Volume 100, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645



Nepal has completed the attack phase of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) elimination and now needs active case detection (ACD) and vector control methods that are suitable to the consolidation and maintenance phases. We evaluated different ACD approaches and vector control methods in Saptari district. We assessed 1) mobile teams deployed in villages with VL cases in 2015 to conduct combined camps for fever and skin lesions to detect VL/PKDL (post–kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis) and other infections; 2) an incentive approach by trained female community health volunteers (FCHVs) in villages with no VL cases in 2015. Both were followed by house-to-house visits. For vector control, four villages were randomly allocated to insecticide impregnation of bednets, insecticide wall painting, indoor residual spraying (IRS), and control. Sandfly density (by CDC light traps, The John W. Hock Company, USA) and mortality (World Health Organization cone bioassay) were assessed in randomly selected households. One VL, three tuberculosis, one leprosy, and one malaria cases were identified among 395 febrile cases attending the camps. Post-camp house-to-house screening involving 7,211 households identified 679 chronic fever and 461 skin lesion cases but no additional VL/PKDL. No VL/PKDL case was found by FCHVs. The point prevalence of chronic fever in camp and FCHV villages was 242 and 2 per 10,000 populations, respectively. Indoor residual spraying and bednet impregnation were effective for 1 month versus 12 months with insecticidal wall paint. Twelve-month sandfly mortality was 23%, 26%, and 80%, respectively, on IRS, bednet impregnation, and insecticide wall painting. In Nepal, fever camps and insecticidal wall paint prove to be alternative, sustainable strategies in the VL post-elimination program.

[open-access] This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. World Health Organization, 2010. Control of the leishmaniases. Report of a Meeting of the WHO Expert. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Technical Report Series, 949, 2226. [Google Scholar]
  2. World Health Organization-Regional Office for South-East Asia, 2015. Regional Strategic Framework for Elimination of Kala-azar from the South-East Asia. New Delhi, India: World Health Organization–Regional Office for South-East Asia. SEA-CD-239. [Google Scholar]
  3. World Health Organization–Regional Office for South-East Asia, 2006. Regional Strategic Framework for Elimination of Kala-azar from South-East Asia Region (2005–2015). New Delhi, India: World Health Organization–Regional Office for South-East Asia. [Google Scholar]
  4. World Health Organization, 2005. Regional technical advisory group on kala-azar elimination. Report of the First Meeting, Manesar, Haryana December 2004. New Delhi, India: Regional Office for South-East Asia, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  5. World Health Organization–Regional Office for South-East Asia, 2014. Health Ministers Committee for Eliminating Kala-azar. New Delhi, India: World Health Organization–Regional Office for South-East Asia. Available at: http://www.searo.who.int/mediacentre/releases/2014/pr1581/en/. Accessed July 27, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  6. World Health Organization, 2017. Community-Driven Programme is Key to Defeating Visceral Leishmaniasis in Bangladesh. Available at: http://www.who.int/leishmaniasis/news/Defeating_visceral_leishmaniasis_in_Bangladesh/en/. Accessed February 6, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hirve S, 2010. Effectiveness and feasibility of active and passive case detection in the visceral leishmaniasis elimination initiative in India, Bangladesh, and Nepal. Am J Trop Med Hyg 83: 507511. [Google Scholar]
  8. Huda MM, 2012. Active case detection in national visceral leishmaniasis elimination programs in Bangladesh, India, and Nepal: feasibility, performance and costs. BMC Public Health 12: 1001. [Google Scholar]
  9. Banjara MR, Kroeger A, Huda MM, Kumar V, Gurung CK, Das ML, Rijal S, Das P, Mondal D, , 2015. Feasibility of a combined camp approach for vector control together with active case detection of visceral leishmaniasis, post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis, tuberculosis, leprosy and malaria in Bangladesh, India and Nepal: an exploratory study. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 109: 408415. [Google Scholar]
  10. Le Rutte EA, 2017. Elimination of visceral leishmaniasis in the Indian subcontinent: a comparison of predictions from three transmission models. Epidemics 18: 6780. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chowdhury R, 2011. The Indian and Nepalese programmes of indoor residual spraying for the elimination of visceral leishmaniasis: performance and effectiveness. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 105: 3145. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mondal D, 2010. Insecticide-treated bed nets in rural Bangladesh: their potential role in the visceral leishmaniasis elimination programme. Trop Med Int Health 15: 13821389. [Google Scholar]
  13. Mondal D, Huda MM, Karmoker MK, Ghosh D, Matlashewski G, Nabi SG, Kroeger A, , 2013. Reducing visceral leishmaniasis by insecticide impregnation of bed-nets, Bangladesh. Emerg Infect Dis 19: 11311134. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mosqueira B, 2015. Pilot study on the combination of an organophosphate-based insecticide paint and pyrethroid-treated long lasting nets against pyrethroid resistant malaria vectors in Burkina Faso. Acta Trop 148: 162169. [Google Scholar]
  15. Amelotti I, Catalá SS, Gorla DE, , 2009. Experimental evaluation of insecticidal paints against Triatoma infestans (Hemiptera: Reduviidae), under natural climatic conditions. Parasit Vectors 2: 30. [Google Scholar]
  16. District Health Office, Saptari, 2015. District Health Profile, 2014/2015. Saptari: District Public Health Office.
  17. Lechner M, Greene WH, , 2010. The estimation of causal effects by difference-in-difference methods. , ed. Foundations and Trends in Econometrics, Vol. 4. Hanover, MA: now Publishers Inc., Hanover, 165224. [Google Scholar]
  18. WHO/TDR, 2010. Monitoring and Evaluation Toolkit for Indoor Residual Spraying. Available at: http://www.who.int/tdr/publications/documents/irs_toolkit.pdf?ua=1. Accessed February 6, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  19. Boettcher JP, Siwakoti Y, Milojkovic A, Siddiqui NA, Gurung CK, Rijal S, Das P, Kroeger A, Banjara MR, , 2015. Visceral leishmaniasis diagnosis and reporting delays as an obstacle to timely response actions in Nepal and India. BMC Infect Dis 15: 43. [Google Scholar]
  20. Raviglione M, Sulis G, , 2016. Tuberculosis 2015: burden, challenges and strategy for control and elimination. Infect Dis Rep 8: 6570. [Google Scholar]
  21. Das VNR, Pandey RN, Pandey K, Singh V, Kumar V, Matlashewski G, Das P, , 2014. Impact of ASHA training on active case detection of visceral leishmaniasis in Bihar, India. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8: e2774. [Google Scholar]
  22. Das VNR, Pandey RN, Kumar V, Pandey K, Siddiqui NA, Verma RB, Matlashewski G, Das P, , 2016. Repeated training of accredited social health activists (ASHAs) for improved detection of visceral leishmaniasis cases in Bihar, India. Pathog Glob Health 110: 3335. [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Received : 11 Apr 2018
  • Accepted : 14 Aug 2018
  • Published online : 12 Nov 2018

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error