1921
Volume 100, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645

Abstract

Abstract.

The quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score has been proposed for risk stratification of emergency room patients with suspected infection. Its use of simple bedside observations makes qSOFA an attractive option for resource-limited regions. We prospectively assessed the predictive ability of qSOFA compared with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), universal vital assessment (UVA), and modified early warning score (MEWS) in a resource-limited setting in Lambaréné, Gabon. In addition, we evaluated different adaptations of qSOFA and UVA in this cohort and an external validation cohort from Malawi. We included 279 cases, including 183 with an ad hoc (suspected) infectious disease diagnosis. Overall mortality was 5%. In patients with an infection, oxygen saturation, mental status, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status, and all four risk stratification score results differed significantly between survivors and non-survivors. The UVA score performed best in predicting mortality in patients with suspected infection, with an area under the receiving operator curve (AUROC) of 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78–1.0, < 0.0001), outperforming qSOFA (AUROC 0.77; 95% CI: 0.63–0.91, = 0.0003), MEWS (AUROC 0.72; 95% CI: 0.58–0.87, = 0.01), and SIRS (AUROC 0.70; 95% CI: 0.52–0.88, = 0.03). An amalgamated qSOFA score applying the UVA thresholds for blood pressure and respiratory rate improved predictive ability in Gabon (AUROC 0.82; 95% CI: 0.68–0.96) but performed poorly in a different cohort from Malawi (AUROC 0.58; 95% CI: 0.51–0.64). In conclusion, UVA had the best predictive ability, but multicenter studies are needed to validate the qSOFA and UVA scores in various settings and assess their impact on patient outcome.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.18-0577
2018-11-26
2020-05-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/14761645/100/1/tpmd180577.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.18-0577&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Singer M et al., 2016. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA 315: 801810.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Seymour CW et al., 2016. Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis: for the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic Shock (sepsis-3). JAMA 315: 762774.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Song JU, Sin CK, Park HK, Shim SR, Lee J, 2018. Performance of the quick sequential (sepsis-related) organ failure assessment score as a prognostic tool in infected patients outside the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 22: 28.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fernando SM, Tran A, Taljaard M, Cheng W, Rochwerg B, Seely AJE, Perry JJ, 2018. Prognostic accuracy of the quick sequential organ failure assessment for mortality in patients with suspected infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 168: 266275.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Serafim R, Gomes JA, Salluh J, Povoa P, 2018. A comparison of the quick-SOFA and systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria for the diagnosis of sepsis and prediction of mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest 153: 646655.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Maitra S, Som A, Bhattacharjee S, 2018. Accuracy of quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria for predicting mortality in hospitalized patients with suspected infection: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Clin Microbiol Infect 24: 11231129.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Huson MA, Kalkman R, Grobusch MP, van der Poll T, 2017. Predictive value of the qSOFA score in patients with suspected infection in a resource limited setting in Gabon. Travel Med Infect Dis 15: 7677.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Huson MAM, Katete C, Chunda L, Ngoma J, Wallrauch C, Heller T, van der Poll T, Grobusch MP, 2017. Application of the qSOFA score to predict mortality in patients with suspected infection in a resource-limited setting in Malawi. Infection 45: 893896.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Aluisio AR, Garbern S, Wiskel T, Mutabazi ZA, Umuhire O, Ch’ng CC, Rudd KE, D'Arc Nyinawankusi J, Byiringiro JC, Levine AC, 2018. Mortality outcomes based on ED qSOFA score and HIV status in a developing low income country. Am J Emerg Med 36: 20102019.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Boillat-Blanco N, Mbarack Z, Samaka J, Mlaganile T, Mamin A, Genton B, Kaiser L, Calandra T, D’Acremont V, 2018. Prognostic value of quickSOFA as a predictor of 28-day mortality among febrile adult patients presenting to emergency departments in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. PLoS One 13: e0197982.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Rudd KE et al., 2018. Association of the quick sequential (sepsis-related) organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score with excess hospital mortality in adults with suspected infection in low- and middle-income countries. JAMA 319: 22022211.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bone RC, Sprung CL, Sibbald WJ, 1992. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure. Crit Care Med 20: 724726.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Subbe CP, Kruger M, Rutherford P, Gemmel L, 2001. Validation of a modified early warning score in medical admissions. QJM 94: 521526.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Moore CC et al., 2017. Derivation and validation of a universal vital assessment (UVA) score: a tool for predicting mortality in adult hospitalised patients in sub-Saharan Africa. BMJ Glob Health 2: e000344.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hajian-Tilaki K, 2014. Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics. J Biomed Inform 48: 193204.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.18-0577
Loading
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.18-0577
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplemental Tables

  • Received : 13 Jul 2018
  • Accepted : 10 Oct 2018
  • Published online : 26 Nov 2018
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error