Volume 99, Issue 6
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645



Tuberculosis (TB) prevalence among incarcerated populations is as much as 1,000 times higher than in the general population. This study evaluates whether correctional facilities serve as a reservoir through which TB is transmitted to surrounding communities. Tuberculosis test data were extracted from the South African National Health Laboratory Service database for patients tested for TB between 2005 and 2011. We conducted graphical analysis to assess the relationship of TB rates between incarcerated and non-incarcerated populations over time. We performed generalized linear modeling with a log link function to assess TB risk in communities surrounding correctional facilities, net of confounders. We assessed linkages between incarcerated and non-incarcerated populations over time using Granger causality analysis. Tuberculosis prevalence among incarcerated populations was four times higher than in the general population. Tuberculosis incidence rates in incarcerated and non-incarcerated populations followed similar trends over time. The presence of a correctional facility in a municipality was associated with 34.9% more detected TB cases (confidence interval: 11.6–63.2; < 0.01), controlling for potential confounders. Detected TB in incarcerated populations did not have predictive power in explaining detected TB rates in the non-incarcerated population after controlling for serial correlation in the time series data. Despite high TB prevalence, trends in correctional facilities do not appear to be driving temporal trends in the general population. However, correctional facilities still act as a TB reservoir that raises the overall TB risk in the vicinity. Intensified TB control policies for correctional facilities, formerly incarcerated individuals, and surrounding communities will reduce TB prevalence overall.


Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Walmsley R, 2016. World Prison Population List, 11th edition. London, United Kingdom: International Centre for Prison Studies.
  2. Rubenstein LS, Amon JJ, McLemore M, Eba P, Dolan K, Lines R, Beyrer C, 2016. HIV, prisoners, and human rights. Lancet 388: 12021214.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Biadglegne F, Rodloff AC, Sack U, 2015. Reviews of the prevalence and drug resistance of tuberculosis in prisons: a hidden epidemic. Epidemiol Infect 143: 887900.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Stop TB Partnership, 2016. Key Populations Brief: Prisoners. Available at: http://www.stoptb.org/assets/documents/resources/publications/acsm/KP_Prisoners_Spreads.pdf. Accessed May 20, 2018.
  5. Stop TB Partnership, 2015. Global Plan to End TB: The Paradigm Shift 2016–2020. Available at: http://www.stoptb.org/assets/documents/global/plan/GlobalPlanToEndTB_TheParadigmShift_2016-2020_StopTBPartnership.pdf. Accessed May 20, 2018.
  6. Stott KE, de Oliviera T, Lessells RJ, 2013. Combined antiretroviral and anti-tuberculosis drug resistance following incarceration. South Afr J HIV Med 14: 135137.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. O’Grady J, Mwaba P, Bates M, Kapata N, Zumla A, 2011. Tuberculosis in prisons in sub-Saharan Africa—a potential time bomb. S Afr Med J 101: 107108.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Sacchi FP, Praca RM, Tatara MB, Simonsen V, Ferrazoli L, Croda MG, Suffys PN, Ko AI, Andrews JR, Croda J, 2015. Prisons as reservoir for community transmission of tuberculosis, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis 21: 452455.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Barniol J, Niemann S, Louis VR, Brodhun B, Dreweck C, Richter E, Becher H, Haas W, Junghanss T, 2009. Transmission dynamics of pulmonary tuberculosis between autochthonous and immigrant sub-populations. BMC Infect Dis 9: 197.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Haas WH, Engelmann G, Amthor B, Shyamba S, Mugala F, Felten M, Rabbow M, Leichsenring M, Oosthuizen OJ, Bremer HJ, 1999. Transmission dynamics of tuberculosis in a high-incidence country: prospective analysis by PCR DNA fingerprinting. J Clin Microbiol 37: 39753979.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Viana M, Mancy R, Biek R, Cleaveland S, Cross PC, Lloyd-Smith JO, Haydon DT, 2014. Assembling evidence for identifying reservoirs of infection. Trends Ecol Evol 29: 270279.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. WHO, 2016. Global Tuberculosis Report 2016. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/250441/1/9789241565394-eng.pdf?ua=1. Accessed May 20, 2018.
  13. Mukinda FK, Mahomed H, 2014. A systematic review of the epidemiology of and programmatic response to tuberculosis in inmates and the correctional services in South Africa. Evidence to Inform South African Tuberculosis Policies (EVISTAT) Project. Tygerberg, South Africa: Stellenbosch University.
  14. Reid SE et al., 2012. Tuberculosis and HIV control in sub-Saharan African prisons: “thinking outside the prison cell.” J Infect Dis 205 (Suppl 2): S265S273.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. World Prison Brief data, Institute for Criminal Policy Research, Birbeck, University of London, 2017. Available at: http://www.prisonstudies.org/country/south-africa. Accessed May 20, 2018. Accessed October 11, 2018.
  16. Johnstone-Robertson S, Lawn SD, Welte A, Bekker L, Wood R, 2011. Tuberculosis in a South African prison—a transmission modeling analysis. South Afr Med J 101: 806813.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Telisinghe L, Fielding KL, Malden JL, Hanifa Y, Churchyard GJ, Grant AD, Charalambous S, 2014. High tuberculosis prevalence in a South African prison: the need for routine tuberculosis screening. PLoS One 9: e87262.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Deb P, Norton EC, Manning WG, 2017. Health Econometrics Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
  19. Statistics South Africa, 2012. Census 2011 Metadata. Pretoria, South Africa: Statistics South Africa.
  20. Massyn N, 2013. District Health Barometer 2011/12. Durban, South Africa: Health Systems Trust.
  21. Statistics South Africa, 2012. South African Statistics, 2011. Pretoria, South Africa: Statistics South Africa.
  22. Lopez L, Weber S, 2017. Testing for Granger Causality in Panel Data. IRENE Institute of Economic Research Working Paper: 17-03. Neuchatel, Switzerland: University of Neuchatel.

Data & Media loading...

Supplemental Table

  • Received : 17 Aug 2017
  • Accepted : 22 Jul 2018
  • Published online : 01 Oct 2018
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error