Volume 100, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645



There is increasing appreciation that latrine access does not imply use—many individuals who own latrines do not consistently use them. Little is known, however, about the determinants of latrine use, particularly among those with variable defecation behaviors. Using the integrated behavior model of water, sanitation, and hygiene framework, we sought to characterize determinants of latrine use in rural Ecuador. We interviewed 197 adults living in three communities with a survey consisting of 70 psychosocial defecation-related questions. Questions were excluded from analysis if responses lacked variability or at least 10% of respondents did not provide a definitive answer. All interviewed individuals had access to a privately owned or shared latrine. We then applied adaptive elastic nets (ENET) and supervised principal component analysis (SPCA) to a reduced dataset of 45 questions among 154 individuals with complete data to select determinants that predict self-reported latrine use. Latrine use was common, but not universal, in the sample (76%). The SPCA model identified six determinants and adaptive ENET selected five determinants. Three indicators were represented in both models—latrine users were more likely to report that their latrine is clean enough to use and also more likely to report daily latrine use; while those reporting that elderly men were not latrine users were less likely to use latrines themselves. Our findings suggest that social norms are important predictors of latrine use, whereas knowledge of the health benefits of sanitation may not be as important. These determinants are informative for promotion of latrine adoption.


Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Rizvi A, Gaff MF, Walker N, Horton S, Webb P, Lartey A, Black RE, , 2013. Maternal and child nutrition 2: evidence-based interventions for improvement of maternal and child nutrition : what can be done and at what cost ? Lancet 6736: 126. [Google Scholar]
  2. Del Carmen Casanovas M, Mangasaryan N, Mwadime R, Hajeebhoy N, Aguilar AM, Kopp C, Rico L, Ibiett G, Andia D, Onyango AW, , 2013. Multi-sectoral interventions for healthy growth. Matern Child Nutr 9: 4657. [Google Scholar]
  3. Humphrey JH, , 2009. Child undernutrition, tropical enteropathy, toilets, and handwashing. Lancet 374: 10321035. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wolf J, 2014. Systematic review: assessing the impact of drinking water and sanitation on diarrhoeal disease in low- and middle-income settings: systematic review and meta-regression. Trop Med Int Heal 19: 928942. [Google Scholar]
  5. Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), 2016. Environmental Gradients and Health Inequalities in the Americas Sustainable Development and Health Equity. Available at: http://iris.paho.org/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/31404/9789275119136-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed November 14, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  6. WHO/UNICEF, Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation (JMP). Available at: https://washdata.org/. Accessed November 14, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fuller JA, Villamor E, Cevallos W, Trostle J, Eisenberg JN, , 2016. I get height with a little help from my friends: herd protection from sanitation on child growth in rural Ecuador. Int J Epidemiol 45: 460469. [Google Scholar]
  8. Clasen T, 2014. Effectiveness of a rural sanitation programme on diarrhoea, soil-transmitted helminth infection, and child malnutrition in Odisha, India: a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet Glob Heal 2: e645e653. [Google Scholar]
  9. Patil SR, Arnold BF, Salvatore AL, Briceno B, Ganguly S, Colford JM, Gertler PJ, , 2015. The effect of India’s total sanitation campaign on defecation behaviors and child health in rural Madhya Pradesh: a cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med 11: e1001709. [Google Scholar]
  10. Barnard S, Routray P, Majorin F, Peletz R, Boisson S, Sinha A, Clasen T, , 2013. Impact of Indian total sanitation campaign on latrine coverage and use: a cross-sectional study in Orissa three years following programme implementation. PLoS One 8: e71438. [Google Scholar]
  11. Rotondo LA, Ngondi J, Rodgers AF, King JD, Kamissoko Y, Amadou A, Jip N, Cromwell EA, Emerson PM, , 2009. Evaluation of community intervention with pit latrines for trachoma control in Ghana, Mali, Niger and Nigeria. Int Health 1: 154162. [Google Scholar]
  12. Burke NJ, Joseph G, Pasick RJ, Barker JC, , 2009. Theorizing social context: rethinking behavioral theory. Health Educ Behav 36 (Suppl 5): 55S70S. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hulland K, Martin N, Dreibelbis R, DeBruicker Valliant J, Winch P, , 2015. What Factors Affect Sustained Adoption of Safe Water, Hygiene and Sanitation Technologies? A Systematic Review of Literature. London, United Kingdom: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, UCL Institute of Education, University College London. [Google Scholar]
  14. Routray P, Schmidt W-P, Boisson S, Clasen T, Jenkins MW, , 2015. Socio-cultural and behavioural factors constraining latrine adoption in rural coastal Odisha: an exploratory qualitative study. BMC Public Health 15: 880. [Google Scholar]
  15. Coffey D, Gupta A, Hathi P, Khurana N, Spears D, Srivastav N, Vyas S, , 2014. Revealed preference for open defecation. Econ Political Wkly 49: 4355. [Google Scholar]
  16. Dreibelbis R, Jenkins M, Chase RP, Torondel B, Routray P, Boisson S, Clasen T, Freeman MC, , 2015. Development of a multidimensional scale to assess attitudinal determinants of sanitation uptake and use. Environ Sci Technol 49: 1361313621. [Google Scholar]
  17. United Nations Secretary-General, 2017. Progress Towards the Sustainable Development Goals: Rport E/2017/66. Geneva Switzerland: UN Secretary General. [Google Scholar]
  18. Eisenberg JNS, 2006. Environmental change and infectious disease: how new roads affect the transmission of diarrheal pathogens in rural Ecuador. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 1946019465. [Google Scholar]
  19. Dreibelbis R, Winch PJ, Leontsini E, Hulland KR, Ram PK, Unicomb L, Luby SP, , 2013. The integrated behavioural model for water, sanitation, and hygiene: a systematic review of behavioural models and a framework for designing and evaluating behaviour change interventions in infrastructure-restricted settings. BMC Public Health 13: 1015. [Google Scholar]
  20. Cialdini RB, Reno RR, Kallgren CA, , 1990. A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. J Pers Soc Psychol 58: 10151026. [Google Scholar]
  21. Tibshirani R, , 1996. Regression selection and shrinkage via the Lasso. J R Stat Soc B 58: 267288. [Google Scholar]
  22. Bair E, Hastie T, Paul D, Tibshirani R, , 2006. Prediction by supervised principal components. J Am Stat Assoc 101: 119137. [Google Scholar]
  23. Zou H, Zhang HH, , 2009. On the adaptive elastic-net with a diverging number of parameters. Ann Stat 37: 17331751. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lockhart R, Taylor J, Tibshirani RJ, Tibshirani R, , 2014. A significance test for the lasso. Ann Stat 42: 413468. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wallach D, Goffinet B, , 1989. Mean squared error of prediction as a criterion for evaluating and comparing system models. Ecol Modell 44: 299306. [Google Scholar]
  26. Jenkins MW, Freeman MC, Routray P, , 2014. Measuring the safety of excreta disposal behavior in India with the new safe san index: reliability, validity and utility. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11: 83198346. [Google Scholar]
  27. Aarts H, Verplanken B, Knippenberg A, , 1998. Predicting behavior from actions in the past: repeated decision making or a matter of habit? J Appl Soc Psychol 28: 13551374. [Google Scholar]
  28. DiMaggio P, , 1997. Culture and cognition. Annu Rev Sociol 23: 263287. [Google Scholar]
  29. Bayer JB, Campbell SW, Ling R, , 2016. Connection cues: activating the norms and habits of social connectedness. Commun Theory 26: 128149. [Google Scholar]
  30. Tumwebaze IK, Orach CG, Niwagaba C, Luthi C, Mosler H-J, , 2013. Sanitation facilities in Kampala slums, Uganda: users’ satisfaction and determinant factors. Int J Environ Health Res 23: 191204. [Google Scholar]
  31. Nelson KB, Karver J, Kullman C, Graham JP, , 2014. User perceptions of shared sanitation among rural households in Indonesia and Bangladesh. PLoS One 9: 113. [Google Scholar]
  32. Garn JV, Sclar GD, Freeman MC, Penakalapati G, Alexander KT, Brooks P, Rehfuess EA, Boisson S, Medlicott KO, Clasen TF, , 2016. The impact of sanitation interventions on latrine coverage and latrine use: systematic review and meta analysis. Int J Hyg Environ Health 220: 329340. [Google Scholar]
  33. Biran A, Jenkins MW, Dabrase P, Bhagwat I, , 2011. Patterns and determinants of communal latrine usage in urban poverty pockets in Bhopal, India. Trop Med Int Heal 16: 854862. [Google Scholar]
  34. Jenkins MW, Curtis V, , 2005. Achieving the ‘good life’: why some people want latrines in rural Benin. Soc Sci Med 61: 24462459. [Google Scholar]
  35. Roma E, Buckley C, Jefferson B, Jeffrey P, , 2010. Assessing users’ experience of shared sanitation facilities: a case study of community ablution blocks in Durban, South Africa. Water SA 36: 589594. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kwiringira J, Atekyereza P, Niwagaba C, Günther I, , 2014. Descending the sanitation ladder in urban Uganda: evidence from Kampala slums. BMC Public Health 14: 624. [Google Scholar]
  37. Aiemjoy K, 2017. Is using a latrine “a strange thing to do”? A mixed-methods study of sanitation preference and behaviors in rural Ethiopia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 96: 6573. [Google Scholar]
  38. O’Reilly K, Louiss’ E, , 2014. The toilet tripod: understanding successful sanitation in rural India. Heal Place 29: 4351. [Google Scholar]
  39. Shakya HB, Christakis NA, Fowler JH, , 2015. Social network predictors of latrine ownership. Soc Sci Med 125: 129138. [Google Scholar]
  40. Bandura A, , 1989. Human agency in social cognitive theory. Am Psychol 44: 11751184. [Google Scholar]
  41. Simms VM, Makalo P, Bailey RL, Emerson PM, , 2005. Sustainability and acceptability of latrine provision in the Gambia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 99: 631637. [Google Scholar]
  42. Whaley L, Webster J, , 2011. The effectiveness and sustainability of two demand-driven sanitation and hygiene approaches in Zimbabwe. J Water Sanit Hyg Dev 1: 2036. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ajzen I, , 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50: 179211. [Google Scholar]
  44. Becker MH, Maiman LA, Kirscht JP, Haefner DP, Drachman RH, , 1977. The health belief model and prediction of dietary compliance: a field experiment. J Health Soc Behav 18: 348366. [Google Scholar]
  45. Fishbein M, Ajzen I, , 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 118. [Google Scholar]
  46. Janz NK, Becker MH, , 1984. The health belief model: a decade later. Health Educ Q 11: 147. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kar K, Chambers R, , 2008. Handbook on Community-Led Total Sanitation, Vol. 44. London, UK: vis Plan, UK. Available at: http://www.communityledtotalsanitation.org/sites/communityledtotalsanitation.org/files/cltshandbook.pdf. Accessed November 14, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  48. Aunger R, Curtis V, , 2016. Behaviour centred design: towards an applied science of behaviour change. Health Psychol Rev 10: 425446. [Google Scholar]
  49. Schwarz N, , 2001. Asking questions about behavior: cognition, communication, and questionnaire construction. Am J Eval 22: 127160. [Google Scholar]
  50. Tourangeau R, Yan T, , 2007. Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychol Bull 133: 859883. [Google Scholar]
  51. Hulland KRS, Chase RP, Caruso BA, Swain R, Biswal B, Sahoo KC, Panigrahi P, Dreibelbis R, , 2015. Sanitation, stress, and life stage: a systematic data collection study among women in Odisha, India. PLoS One 10: e0141883. [Google Scholar]
  52. Sahoo KC, Hulland KRS, Caruso BA, Swain R, Freeman MC, Panigrahi P, Dreibelbis R, , 2015. Sanitation-related psychosocial stress: a grounded theory study of women across the life-course in Odisha, India. Soc Sci Med 139: 8089. [Google Scholar]
  53. Arnold BF, Khush RS, Ramaswamy P, London AG, Rajkumar P, Ramaprabha P, Durairaj N, Hubbard AE, Balakrishnan K, Colford JM, , 2010. Causal inference methods to study nonrandomized, preexisting development interventions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 2260522610. [Google Scholar]
  54. Banda K, 2007. Water handling, sanitation and defecation practices in rural southern India: a knowledge, attitudes and practices study. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 101: 11241130. [Google Scholar]
  55. Caruso BA, Freeman MC, Garn JV, Dreibelbis R, Saboori S, Muga R, Rheingans R, , 2014. Assessing the impact of a school-based latrine cleaning and handwashing program on pupil absence in Nyanza Province, Kenya: a cluster-randomized trial. Trop Med Int Heal 19: 11851197. [Google Scholar]
  56. Sonego IL, Mosler H-J, , 2014. Why are some latrines cleaner than others? Determining the factors of habitual cleaning behaviour and latrine cleanliness in rural Burundi. J Water Sanit Hyg Dev 4: 257267. [Google Scholar]
  57. Tumwebaze IK, Mosler H-J, , 2015. Effectiveness of group discussions and commitment in improving cleaning behaviour of shared sanitation users in Kampala, Uganda slums. Soc Sci Med 147: 7279. [Google Scholar]
  58. Kwiringira J, Atekyereza P, Niwagaba C, Günther I, , 2014. Gender variations in access, choice to use and cleaning of shared latrines; experiences from Kampala slums, Uganda. BMC Public Health 14: 1180. [Google Scholar]
  59. Kwiringira J, Atekyereza P, Niwagaba C, Kabumbuli R, Rwabukwali C, Kulabako R, Günther I, , 2016. Seasonal variations and shared latrine cleaning practices in the slums of Kampala city, Uganda. BMC Public Health 16: 361. [Google Scholar]
  60. Mosler H, Sonego IL, , 2017. Improved latrine cleanliness through behaviour change and changes in quality of latrine construction: a longitudinal intervention study in rural Burundi. Int J Environ Health Res 27: 355367. [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

Supplemental materials

  • Received : 16 Feb 2018
  • Accepted : 08 Dec 2018
  • Published online : 21 Jan 2019

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error