parasitol 87 : 65–68. [Google Scholar]
  17. Rishi AK, McManus D, 1987. Genomic cloning of human Echinococcus granulosus DNA: isolation of recombinant plasmids and their use as genetic markers in strain characterization. Parasitology 94 : 369–383. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis, 1989. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Second edition. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
  19. Buluwela L, Forster A, Boehm T, Rabbitts TH, 1989. A rapid procedure for colony screening using nylon filters. Nucleic Acids Res 17 : 452. [Google Scholar]
  20. van der Giessen JWB, Rombout YB, Franchimont JH, Limper LP, Homan WH, 1999. Detection of Echinococcus multilocularis in foxes in The Netherlands. Vet Parasitol 82 : 49–57. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hamburger J, Turetski T, Kapeller I, Deresievicz R, 1991. Highly repeated DNA sequences in the genome of Schistosoma mansoni recognized by a species-specific probe. Mol Biochem Parasitol 44 : 73–80. [Google Scholar]
  22. McReynolds LA, DeSimone SM, Williams SA, 1986. Cloning and comparison of repeated DNA sequences from the human filarial parasite Brugia malayi and Brugia pahangi. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83 : 797–801. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kaplan RM, Dame JB, Reddy GR, Cortney CH, 1995. A repetitive DNA probe for the sensitive detection of Fasciola hepatica infected snails. Int J Parasitol 25 : 601–610. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gonzalez LM, Montero E, Harrison LJ, Parkhouse RM, Garate T, 2000. Differential diagnosis of Taenia saginata and Taenia solium infection by PCR. J Clin Microbiol 38 : 737–744. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bowles J, McManus DP, 1993. Rapid discrimination of Echinococcus species and strains using a polymerase chain reaction-based RFLP method. Mol Biochem Parasitol 57 : 231–239. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ramzy RM, Farid HA, Kamal IH, Ibrahim GH, Morsy ZS, Faris R, Weil GJ, Williams SA, Gad AM, 1997. A polymerase chain reaction-based assay for detection of Wuchereria bancrofti in human blood and Culex pipiens. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 91 : 156–160. [Google Scholar]
  27. Katholi CR, Toe L, Merriweather A, Unnasch TR, 1995. Determining the prevalence of Onchocerca volvulus infection in vector populations by polymerase chain reaction screening of pools of black flies. J Infect Dis 172 : 1414–1417. [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Received : 13 Mar 2003
  • Accepted : 27 May 2003

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error