1921
Volume 53, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645
USD

Abstract

Abstract

Recent reports have suggested that examination of one stool specimen is sufficient to detect protozoa in symptomatic patients. To verify this hypothesis, we examined specimens submitted to the regional laboratory of a large, prepaid health plan that provides primary care to a membership representative of the general population in northern California. We examined the number and results of stool specimen examinations in the two-month period before detection of in 125 infected persons, of in 154 infected persons, and of in 60 persons infected with this parasite. About 13% of the entire group had a single stool specimen examined, 19% had two examined, 65% had three examined, and 6% had more than three examined. Most infections were detected in the first specimen or specimens submitted, but many were not detected until later examination. Thirteen patients with (10.4%) required 4–9 examinations. The sensitivity of one examination was compared with that of three examinations; with the additional examinations, the yield increased 22.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 11.8–33.5%) for , 11.3% (95% CI = 6.9–81.8%) for , and 31.1% (95% CI = 17.7–54.4%) for . Our results suggest that a single stool specimen examination will miss many pathogenic protozoan infections in symptomatic persons.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.1995.53.36
1995-07-01
2017-09-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.1995.53.36
Loading

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error