1921
Volume 102, Issue 6
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645

Abstract

Abstract.

The ongoing novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is threatening the global human population, including in countries with resource-limited health facilities. Severe bilateral pneumonia is the main feature of severe COVID-19, and adequate ventilatory support is crucial for patient survival. Although our knowledge of the disease is still rapidly increasing, this review summarizes current guidance on the best provision of ventilatory support, with a focus on resource-limited settings. Key messages include that supplemental oxygen is a first essential step for the treatment of severe COVID-19 patients with hypoxemia and should be a primary focus in resource-limited settings where capacity for invasive ventilation is limited. Oxygen delivery can be increased by using a non-rebreathing mask and prone positioning. The presence of only hypoxemia should in general not trigger intubation because hypoxemia is often remarkably well tolerated. Patients with fatigue and at risk for exhaustion, because of respiratory distress, will require invasive ventilation. In these patients, lung protective ventilation is essential. Severe pneumonia in COVID-19 differs in some important aspects from other causes of severe pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome, and limiting the positive end-expiratory pressure level on the ventilator may be important. This ventilation strategy might reduce the currently very high case fatality rate of more than 50% in invasively ventilated COVID-19 patients.

[open-access] This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.20-0283
2020-04-21
2020-10-31
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/14761645/102/6/tpmd200283.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.20-0283&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alhazzani W et al., 2020. Surviving sepsis campaign: guidelines on the management of critically ill adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Intensive Care Med [ePub ahead of print]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06022-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhang H, Penninger JM, Li Y, Zhong N, Slutsky AS, 2020. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a SARS-CoV-2 receptor: molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic target. Intensive Care Med 46: 586590.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Lescure FX et al., 2020. Clinical and virological data of the first cases of COVID-19 in Europe: a case series. Lancet Infect Dis [ePub ahead of print]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30200-0.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Huang C et al., 2020. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 395: 497506.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhou F et al., 2020. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 395: 10541062.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Tian S, Hu W, Niu L, Liu H, Xu H, Xiao SY, 2020. Pulmonary pathology of early-phase 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia in two patients with lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol [ePub ahead of print]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2020.02.010.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhou M, Zhang X, Qu J, 2020. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a clinical update. Front Med [ePub ahead of print]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-020-0767-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Tang N, Li D, Wang X, Sun Z, 2020. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost 18: 844847.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Verity R et al., 2020. Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis. Lancet Infect Dis [ePub ahead of print]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30243-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Yang X et al., 2020. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir Med [ePub ahead of print]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30079-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. van den Boom W, Hoy M, Sankaran J, Liu M, Chahed H, Feng M, See KC, 2020. The search for optimal oxygen saturation targets in critically Ill patients: observational data from large ICU databases. Chest 157: 566573.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Salehi S, Abedi A, Balakrishnan S, Gholamrezanezhad A, 2020. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review of Imaging findings in 919 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol [ePub ahead of print]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.20.23034.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhou S, Wang Y, Zhu T, Xia L, 2020. CT features of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia in 62 patients in Wuhan, China. AJR Am J Roentgenol [ePub ahead of print]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.20.22975.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Phua J et al., Asian Critical Care Clinical Trials G, 2020. Intensive care management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): challenges and recommendations. Lancet Respir Med [ePub ahead of print]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30161-2.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang L, Li X, Chen H, Yan S, Li D, Li Y, Gong Z, 2020. Coronavirus disease 19 Infection does not result in acute kidney Injury: an analysis of 116 hospitalized patients from Wuhan, China. Am J Nephrol [ePub ahead of print]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1159/000507471.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Meara JG et al., 2015. Global surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet 386: 569624.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Duke T, Peel D, Wandi F, Subhi R, Sa’avu M, Matai S, 2010. Oxygen supplies for hospitals in Papua New Guinea: a comparison of the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of methods for different settings. P N G Med J 53: 126138.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bradley BD, Light JD, Ebonyi AO, N'Jai PC, Ideh RC, Ebruke BE, Nyassi E, Peel D, Howie SR, 2016. Implementation and 8-year follow-up of an uninterrupted oxygen supply system in a hospital in the Gambia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 20: 11301134.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Bakare AA et al., 2020. Providing oxygen to children and newborns: a multi-faceted technical and clinical assessment of oxygen access and oxygen use in secondary-level hospitals in southwest Nigeria. Int Health 12: 6068.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Dat VQ, Long NT, Giang KB, Diep PB, Giang TH, Diaz JV, 2017. Healthcare infrastructure capacity to respond to severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) and sepsis in Vietnam: a low-middle income country. J Crit Care 42: 109115.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Chen W, Janz DR, Shaver CM, Bernard GR, Bastarache JA, Ware LB, 2015. Clinical characteristics and outcomes are similar in ARDS diagnosed by oxygen saturation/Fio2 ratio compared with pao2/Fio2 ratio. Chest 148: 14771483.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Riviello ED, Kiviri W, Twagirumugabe T, Mueller A, Banner-Goodspeed VM, Officer L, Novack V, Mutumwinka M, Talmor DS, Fowler RA, 2016. Hospital incidence and outcomes of the acute respiratory distress syndrome using the Kigali modification of the Berlin definition. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 193: 5259.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Vercesi V et al., 2018. External confirmation and exploration of the Kigali modification for diagnosing moderate or severe ARDS. Intensive Care Med 44: 523524.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Arabi YM, Arifi AA, Balkhy HH, Najm H, Aldawood AS, Ghabashi A, Hawa H, Alothman A, Khaldi A, Al Raiy B, 2014. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. Ann Intern Med 160: 389397.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Inglis R, Ayebale E, Schultz MJ, 2019. Optimizing respiratory management in resource-limited settings. Curr Opin Crit Care 25: 4553.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ayebare RR, Flick R, Okware S, Bodo B, Lamorde M, 2020. Adoption of COVID-19 triage strategies for low-income settings. Lancet Respir Med 8: e22.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM, 2013. Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med 369: 21262136.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Walkey AJ et al., 2017. Higher PEEP versus lower PEEP strategies for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc 14: S297S303.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Constantin JM et al., 2019. Personalised mechanical ventilation tailored to lung morphology versus low positive end-expiratory pressure for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in France (the LIVE study): a multicentre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med 7: 870880.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome N, Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A, 2000. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 342: 13011308.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Fan E et al., American Thoracic Society, European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, and Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2017. An Official American Thoracic Society/European Society of Intensive care Medicine/society of critical care medicine clinical practice guideline: mechanical ventilation in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 195: 12531263.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Rhodes A et al., 2017. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 43: 304377.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Villar J et al., Spanish Initiative for Epidemiology, Stratification and Therapies for ARDS (SIESTA) Investigators Network, 2017. A quantile analysis of plateau and driving pressures: effects on mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome receiving lung-protective ventilation. Crit Care Med 45: 843850.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Guerin C et al., 2013. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 368: 21592168.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Munshi L et al., 2017. Prone position for acute respiratory distress syndrome. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc 14: S280S288.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Scholten EL, Beitler JR, Prisk GK, Malhotra A, 2017. Treatment of ARDS with prone positioning. Chest 151: 215224.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Albert RK, Keniston A, Baboi L, Ayzac L, Guerin C, Proseva I, 2014. Prone position-induced improvement in gas exchange does not predict improved survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 189: 494496.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. van Meenen DM, Roozeman JP, Serpa Neto A, Pelosi P, Gama de Abreu M, Horn J, Cremer OL, Paulus F, Schultz MJ, Consortium M, 2019. Associations between changes in oxygenation, dead space and driving pressure induced by the first prone position session and mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Thorac Dis 11: 50045013.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Arentz M, Yim E, Klaff L, Lokhandwala S, Riedo FX, Chong M, Lee M, 2020. Characteristics and outcomes of 21 critically Ill patients with COVID-19 in Washington state. JAMA [ePub ahead of print]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.4326.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Bhatraju PK et al., 2020. Covid-19 in critically Ill patients in the seattle region - case series. N Engl J Med [ePub ahead of print]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2004500.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.20-0283
Loading
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.20-0283
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Received : 13 Apr 2020
  • Accepted : 15 Apr 2020
  • Published online : 21 Apr 2020
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error