1921
Volume 100, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645

Abstract

Abstract.

In 2012, approximately 5.6 million Zambians did not have access to improved sanitation and around 2.1 million practiced open defecation. The Zambia Sanitation and Hygiene Program (ZSHP), featuring community-led total sanitation, began in November 2011 to increase the use of improved sanitation facilities and adopt positive hygiene practices. Using a pre- and post-design approach with a population-level survey, after 3 years of implementation, we evaluated the impact of ZSHP in randomly selected households in 50 standard enumeration areas (representing 26 of 65 program districts). We interviewed caregivers of children younger than 5 years old (1,204 and 1,170 female caregivers at baseline and end line, respectively) and inspected household toilet facilities and sites for washing hands. At end line, 80% of households had access to improved sanitation facilities versus 64.1% at baseline (prevalence ratio [PR] = 1.25; 95% CI: 1.18–1.31) and 14.1% did not have a toilet facility compared with 19.4% at baseline. At end line, 10.6% of households reported living in an open defecation-free certified village compared with 0.3% at baseline (PR = 32.0; 95% CI: 11.9–86.4). In addition, at end line, 33.4% of households had a specific place for washing hands and 61.4% of caregivers reported handwashing with a washing agent after defecation or before preparing food compared with 21.1% (PR = 1.59; 95% CI: 1.39–1.82) and 55.2% (PR = 1.11; 95% CI: 1.04–1.19) at baseline, respectively. Community-led total sanitation implementation in Zambia led to improvements in access to improved sanitation facilities, reduced open defecation, and better handwashing practices. There is however a need for enhanced investment in sanitation and hygiene promotion.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.18-0632
2019-02-18
2020-09-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/14761645/100/4/tpmd180632.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.18-0632&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. National Water Supply and Sanitation Council (NWASCO), 2012. 2013–2015 Strategic Plan. Lusaka, Zambia: NWASCO.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. United Nations. Sustainable Development Goals. Available at: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/. Accessed July 26, 2018.
  3. WHO/UNICEF. 2013. WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply and Sanitation. Estimates for the Use of Improved Sanitation Facilities Updated March 2012 for Zambia. New York, NY.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. WHO/UNICEF, 2014. Progress on Sanitation and Drinking Water. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Water and Sanitation Program (WSP). Economic Impacts of Poor Sanitation in Africa: Zambia 2012. Available at: https://www.wsp.org/sites/wsp.org/files/publications/WSP-ESI-Zambia.pdf. Accessed March 6, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Real-Time Monitoring or Rural Sanitation at Scale in Zambia Using Mobile-to-Web Technology. Available at: https://www.unicef.org/esaro/WASH-Field-M2W-low-res.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lawrence JJ, Yeboah-Antwi K, Biemba G, Ram PK, Osbert N, Sabin LL, Hamer DH, 2016. Beliefs, behaviors, and perceptions of community-led total sanitation and their relation to improved sanitation in rural Zambia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 94: 553562.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Barrington DJ, Sridharan S, Shields KF, Saunders SG, Souter RT, Bartram J, 2017. Sanitation marketing: a systematic review and theoretical critique using the capability approach. Soc Sci Med 194: 128134.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Venkataraman V, Crocker J, Karon A, Bartram J, 2018. Community-led total sanitation: a mixed-methods systematic review of evidence and its quality. Environ Health Perspect 126: 026001.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Planning Office, Evaluation and Research Office, Programme Division, 1995. Monitoring Progress toward the Goals of the World Summit for Children: A Practical Handbook for Multiple-Indicator Surveys. New York, NY: UNICEF.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. TN, Verma VK, 1997. An Analysis of Sample Designs and Sampling Errors of the Demographic and Health Surveys. DHS Analytical Reports No. 3. Calverton, MD: Macro International.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. United Nations Statistics Division, 2005. Designing Household Survey Samples: Practical Guidelines. New York, NY: Statistics Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Briceño B, Coville A, Gertler P, Martinez S, 2017. Are there synergies from combining hygiene and sanitation promotion campaigns: evidence from a large-scale cluster-randomized trial in rural Tanzania. PLoS One 12: e0186228.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Pickering AJ, Djebbari H, Lopez C, Coulibaly M, Alzua ML, 2015. Effect of a community-led sanitation intervention on child diarrhoea and child growth in rural Mali: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health 3: e701e711.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Crocker J, Abodoo E, Asamani D, Domapielle W, Gyapong B, Bartram J, 2016. Impact evaluation of training natural leaders during a community-led total sanitation intervention: a cluster-randomized field trial in Ghana. Environ Sci Technol 50: 88678875.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Crocker J, Geremew A, Atalie F, Yetie M, Bartram J, 2016. Teachers and sanitation promotion: an assessment of community-led total sanitation in Ethiopia. Environ Sci Technol 50: 65176525.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Cameron L, Shah M, Olivia S, 2013. Impact Evaluation of a Large-Scale Rural Sanitation Project in Indonesia. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 6360. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6360 Accessed November 18, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Guiteras R, Levinsohn J, Mobarak AM, 2015. Encouraging sanitation investment in the developing world: a cluster-randomized trial. Science 348: 903906.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Garn JV, Sclar GD, Freeman MC, Penakalapati G, Alexander KT, Brooks P, Rehfuess EA, Boisson S, Medlicott KO, Clasen TF, 2017. The impact of sanitation interventions on latrine coverage and latrine use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Hyg Environ Health 220: 329340.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Sigler R, Mahmoudi L, Graham JP, 2015. Analysis of behavioral change techniques in community-led total sanitation programs. Health Promot Int 30: 1628.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Zimba R et al., 2016. Chiengi district, Zambia open defecation free after 1 year of community-led total sanitation. Am J Trop Med Hyg 95: 925927.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Routray P, Schmidt WP, Boisson S, Clasen T, Jenkins MW, 2015. Socio-cultural and behavioural factors constraining latrine adoption in rural coastal Odisha: an exploratory qualitative study. BMC Pub Health 15: 880.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Merchant AT, Jones C, Kiure A, Kupka R, Fitzmaurice G, Herrera MG, Fawzi WW, 2003. Water and sanitation associated with improved child growth. Eur J Clin Nutr 57: 15621568.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mara D, Lane J, Scott B, Trouba D, 2010. Sanitation and health. PLoS Med 7: e1000363.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Freeman MC et al., 2014. Hygiene and health: systematic review of handwashing practices worldwide and update of health effects. Trop Med Int Health 19: 906916.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Seimetz E, Boyayo AM, Mosler HJ, 2016. The influence of contextual and psychosocial factors on handwashing. Am J Trop Med Hyg 94: 14071417.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Markle L, Maganani A, Katooka O, Tiwari A, Osbert N, Larsen DA, Winters B, 2017. A mobile platform enables unprecedented sanitation uptake in Zambia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 11: e0005131.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Crocker J, Saywell D, Bartram J, 2017. Sustainability of community-led total sanitation outcomes: evidence from Ethiopia and Ghana. Int J Hyg Environ Health 220: 551557.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.18-0632
Loading
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.18-0632
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplemental materials

  • Received : 01 Aug 2018
  • Accepted : 14 Jan 2019
  • Published online : 18 Feb 2019
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error