1921
Volume 5, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645
USD

Abstract

Some fifteen years ago I wrote (Herms and Gray, 1940) that in any long existing situation a sceptical attitude may be valuable, for it is possible that an idea which has stood unchallenged for a generation may be wrong at least in part, not having kept pace with the accretions of new information.

Since at least 1910 it has been generally held that was vector of malaria in California, and that other anophelines had slight if any part in the chain of transmission. On the basis of the malaria then existing in California it appeared to be the principal if not the only effective vector. But in recent years more complete information as to the early history of the disease in the State, together with numerous observations by many workers in the field of mosquito control concerning the habits of the anophelines in California, as well as some recent outbreaks of malaria which differed in pattern from previous epidemic situations, have thrown doubt on the role of as the principal vector.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.1956.5.411
1956-05-01
2017-09-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.1956.5.411
Loading

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error