1921
Volume 100, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645

Abstract

Abstract.

We compared the efficacy of three intervention packages for active case detection (ACD) of visceral leishmaniasis (VL)/post–kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) combined with sandfly control around an index case. The packages were 1) no kala-azar transmission activity involving indoor residual spraying (IRS) with deltamethrin, peri-domestic deployment of larvicide with temephos, and house-to-house search for cases; 2) fever camp (FC) plus durable wall lining (DWL) with deltamethrin; and 3) FC plus insecticide (deltamethrin) impregnated bed-nets (ITN) around an index case. Fever camp includes 1-day campaign at the village level to screen and diagnose VL, PKDL, leprosy, malaria, and tuberculosis among residents with chronic fever or skin disease. Efficacy was measured through yield of new cases, vector density reduction, and mortality at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months following intervention. Fever camp + DWL was the most efficacious intervention package with 0.5 case detected per intervention, 79% reduction in vector density (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.21, = 0.010), and 95.1% (95% confidence interval: 93.4%, 96.8%) sandfly mortality at 12 months. No kala-azar transmission activity was efficacious for vector control (74% vector reduction, IRR = 0.26, < 0.0001 at 9 months; and 84% sandfly mortality at 3 months), but not for case detection (0 case per intervention). Fever camp + ITN was efficacious in detection of VL/PKDL cases (0.43 case per intervention), but its efficacy for vector control was inconsistent. We recommend index case–based FC for ACD combined with DWL or IRS plus larvicide for sandfly control during the consolidation and maintenance phases of the VL elimination program of the Indian subcontinent.

[open-access] This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.18-0290
2018-11-19
2019-06-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/14761645/100/1/tpmd180290.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.18-0290&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alvar J, Velez ID, Bern C, Herrero M, Desjeux P, Cano J, Jannin J, den Boer M, WHO Leishmaniasis Control Team; , 2012. Leishmaniasis worldwide and global estimates of its incidence. PloS One 7: e35671. [Google Scholar]
  2. World Health Organization, 2005. Regional Technical Advisory Group on Kala-Azar Elimination. Report of the First Meeting, Manesar, Haaryana, 20–23 December 2004. New Delhi, India: Regional Office for South-East Asia. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahmed B-N, Nabi SG, Rahman M, Selim S, Bashar A, Rashid MM, Lira FY, Choudhury TA, Mondal D, , 2014. Kala-azar (visceral leishmaniasis) elimination in Bangladesh: successes and challenges. Curr Trop Med Rep 1: 163169. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bern C, Chowdhury R, , 2006. The epidemiology of visceral leishmaniasis in Bangladesh: prospects for improved control. Indian J Med Res 123: 275288. [Google Scholar]
  5. Rahman R, Bangali M, Kabir H, Naher F, Mahboob S, , 2008. Kala-azar Situation in Bangladesh, pp. 11–12. National guideline and training module for Kala-azar elimination in Bangladesh. Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
  6. Molina R, Ghosh D, Carrillo E, Monnerat S, Bern C, Mondal D, Alvar J, , 2017. Infectivity of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis patients to sand flies: revisiting a proof of concept in the context of the kala-azar elimination program in the Indian subcontinent. Clin Infect Dis 65: 150153. [Google Scholar]
  7. NKEP, CDC, 2016. National Guideline for Kala-azar Case Management in Bangladesh. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Directorate General of Health Services. [Google Scholar]
  8. Singh SP, 2011. Options for active case detection of visceral leishmaniasis in endemic districts of India, Nepal and Bangladesh, comparing yield, feasibility and costs. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5: e960. [Google Scholar]
  9. Banjara MR, Kroeger A, Huda MM, Kumar V, Gurung CK, Das ML, Rijal S, Das P, Mondal D, , 2015. Feasibility of a combined camp approach for vector control together with active case detection of visceral leishmaniasis, post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis, tuberculosis, leprosy and malaria in Bangladesh, India and Nepal: an exploratory study. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 109: 408415. [Google Scholar]
  10. Huda MM, 2012. Active case detection in national visceral leishmaniasis elimination programs in Bangladesh, India, and Nepal: feasibility, performance and costs. BMC Public Health 12: 1001. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mondal D, 2010. Insecticide-treated bed nets in rural Bangladesh: their potential role in the visceral leishmaniasis elimination programme. Trop Med Int Health 15: 13821389. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mondal D, Huda MM, Karmoker MK, Ghosh D, Matlashewski G, Nabi SG, Kroeger A, , 2013. Reducing visceral leishmaniasis by insecticide impregnation of bed-nets, Bangladesh. Emerg Infect Dis 19: 11311134. [Google Scholar]
  13. Messenger LA, 2012. Multicentre studies of insecticide-treated durable wall lining in Africa and South-East Asia: entomological efficacy and household acceptability during one year of field use. Malar J 11: 358. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mondal D, 2016. Efficacy, safety and cost of insecticide treated wall lining, insecticide treated bed nets and indoor wall wash with lime for visceral leishmaniasis vector control in the Indian sub-continent: a multi-country cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 10: e0004932. [Google Scholar]
  15. World Health Organization, UNICEF, 2010. Monitoring and evaluation tool kit for indoor residual spraying: Kala-azar elimination in Bangladesh, India and Nepal. Available at: http://www.who.int/tdr/publications/documents/irs_toolkit.pdf.
  16. Abbott WS, , 1987. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. 1925. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 3: 302303. [Google Scholar]
  17. World Health Organization Expert Committee, 1990. Control of the Leishmaniases. World Health Organ, Tech Rep Ser, 793.
  18. Najera JA, Zaim M, , 2001. Malaria Vector Control: Insecticides for Indoor Residual Spraying. World Health Organization document WHO/CDS/WHOPES/2001.3 Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
  19. Afrane YA, Mweresa NG, Wanjala CL, Gilbreath Iii TM, Zhou G, Lee MC, Githeko AK, Yan G, , 2016. Evaluation of long-lasting microbial larvicide for malaria vector control in Kenya. Malar J 15: 577. [Google Scholar]
  20. Fillinger U, Knols BG, Becker N, , 2003. Efficacy and efficiency of new Bacillus thuringiensis var israelensis and Bacillus sphaericus formulations against Afrotropical anophelines in Western Kenya. Trop Med Int Health 8: 3747. [Google Scholar]
  21. Chowdhury R, 2017. Control of Phlebotomus argentipes (Diptera: Psychodidae) sand fly in Bangladesh: a cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 11: e0005890. [Google Scholar]
  22. Huda MM, 2016. Entomological efficacy of durable wall lining with reduced wall surface coverage for strengthening visceral leishmaniasis vector control in Bangladesh, India and Nepal. BMC Infect Dis 16: 539. [Google Scholar]
  23. Das M, Banjara M, Chowdhury R, Kumar V, Rijal S, Joshi A, Akhter S, Das P, Kroeger A, , 2008. Visceral leishmaniasis on the Indian sub-continent: a multi-centre study of the costs of three interventions for the control of the sandfly vector, Phlebotomus argentipes. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 102: 729741. [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.18-0290
Loading
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.18-0290
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplemental Figure

  • Received : 05 Apr 2018
  • Accepted : 29 Aug 2018
  • Published online : 19 Nov 2018

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error