1921
Volume 101, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645

Abstract

Abstract.

Arboviral diseases are responsible for a high burden of disease in humans, and a significant part of disease risk reduction efforts relies on vector control methods. The elimination of potential breeding sites for the mosquito vectors and a higher level of literacy by the populations at risk could present a sustainable and environmentally friendly solution. This review aims to assess the efficacy of educational interventions for arboviral diseases on knowledge and self-reported behavior. A systematic literature search was performed using Cochrane, EMBASE, Global Health, and PubMed. References of articles retrieved were searched manually for further studies. Critical appraisal of the selected articles was performed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project tool, and studies with a control group were further assessed through the Cochrane’s risk of bias tool. A summary narrative of the results and a meta-analysis was conducted. Fourteen studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Overall, there was an increase in knowledge and in self-reported adoption of protective measures. No effect was found using solely printed material. A meta-analysis was performed separately for the two outcomes measured, which produced a mean standardized difference of 1.86 (95% CI: 1.33–2.39) in knowledge scores compared with the control groups. Regarding the self-reported protective behavior, the results show a summary value of odds ratio of 5.23 (95% CI: 3.09–7.36). Most of the educational interventions had a positive impact on knowledge and self-reported adoption of protective measures. More research producing stronger evidence and evaluating long-term impact is needed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.19-0170
2019-05-20
2020-09-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/14761645/101/2/tpmd190170.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.19-0170&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Weaver SC, 2013. Urbanization and geographic expansion of zoonotic arboviral diseases: mechanisms and potential strategies for prevention. Trends Microbiol 21: 360363.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Paixão ES, Teixeira MG, Rodrigues LC, 2018. Zika, chikungunya and dengue: the causes and threats of new and re-emerging arboviral diseases. BMJ Glob Health 3: e000530.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gubler DJ, 2002. The global emergence/resurgence of arboviral diseases as public health problems. Arch Med Res 33: 330342.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Tjaden NB, Suk JE, Fischer D, Thomas SM, Beierkuhnlein C, Semenza JC, 2017. Modelling the effects of global climate change on chikungunya transmission in the 21st century. Sci Rep 7: 3813.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bellini R, Zeller H, Van Bortel W, 2014. A review of the vector management methods to prevent and control outbreaks of West Nile virus infection and the challenge for Europe. Parasit Vectors 7: 323.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ibrahim NK, Abalkhail B, Rady M, Al-Bar H, 2009. An educational programme on dengue fever prevention and control for females in Jeddah high schools. East Mediterr Health J 15: 10581067.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Wisner B, Adams J, 2012. Vector and pest control. Environmental Health in Emergencies and Disasters : A Practical Guide. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Yasuoka J, Mangione TW, Spielman A, Levins R, 2006. Impact of education on knowledge, agricultural practices, and community actions for mosquito control and mosquito-borne disease prevention in rice ecosystems in Sri Lanka. Am J Trop Med Hyg 74: 10341042.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Marka A et al., 2013. West Nile virus state of the art report of MALWEST project. Int J Environ Res Public Health 10: 65346610.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Rozendaal JA, 1997. Vector Control: Methods for Use by Individuals and Communities. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Available at: http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/41968. Accessed June 24, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. CDC, 2012. Stormwater Management and Vector Breeding Habitats. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/ehs/docs/factsheets/Stormwater-Factsheet.pdf. Accessed June 24, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. WHO, 2017. Framework for a National Vector Control Need Assessment. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Arunachalam N, Tana S, Espino F, Kittayapong P, Abeyewickrem W, Wai KT, Tyagi BK, Kroeger A, Sommerfeld J, Petzold M, 2010. Eco-bio-social determinants of dengue vector breeding: a multicountry study in urban and periurban Asia. Bull World Health Organ 88: 173184.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bodner D, LaDeau SL, Biehler D, Kirchoff N, Leisnham PT, 2016. Effectiveness of print education at reducing urban mosquito infestation through improved resident-based management. PLoS One 11: e0155011.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. LaBeaud AD, Glinka A, Kippes C, King CH, 2009. School-based health promotion for mosquito-borne disease prevention in children. J Pediatr 155: 590592.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Al-Muhandis N, Hunter PR, 2011. The value of educational messages embedded in a community-based approach to combat dengue fever: a systematic review and meta regression analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5: e1278.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Heintze C, Garrido MV, Kroeger A, 2007. What do community-based dengue control programmes achieve? A systematic review of published evaluations. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 101: 317325.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group TP, 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6: e1000097.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Effective Public Health Practice Project, 1998. Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. Available at: https://merst.ca/ephpp/. Accessed August 4, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Thomas BH, Ciliska D, Dobbins M, Micucci S, 2004. A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 1: 176184.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC), 2017. Suggested Risk of Bias Criteria for EPOC Reviews. EPOC Resources for Review Authors. Oxford, United Kingdom: Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford. Available at: http://epoc.cochrane.org/resources/epoc-resources-review-authors. Accessed August 4, 2018.
  22. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC), 2017. Data Collection Form. Resources for Review Authors Available at: https://epoc.cochrane.org/sites/epoc.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/Resources-for-authors2017/good_practice_data_extraction_form.doc. Accessed August 4, 2018.
  23. Winch PJ, Leontsini E, Rigau-Pérez JG, Clark GG, Ruiz-Pérez M, Gubler DJ, 2002. Community-based dengue prevention programs in Puerto Rico: impact on knowledge, behavior, and residential mosquito infestation. Am J Trop Med Hyg 67: 363370.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lennon JL, Coombs DW, 2007. The utility of a board game for dengue haemorrhagic fever health education. Health Educ 107: 290306.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Arunachalam N, Tyagi BK, Samuel M, Krishnamoorthi R, Manavalan R, Tewari SC, Ashokkumar V, Kroeger A, Sommerfeld J, Petzold M, 2012. Community-based control of Aedes aegypti by adoption of eco-health methods in Chennai city, India. Pathog Glob Health 106: 488496.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Madeira NG, Macharelli CA, Pedras JF, Delfino MC, 2002. Education in primary school as a strategy to control dengue. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 35: 221226.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Therawiwat M, Fungladda W, Kaewkungwal J, Imamee N, Steckler A, 2005. Community-based approach for prevention and control of dengue hemorrhagic fever in Kanchanaburi province, Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 36: 14391449.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Saurabh S, Veerakumar AM, Kalaiselvi S, Palanivel C, 2014. Effectiveness of individual health education on the practice of dengue fever prevention in an urban area of Puducherry, India. Indian J Community Health 26: 434437.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Sreedevi A, Burru R, Rao G, Yalamanchili P, Subhaprada C, Kumari V, Kala S, Aruna M, 2016. Study on awareness about vector borne diseases and education about preventive measures in rural field practice areas of Kurnool medical college, Kurnool. Int J Med Sci Public Health 5: 18031807.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Choo MS, Blackwood RA, 2017. School-based health education in Yucatan, Mexico about the chikungunya virus and mosquito illness prevention. Infect Dis Rep 9: 6894.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Tram T, Anh N, Hung N, Lan N, Cam L, 2003. The impact of health education on mother’s knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of dengue haemorrhagic fever. Dengue Bull 27: 174180.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Suwanbamrung C, Kusol K, Tantraseneerate K, Promsupa S, Doungsin T, Thongchan S, Laupsa M, 2015. Developing the participatory education program for dengue prevention and control in the primary school, southern region, Thailand. Health 7: 12551267.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Suwanbamrung C, Tapalak N, Jitchun C, Promsuwan C, Prosupa S, Muenraj Y, Dumpan A, 2012. Student capacity building of dengue prevention and control: a study of an Islamic school, southern Thailand. Health 4: 366376.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Klasnja P, Pratt W, 2012. Healthcare in the pocket: mapping the space of mobile-phone health interventions. J Biomed Inform 45: 184198.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kroeger A, Meyer R, Mancheno M, González M, 2007. Health education for community-based malaria control: an intervention study in Ecuador, Colombia and Nicaragua. Trop Med Int Health 1: 836846.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ayi I, Nonaka D, Adjovu JK, Hanafusa S, Jimba M, Bosompem KM, Mizoue T, Takeuchi T, Boakye DA, Kobayashi J, 2010. School-based participatory health education for malaria control in Ghana: engaging children as health messengers. Malar J 9: 98.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Dike N, Onwujekwe O, Ojukwu J, Ikeme A, Uzochukwu B, Shu E, 2006. Influence of education and knowledge on perceptions and practices to control malaria in southeast Nigeria. Soc Sci Med 63: 103106.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Straughan PT, Ng EH, Lee HP, 1998. A randomized trial of the use of print material and personal contact to improve mammography uptake among screening non-attenders in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore 27: 838842.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Harvey HD, Fleming P, 2003. The readability and audience acceptance of printed health promotion materials used by environmental health departments. J Environ Health 65: 2228.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Morony S, Flynn M, McCaffery KJ, Jansen J, Webster AC, 2015. Readability of written materials for CKD patients: a systematic review. Am J Kidney Dis 65: 842850.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Armijo-Olivo S, Stiles CR, Hagen NA, Biondo PD, Cummings GG, 2012. Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research. J Eval Clin Pract 18: 1218.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.19-0170
Loading
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.19-0170
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplemental materials

  • Received : 27 Feb 2019
  • Accepted : 16 Apr 2019
  • Published online : 20 May 2019
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error