1921
Volume s1-28, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645
USD

Abstract

Introduction. In the treatment of intestinal amebiasis two classes of drugs, viz., iodohydroxyquinolines and arsenicals, are generally satisfactory from the standpoint of curative action and lack of toxicity. These agents are, however, essentially ineffective against extra-intestinal amebiasis, the commonest lesion of which is found in the liver as diffuse inflammation with or without abscess formation. For the treatment of these lesions emetine is highly effective, although it does not regularly exert curative activity upon intestinal infection. Emetine has the disadvantage of toxicity as manifested by occasional severe myocarditis and myositis as well as by minor but unpleasant toxic reactions including diarrhea, nausea and vomiting.

Since it is not possible in most instances of intestinal amebiasis to determine with certainty whether subclinical involvement of the liver is present, it would, at least theoretically, be desirable to direct treatment toward the liver as well as the intestine.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.1948.s1-28.107
1948-01-01
2017-09-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.1948.s1-28.107
Loading

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error