Volume 100, Issue 1_Suppl
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645



Addressing ethical issues through mentorship is key to encouraging scientific integrity and increasing research capacity. Across the global health arena, mentorship requires helping mentees understand and negotiate the regulatory aspects of research—which can substantially differ even between countries with similar resources. Mentorship support spans across the research framework from obtaining ethical approval and ensuring scientific integrity, to determining authorship and disseminating study results—providing multiple opportunities to model ethical behavior for mentees. The power imbalances between the global north and south in accessing funding resources produce further challenges in setting the research agenda and for ensuring equity in the dissemination of research findings. Gender further complicates the aspiration for equity; the proportion of women in high administrative or research positions remains low. This study explores four specific mentoring case scenarios commonly encountered in the global health research field in low- and middle-income institutions.

[open-access] This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. NSB, 2016. Science and Engineering Indicators. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. [Google Scholar]
  2. Altman L, Broad W, , 2005. Global Trend: More Science, More Fraud. New York, NY: New York Times. [Google Scholar]
  3. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.17226/21896. [Google Scholar]
  4. IAC-IAP, 2012. Responsible Conduct in the Global Research Enterprise. Alkamaar, The Netherlands: InterAcademy Council. [Google Scholar]
  5. World Medical Association, 2013. WMA Declaration of Helsinki—Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Available at: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/. Accessed March 9, 2018.
  6. CIOMS International, 2002. Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Available at: https://cioms.ch/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/International_Ethical_Guidelines_for_Biomedical_Research_Involving_Human_Subjects.pdf. Accessed March 9, 2018.
  7. Steneck NH, , 1994. Research universities and scientific misconduct—history, policies, and the future. J Higher Educ 65: 310330. [Google Scholar]
  8. NIH, 1989. Requirement for Programs on the Responsible Conduct of Research in National Research Service Award Institutional Training Programs. Available at: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/historical/1989_12_22_vol_18_No_45.pdf. Accessed February 28, 2018.
  9. Plemmons DK, Kalichman MW, , 2018. Mentoring for responsible research: the creation of a curriculum for faculty to teach RCR in the research environment. Sci Eng Ethics 24: 207226. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rohwer A, Young T, Wager E, Garner P, , 2017. Authorship, plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/middle-income country health researchers. BMJ Open 7: e018467. [Google Scholar]
  11. Milford C, Wassenaar D, Slack C, , 2006. Resource and needs of research ethics committees in Africa: preparations for HIV vaccine trials. IRB 28: 19. [Google Scholar]
  12. Rugemalila JB, Kilama WL, , 2001. Proceedings of the seminar on health research ethics in Africa. Acta Tropica 78 (Suppl 1): S1S126. [Google Scholar]
  13. Heitman E, Olsen CH, Anestidou L, Bulger RE, , 2007. New graduate students’ baseline knowledge of the responsible conduct of research. Acad Med 82: 838845. [Google Scholar]
  14. Olesen AP, Amin L, Mahadi Z, , 2017. In their own words: research misconduct from the perspective of researchers in Malaysian universities. Sci Eng Ethics 2017 Dec 16 [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9997-9.
  15. Bouter LM, Tijdink J, Axelsen N, Martinson BC, Ter Riet G, , 2016. Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: results from a survey among participants of four World Conferences on Research Integrity. Res Integr Peer Rev 1: 17. [Google Scholar]
  16. Helgesson G, Eriksson S, , 2015. Plagiarism in research. Med Health Care Philos 18: 91101. [Google Scholar]
  17. Saldaña-Gastulo JJ, Quezada-Osoria CC, Peña-Oscuvilca A, Mayta-Tristán P, , 2010. Alta frecuencia de plagio en tesis de medicina de una universidad pública Peruana. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica 27: 6367. [Google Scholar]
  18. Misra DP, Ravindran V, Wakhlu A, Sharma A, Agarwal V, Negi VS, , 2017. Plagiarism: a viewpoint from India. J Korean Med Sci 32: 17341735. [Google Scholar]
  19. Li Y, , 2013. Text-based plagiarism in scientific publishing: issues, developments and education. Sci Eng Ethics 19: 12411254. [Google Scholar]
  20. Heitman E, Litewka S, , 2011. International perspectives on plagiarism and considerations for teaching international trainees. Urol Oncol 29: 104108. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang Y, , 2010. Chinese journal finds 31% of submissions plagiarized. Nature 467: 153. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lykkesfeldt J, , 2016. Strategies for using plagiarism software in the screening of incoming journal manuscripts: recommendations based on a recent literature survey. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 119: 161164. [Google Scholar]
  23. Marshall T, Taylor B, Hothersall E, Perez-Martin L, , 2011. Plagiarism: a case study of quality improvement in a taught postgraduate programme. Med Teach 33: e375e381. [Google Scholar]
  24. Marusic A, Wager E, Utrobicic A, Rothstein HR, Sambunjak D, , 2016. Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4: MR000038. [Google Scholar]
  25. Gasparyan AY, Nurmashev B, Seksenbayev B, Trukhachev VI, Kostyukova EI, Kitas GD, , 2017. Plagiarism in the context of education and evolving detection strategies. J Korean Med Sci 32: 12201227. [Google Scholar]
  26. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), 2018. Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. Available at: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html. Accessed March 5, 2018.
  27. OHRP, 2009. 45 CFR 46 Code of Federal Regulations. Available at: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/index.html.
  28. Parker M, Kingori P, , 2016. Good and bad research collaborations: researchers’ views on science and ethics in global health research. PLoS One 11: e0163579. [Google Scholar]
  29. Crump JA, Sugarman J, , 2008. Ethical considerations for short-term experiences by trainees in global health. JAMA 300: 14561458. [Google Scholar]
  30. DeCamp M, Lehmann LS, Jaeel P, Horwitch C, ACP Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee; , 2018. Ethical obligations regarding short-term global health clinical experiences: an American College of Physicians position paper. Ann Intern Med 168: 651657. [Google Scholar]
  31. Jagsi R, Griffith KA, Jones R, Perumalswami CR, Ubel P, Stewart A, , 2016. Sexual harassment and discrimination experiences of academic medical faculty. JAMA 315: 21202121. [Google Scholar]
  32. Clancy K, , 2018. Have the Sciences Had a #MeToo Moment? Not so Much. Washington, DC: National Geographic. [Google Scholar]
  33. Committee on the Impacts of Sexual Harassment in Academic Sciences E, and Medicine 2018. Sexual Harassment of Women: Climate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hamer DH, Rispel L, Nxumalo N, , 2019. Global health research mentoring competencies for individuals and institutions in low and middle-income countries. Am J Trop Med Hyg 100 (Suppl 1): 1519. [Google Scholar]
  • Received : 09 Jul 2018
  • Accepted : 01 Oct 2018
  • Published online : 14 Nov 2018

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error