Volume 68, Issue 6
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645


To determine whether proximity to flowering maize enhances the development of larval anopheline mosquitoes breeding in turbid water and when crowded, we evaluated the development of larval under various conditions of turbidity, larval density, and proximity to pollen-shedding maize in simulated breeding puddles in a malaria-endemic site. In naturally formed puddles, water turbidity, as well as larval density, increased as the rainy season progressed. In sites remote from flowering maize, more pupae developed and the resulting adults were larger in relatively clear water than in turbid water, and larval crowding inhibited development. In close proximity to flowering maize, however, larval development was little affected by water turbidity and larval crowding. Larvae of this member of the African complex of mosquitoes develop readily in turbid water and when crowded, provided that their breeding sites are located where maize pollen is abundant.


Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Minakawa N, Mutero CM, Githure JI, Beier JC, Yan G, 1999. Spatial distribution and habitat characterization of anopheline mosquito larvae in western Kenya. Am J Trop Med Hyg 61 : 1010–1016. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gimnig JE, Ombok M, Kamau L, Hawley WA, 2001. Characteristic of larval anopheline (Diptera: Culicidae) habitats in western Kenya. J Med Entomol 38 : 282–288. [Google Scholar]
  3. Robert V, Awono-Ambene HP, Thioulouse J, 1998. Ecology of larval mosquitoes, with special reference to Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae) in market-garden wells in urban Dakar, Senegal. J Med Entomol 35 : 948–955. [Google Scholar]
  4. Savage HM, Rejmankova E, Arredondo-Jim’enez JI, Roberts DR, Rodr’iguez MH, 1990. Limnological and botanical characterization of larval habitats for two primary malarial vectors, Anopheles albimanus and Anopheles pseudopunctipennis, in coastal areas of Chiapas State, Mexico. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 6 : 612–620. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ye-Ebiyo Y, Pollack R, Spielman A, 2000. Enhanced development in nature of larval Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes feeding on maize pollen. Am J Trop Med Hyg 63 : 90–93. [Google Scholar]
  6. Walker ED, Merritt RW, 1993. Bacterial enrichment in the surface microlayer of an Anopheles quadrimaculatus (Diptera: Culicidae) larval habitat. J Med Entomol 30 : 1050–1052. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gimnig JE, Ombok M, Otieno S, Kaufman MG, Vulule JM, Walker ED, 2002. Density-dependent development of Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae) larval in artificial habitats. J Med Entomol 39 : 162–172. [Google Scholar]
  8. Abose T, Ye-Ebiyo Y, Olana D, Alamrew D, Beyene Y, Regassa L, Mengesha A, 1998. Re-orientation and Definition of the Role of Malaria Vector-Control in Ethiopia. Geneva: World Health Organization. WHO/MAL/98.1085.
  9. Scott JA, Brogdon WG, Collins FH, 1993. Identification of single specimens of the Anopheles gambiae complex by the polymerase chain reaction. Am J Trop Med Hyg 49 : 520–529. [Google Scholar]
  10. White GB, 1974. Biological effects of intraspecific chromosomal polymorphism in malaria vector populations. Bull World Health Organ 50 : 299–306. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hunt RH, Coetzee M, Fettene M, 1988. The Anopheles gambiae complex: a new species from Ethiopia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 92 : 231–235. [Google Scholar]
  12. Crombie AC, 1942. The effect of crowding upon the oviposition of grain infesting insects. J Exp Biol 20 : 311–340. [Google Scholar]
  13. Fish D, Carpenter SR, 1982. Leaf litter and larval mosquito dynamics in treehole ecosystems. Ecology 63 : 283–288. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hawley WA, 1985. The effect of larval density on adult longevity of a mosquito, Aedes triseriatus: epidemiological consequences. J Anim Ecol 54 : 955–964. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mogi M, 1984. Distribution and overcrowding effects in mosquito larvae (Diptera: Culicidae) inhabiting taro axils in the Ryukyus, Japan. J Med Entomol 21 : 63–68. [Google Scholar]
  16. Agudelo F, Spielman A, 1984. Paradoxical effects of simulated larviciding on production of adult mosquitoes. Am J Trop Med Hyg 33 : 1267–1269. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ameneshewa B, Service MW, 1996. The relationship between female body size and survival rate of the malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis in Ethiopia. Med Vet Entomol 10 : 170–172. [Google Scholar]
  18. Reisen WK, 1975. Intraspecific competition in Anopheles stephensi. Mosq News 35 : 473–482. [Google Scholar]
  19. Briegel H, 1990. Fecundity, metabolism, and body size in Anopheles (Diptera: Culicidae), vectors of malaria. J Med Entomol 27 : 839–850. [Google Scholar]
  20. DeFoliart GR, Grimstad PR, Watts DM, 1987. Advances in mosquito-borne arbovirus/vector research. Annu Rev Entomol 32 : 479–505. [Google Scholar]
  21. Walker ED, Olds EJ, Merritt RW, 1988. Gut content analysis of mosquito larvae (Diptera: Culicidae) using DAPI stain and epifluorescence microscopy. J Med Entomol 25 : 551–554. [Google Scholar]
  22. Wilber CG, 1983. Turbidity in the Aquatic Environment: An Environmental Factor in Fresh and Oceanic Waters. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publishers.
  23. McCabe JM, Sandretto CL, 1985. Some Aquatic Impacts of Sediment, Nutrients, and Pesticides in Agricultural Runoff. Publication No. 201. East Lansing, MI: Limnological Research Laboratory, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University.
  24. Takken W, Klowden MJ, Chambers G, 1988. The effect of size on host seeking and blood meal utilization in Anopheles gambiae s.s. Giles (Diptera:Culicidae): the disadvantage of being small. J Med Entomol 35 : 639–645. [Google Scholar]
  25. Schneider P, Takken W, McCall PJ, 2000. Interspecific competition between sibling species larvae of Anopheles arabiensis and An. gambiae. Med Vet Entomol 14 : 165–170. [Google Scholar]
  26. Service MW, 1971. Studies on sampling larval populations of the Anopheles gambiae complex. Bull World Health Organ 45 : 169–180. [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Received : 25 Mar 2002
  • Accepted : 03 Mar 2003

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error